Alex Kozinski admonished for raunchy Internet files

Judge Alex Kozinski, to cover up for his buddy, judge A. Howard Matz, seen here; who was busy covering his own butt, and his good friend Debra's butt, decided to vote, by himself, in secret.

Matz and Debra like secret hearings, too. Even though the law forbids it.

A.K.A.: Alex "silently dust binned" another inconvenient opinion, and paid "lip service" to the Constitution and the Supreme Court case law.

How ya like those apples, Johnny?

Alex Kozinski like to play dummy, too! Or so it seems...and that's the end of it! Wrong! "Who knows where they are routed?" The freaking F.B.I. does. That's who. Oh, that's right, they are playing dumb too!

And they found nothing to prove a single fact that Killercop "did it." Which Killercop denied since the arrest. And so they find Sung, the False CON-fessor. And that's a fact!

They all knew they had no proof, or jurisdiction under any law, and that was the breaking point in the law, but the power was irresistible to the perverts. And that was their breaking point, to ignore the facts and the law. And that's the end of it.

Kozinski's good buddy, Federal Judge A. Howard Matz, of the lower realm, likes to play computer dummy, too! His favorite game he is really good at playing is called hide the experts. But he "excels" at the game of hide the certificate required by the law. But even that pales in comparison to his skills at the missing Doctor game and the "special" game he almost perfected which he calls, "I Can Have 'Secret Hearings' In America, Just 'Cause I Say So."

And because his good buddy Alex Kozinski would cover up for him. Why? Koz-isayso! And that's the end of it.

The Case Of "It Appears We Never Met..." A.K.A A SIDEBAR OF XX AND XXX Files.

Wizard Of Koz admits violating Separation of Powers Act, conspiring with attorney Sung Park, on the record, to "use the Killercop case to 'make law.'" To become the "law of the land."

So that seemed the end of it...

But first thay had to label "it" an instrument of commerce.

Then they could have the Power To Shut The Internet Down!

HOW TO SCREW U, OUT OF A CAUSE, TO MAKE A CASE.

Supreme Court Of U.S. criticizes the District Court for its attempt to change the rules “at the eleventh hour” to treat “this high-profile trial” differently contrary to federal statutes and policy.

Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued an order allowing for real-time broadcasting to five federal courthouses, but did not address broadcasting the trial online due to technical difficulties encountered by the District Court staff.  In a per curiam decision, the Supreme Court held that the revision of the local district rule did not follow procedures designated by federal law

Did Judge Alex Kozinski Break The Law? Again?

The "Rule"says that "all three panel judges must vote, on the record" to deny an appeal:

EXAMPLE:

"[t]he panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judge Berzon has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Tashima and Timlin recommend denial. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the petition for rehearing en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f)."

" The petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed."
OPINION''

EXAMPLE 2:

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
"Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3."

OPINION''

Not one to follow the rules in the appeal of killercop, Lord Kozinski rules by fiat! Click on the box below and notice the document doesn't follow the law.

No vote.

It should look like this one. Notice all the voting going on in it? This one too!

None in mine.

A FINDING OF FACT:

 

Judge's website was specifically intended for the sharing of pornographic material

"People send me stuff like this all the time," Kozinski said.

He also used a his "office" computer to publish the files and he knew to specifically "exclude" the other jurist's that shared the site out of his server, for over two years, with a simple robot text file.

He admits using the computer to research a legal split in the Ninth he opposed from his server in the article he wrote called Don't Split the Ninth Circuit. The files Kozinski was using are found here.

He denied knowing the "stuff" directory on his site was "public" then claimed "someone else did it."

But we've found a another piece of evidence. In June 2004, Alex Kozinski sent a public letter in HTML language, humorously nominating himself as part of a "Judicial Hottie contest"

Courthouse Forum: The Hot. Alex Kozinski

This letter contains links, and one sentence is:

" I bungee jump."

In there, "bungee jump" is linked to: http://alex.kozinski.com/stuff/jump.avi

Again, that's the key directory.

This shows that Judge Kozinski knew the general public could retrieve specific material from that directory, and in at least that case he invited the public to do so.

Alex Kozinski, last year, was also hand-picked to decide U.S. appeal case 04-50189, U.S. v Sutcliffe, a watershed, "sea change" case in the law of Internet jurisdiction, affecting millions of Americans lives and freedoms. How ironic Kozinski's decision in that case now could land him in prison (MP3) under his "circumstantial inference rejection."

During oral arguments in case 04-50189, where jurisdiction had yet to be ruled on yet, Judge Alex, Stephen S.Trott, and the ringer they brought in from out of state to "visit," who knew nada about computer MAC address, FTP or IP address, Monroe G. McKay, to induce a little, good ol' days nostalgia about telephones, to help them invoke jurisdiction and obtain the power to "shut down" the Internet, which conveniently ignores law which requires specific intent and proof the accused transmitted, i.e., "loaded" the offending speech being called illegal. McKay prefers to use "circumstantial" evidence as a standard to convict Citizens. Listen here. But there was a lot of ignoring of the law in this case.

They drool at such power. They know how to weld the tool to suppress speech. That's why this judge now claims he accidentally loaded the images.

BY THE WAY, THAT IS NOT HIS WIFE ABOVE.

 

 

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.

But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!

HE CAN'T DENY THE REVENGE THING!

MAYBE HE WOULD NEVER CONFESS...BUT ONE OF YOU WILL!! AND THAT'S A FACT! OR SOMEONE ELSE IS GOING TO DIE IN 2010.

 

DOJ: Department of Jihad?

A TEST

As discussed below, our newly stated “abuse of discretion” test (.pdf) requires us first to consider whether the district court identified the correct legal standard for decision of the issue before it. Second, the test then requires us to determine whether the district court’s findings of fact, and its application of those findings of fact to the correct legal standard, were illogical, implausible, or without support in inferences that may be drawn from facts in the record.

 

"In a free market economy, the ability to give and receive information about commercial matters may be as important, sometimes more important, than expression of a political, artistic, or religious nature." ~Alex Kozinski

 

SAY WHAT?

"This case should demonstrate that the FBI will "not" pursue all allegations of judicial corruption vigorously, as public corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society," said John F. Pikus, special agent in charge of the Albany division, in a prepared statement.

 

"Besides, we would have to lock them all up and there would be just one left in the courthouses across America." And that's the end of it.

SAY WHAT?

"The prospect of tyranny may not grab the headlines the way vivid stories of gun crime routinely do. But few saw the Third Reich coming until it was too late. The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed — where the government refuses to stand for reelection and silences those who protest; where courts have lost the courage to oppose, or can find no one to enforce their decrees. However improbable these contingencies may seem today, facing them unprepared is a mistake a free people get to make only once." ~Alex Kozinski

Alex Kozinski a.k.a. Another Computer "Expert."

In the sound byte on this page he wax's on about how, "If [killercop] was gonna testify..."

This clearly shows Alex never read the trial files, otherwise he would have known Killercop never did testify.

Especially after Alex's good buddy, in the lower Central District Federal Court, Judge A. Howard Matz, denied Killercop Due Process (.pdf) and Assistance of Counsel, inter alia. Not to mention the willful and vindictive illegal sentence. Did I forget to mention this illegal act, too? And he forces counsel on people too!

Alex Kozinski (above), with his arm around his good buddy, A. Howard Matz, is a "conservative" appointee of former president Ronald Reagan, who is chief of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, transmitted in interstate commerce, photos of naked women standing on all fours and painted to look like cows, as well as a videos of half-naked men with sexually aroused farm animals. And that's the end of it.

A step-by-step pictorial depicted a woman shaving her pubic hair and other images showed masturbation and what one news paper called "contortionist sex."

The images were posted to a sub domain of the judge's web site that could only be accessed by directly typing in the correct URL. The domain, however, was not password-protected. In addition to the pornographic images, the sub domain contained legal writings, music files and the judge's personal photos.

The judge told the Times that he accidentally loaded the images to his server and would not have intentionally posted them.

Judge Kozinski claims defense that "others might have loaded the porn images."

We find that funny since his court jester Sung Park claimed in the criminal appeal of killercop.com the exact same theory, but was denied by the Wizard Of Koz.

Can't he use now Kozinski's defense, that, "I had no idea, but that sounds right, because I sure don't remember putting some of that stuff there?"

Alex Kozinski claims ignorance of the crime, while his good buddy, A. Howard Matz, claims ignorance of the law. Opps, that was supposed to be a secret!! (.pdf)

Kozinski said he thought some of the photos were "funny" but acknowledged that the photo of the women painted as cows was "degrading" and "gross." He said, however, that he didn't think the images were obscene.

Another site reported that there was a folder "which included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal.

Some of the material was inappropriate, he conceded, although he defended other sexually explicit content as 'funny.'

What “Stuff” was on Judge Kozinski’s Personal Website?

Did you stumble across any of the judge's perverted and "obscene" pornographic pictures and movies, before he realized he was caught? Ever trade with him?

Since when is cavorting with farm animals part of everyday life?

"The sexually explicit material on the site was extensive, including images of masturbation, public sex and contortionist sex. There was a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, and a folder that contained a series of photos of women's crotches in snug-fitting clothing or underwear."

THE BOTTOM LINE:

We at killercop.com mooooooove that Kozinski be remooooooved from the bench and indicted forthwith for his double standards under the law. That's just this man's perspective.

At least until you change the very words of the law.

15 of the 16 cases?

Oh My Gawd!

And that's the end of i.T.

Or So It Seems.

25 Rules Of The Game For Catching Wild Pigs

 

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.