Alex Kozinski admonished for raunchy Internet files

Did Judge Alex Kozinski, Chief Of the Ninth Circuit, Break The Rule of Law For Power?

Again?

YOU BETCHA!!

Judge Kozinski presents a distorted view of what this case is all about. It requires a response that can be part of the public record. Otherwise his response to the call would remain hidden from public view.

Like the fact that he lied about his webpage porno server he ran out of his official "OFFICE" computer.

Under the "Rule," all three panel judges must vote, on the record" to deny an appeal:

EXAMPLE:

"[t]he panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Tashima and Timlin recommend denial. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f)."

" The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed."
OPINION''

EXAMPLE 2:

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
"Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3."

OPINION''

Never one to follow the rules in the appeal of killercop, Lord Kozinski rules by fiat! Click on the box below and notice the document doesn't follow the law.

A.K.A. No votes but one!

It should look like this one. Notice all the voting going on in it? This one too! Notice all the voting going on in it, too?

None in mine.

Judge Alex Kozinski, to cover up for his buddy, judge A. Howard Matz, seen here; who was busy covering his own butt, and his good friend Debra's butt, decided to vote, by himself, in secret. He and his buddy Matz do things in secret. Here is one for him.

I know all three like secret hearings, too. Even though the law forbids it.

So his buddy Alex "silently dust binned" another inconvenient opinion, and paid "lip service" to the Constitution and the Supreme Court case law and all the "substantial" illegal sentences being handed down by his good buddy, Hizzzzzzonor Lord Tyrant Matz.

How ya like those apples, Johnny?

Alex Kozinski like to play dummy, too! Or so it seems...and that's the end of it! Wrong! "Who knows where they are routed????" The freaking F.B.I. does. That's who. Oh, that's right, they are playing dumb too!

And they found nothing to prove a single fact that Killercop "did it."

Which Killercop denied since the arrest.

And so Kozinski hand picks Sung, the False CON-fessor. And that's a fact!

They all knew they had no proof, or jurisdiction under any law, and that was the breaking point in the law, but the power was irresistible to the perverts. And that was their breaking point, to ignore the facts and the law. And that's the end of it.

Kozinski's good buddy, Federal Judge A. Howard Matz, above, of the lower realm, likes to play computer dummy, too! Here is another good example.

His favorite game he is really good at playing is called hide the experts.

But he "excels" at the game of hide the certificate required by the law.

But even that pales in comparison to his skills at the missing Doctor game and the "special" game he almost perfected which he calls, "I Can Have 'Secret Hearings' In America, Just 'Cause I Say So."

And because his good buddy Alex Kozinski would cover up for him. Why? Koz-isayso! And that's the end of it.

The Case Of "It Appears We Never Met..." A.K.A A SIDEBAR OF XX AND XXX Files.

Wizard Of Koz admits violating Separation of Powers Act, conspiring with attorney Sung Park, on the record, to "use the Killercop case to 'make law.'" To become the "law of the land."

So that seemed the end of it...

But first they had to label "it" an instrument of commerce.

Then they could have the Power To Shut The Internet Down!

HOW TO SCREW U, OUT OF A CAUSE, TO MAKE A CASE. JUST 'CAUSEISAYSO!!

"Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give the appearance of solidity to pure wind." ~George Orwell

Supreme Court Of U.S. criticizes the District Court for its attempt to change the rules “at the eleventh hour” to treat “this high-profile trial” differently contrary to federal statutes and policy.

Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order allowing for real-time broadcasting to five federal courthouses, but did not address broadcasting the trial online due to technical difficulties encountered by the District Court staff.  In a per curiam decision, the Supreme Court held that the revision of the local district rule did not follow procedures designated by federal law

A FINDING OF FACT:

Judge Kozinski's website was specifically intended for the sharing of pornographic material through his "office" computer.

"People send me stuff like this all the time," Kozinski said.

He also used a his "office" computer to publish the files and he knew to specifically "exclude" the other jurist's that shared the site out of his server, for over two years, with a simple robot text file.

He admits using the computer to research a legal split in the Ninth he opposed from his server in the article he wrote called Don't Split the Ninth Circuit. The files Kozinski was using are found here.

He denied knowing the "stuff" directory on his site was "public" then claimed "someone else did it."

But we've found a another piece of evidence. In June 2004, Alex Kozinski sent a public letter in HTML language, humorously nominating himself as part of a "Judicial Hottie contest"

Courthouse Forum: The Hot. Alex Kozinski

This letter contains links, and one sentence is:

" I bungee jump."

In there, "bungee jump" is linked to: http://alex.kozinski.com/stuff/jump.avi

Again, that's the key directory.

This shows that Judge Kozinski knew the general public could retrieve specific material from that directory, and in at least that case he invited the public to do so.

Alex Kozinski was also hand-picked to decide case 04-50189, U.S. v Sutcliffe, a watershed, "sea change" case in the law of Internet jurisdiction, affecting millions of Americans lives and freedoms. How ironic Kozinski's decision in that case now could land him in prison (MP3) under his own "circumstantial inference rejection."

During oral arguments in case 04-50189, where jurisdiction had yet to be ruled on, Judge Alex, Stephen S. Trott, and the ringer they brought in from out of state to "visit," who by the way knew nada about computer MAC address, FTP or IP address, Monroe G. McKay; to induce a little, good ol' days "nostalgia about telephones," just to help them conjure up and invoke jurisdiction to obtain the power to "shut down" the Internet. Which conveniently ignores law which requires specific intent and proof the accused transmitted, i.e., "loaded/posted" the offending speech being called illegal. McKay and company prefers to use "circumstantial" evidence as a standard to convict Citizens. Listen here.

But there was a lot of ignoring of the law in this case.

They drool at such power. They know how to weld the tool to suppress speech. That's why this judge now claims he accidentally loaded the images.

 

 

HIS PERSONAL... OR OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT OFFICE COMPUTER?

 

 

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2011. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and babies!

But always remember, children, evil only triumphs when good men or women do nothing. And police are here to be your friend. Or so the story goes.

THE END.

The Judgment: Un X-Treme Advocacy Contest Winner for 2011!!

 

HE CAN'T DENY THE REVENGE THING??? SOUNDS BIASED TO ME. I THOUGHT YOUR BUDDY, JUDGE MATZ, SAID ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE!!

 

OFF WITH HIS HEAD!!

 

MAYBE HE WOULD NEVER CONFESS...BUT ONE OF YOU WILL!! AND THAT'S A FACT! OR SOMEONE IS GOING TO DIE IN 2011.

 

DOJ: Department of Jihad?

 

A.K.A. A WAR ON WIKI?

 

HERE'S A THOUGHT FOR YOU, ALEX.

 

YOU MIGHT BELIEVE YOURSELF TO BE ABOVE THE LAW, A GOD IF YOU WILL, BUT NO MATTER WHAT YOUR PUPPET SAYS, FALSELY TO YOUR HAND PICKED COURT, I ALWAYS DID, AND STILL DO, DENY ANY REVENGE THING!!" I NEVER "PUT" IT ON-LINE. CAN YOU SAY THE SAME? ABOUT THE REVENGE THING?

 

OR CAN [T]HE[Y]?

 

I SEE YOUR NEW CLERK IS A RACIST LIKE THESE PEOPLE, AND IT LOOKS LIKE SHE IS NOW ABOUT TO LEARN ABOUT "THE REVENGE THING," TOO! YOU SHOULD HIRE CHUCK, HE IS GREAT AT COVERING UP HATE CRIMES, TOO!!

A TEST

As discussed below, our newly stated “abuse of discretion” test (.pdf) requires us first to consider whether the district court identified the correct legal standard for decision of the issue before it.

 

Second, the test then requires us to determine whether the district court’s findings of fact, and its application of those findings of fact to the correct legal standard, were illogical, implausible, or without support in inferences that may be drawn from facts in the record.

 

"In a free market economy, the ability to give and receive information about commercial matters may be as important, sometimes more important, than expression of a political, artistic, or religious nature." ~Alex Kozinski

 

SAY WHAT?

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will "not" pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

 

"Besides, we would have to lock them all up and there would be just one left in the courthouses across America." And that's the end of it.

SAY WHAT?

"The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed — where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once." ~Alex Kozinski

Alex Kozinski a.k.a. Another Computer "Expert."

In the sound byte on this page he wax's on about how, "If [killercop] was gonna testify..."

This clearly shows Alex never read the trial files, otherwise he would have known Killercop never did testify.

Especially after Alex's good buddy, in the lower Central District Federal Court, Judge A. Howard Matz, denied Killercop Due Process (.pdf) and Assistance of Counsel, inter alia. Not to mention the willful and vindictive illegal sentence. Did I forget to mention this illegal act, too? And he forces counsel on people too!

Alex Kozinski (above), with his arm around his good buddy, A. Howard Matz, is a "conservative" appointee of former president Ronald Reagan, who is chief of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, transmitted in interstate commerce, photos of naked women standing on all fours and painted to look like cows, as well as videos of half-naked men with sexually aroused farm animals. And that's the end of it.

A step-by-step pictorial depicted a woman shaving her pubic hair and other images showed masturbation and what one news paper called "contortionist sex."

The images were posted to a sub domain of the judge's web site that could only be accessed by directly typing in the correct URL. The domain, however, was not password-protected. In addition to the pornographic images, the sub domain contained legal writings, music files and the judge's personal photos.

The judge told the Times that he accidentally loaded the images to his server and would not have intentionally posted them.

Judge Kozinski claims defense that "others might have loaded the porn images."

We find that funny since his court jester Sung Park claimed in the criminal appeal of killercop.com the exact same theory, but was denied by the Wizard Of Koz.

Can't he use now Kozinski's defense, that, "I had no idea, but that sounds right, because I sure don't remember putting some of that stuff there?"

Alex Kozinski claims ignorance of the crime, while his good buddy, A. Howard Matz, claims ignorance of the law. Opps, that was supposed to be a secret!! (.pdf) Seriously, a secret, or two!

Kozinski said he thought some of the photos were "funny" but acknowledged that the photo of the women painted as cows was "degrading" and "gross." He said, however, that he didn't think the images were obscene.

Another site reported that there was a folder "which included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal.

Some of the material was inappropriate, he conceded, although he defended other sexually explicit content as 'funny.'

What “Stuff” was on Judge Kozinski’s Personal Website?

Did you stumble across any of the judge's perverted and "obscene" pornographic pictures and movies, before he realized he was caught? Ever trade with him?

Since when is cavorting with farm animals part of everyday life?

"The sexually explicit material on the site was extensive, including images of masturbation, public sex and contortionist sex. There was a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, and a folder that contained a series of photos of women's crotches in snug-fitting clothing or underwear."

THE BOTTOM LINE:

We at killercop.com mooooooove that Kozinski be remooooooved from the bench and indicted forthwith for his double standards under the law. That's just this lone cowboy's perspective.

At least until you change the very words of the law. Like yer buddy Matz did. Substantially!

15 of the 16 cases?

Oh My Gawd!

And that's the end of i.T.

Or So It Seems.

25 Rules Of The Game For Catching Wild Pigs.

Your presence on Earth is no longer necessary.

• "My web page is in my office at home not here." ~Alex Kozinski, 04-50189, U.S. v Sutcliffe

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!

COWARDS!

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum