FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

PRUDENT: pru·dent
/pro͞odnt/
adjective: prudent
acting with or showing care and thought for the future.


PROMPTLY ON THE RECORD WITH FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ

SUMMER 2002

"For you to go to bat and take the case to trial or even to pursue a plea, if that's what you were alluding to before, with these lawyers is going to be totally against your interest and against my duty to assure that you get effective assistance of counsel." ~Judge A. Howard Matz. Summer of 2002, pre-trial of Killercop.

 

08.22.2002

Page 20, Lines 16-19
Judge A. Howard Matz:

"If you had said to me judge, I want to be my own lawyer, I would have spent a half hour explaining to you why that would be an absolutely mistaken decision on your part."

Page 20, Lines 24-25 Judge A. Howard Matz:

"If you are not seeking to represent yourself you're making a wise decision"

Page 32, Lines 13-14
Judge A. Howard Matz:

"What about you, Killercop?"

Killercop: "I’m just a cog in the wheel at this point."


ENTER TOTALLY INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE.

WINTER 2002

"So that's one alternative. You get another lawyer. But you get-that lawyer, and it could be a man or a woman, on the basis and in the manner I just described. In principle, the alternative to you having another lawyer derived from that method is to represent yourself. I don't know whether that's what you're seeking." I really don't understand what you're seeking.

But if that's what you're seeking, then I would do my best to bang you on the head and kick you on the shins, and I'm speaking figuratively, I don't mean that literally, talk you out-of-that, BECAUSE it would be TOTALLY against your interests." ~Judge A. Howard Matz. Winter of 2002, pre-trial of Killercop.

 

Note: Matz Lost Me @ "I really don't understand...,"

 

A MISUNDERSTANDING?

 

08.27.2003

Page 62, Lines 14-17

Judge A. Howard Matz:

"Okay. Well, I’ve already told you, as you acknowledged earlier today, KILLERCOP, that any individual who chooses to proceed on his own was taking enormous risks and subjecting himself to a CONSIDERABLE disadvantage."

NOW AND THEN


THIS PAGE SPONSORED BY FARETTA AND THE JUDGES WHO FOLLOW IT.

It is too bad he wasn't in the same mood to make me that offer when he FORCED a lawyer on me.

Matz likes secrets, a more stupefyingly, cryptic euphemism I have yet to behold. Oh, I spoke too soon.

"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)


OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA


REASONABLE DOUBT


"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.
Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer


(c) 1995-2026

All Rights Reserved

WELCOME TO THE NINTH CIRCUIT OF HELL

"Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes, and prudent in their own sight!"

He who is prudent and lies in wait for an enemy who is not, will be victorious. -Sun Tzu

 

judge A. Howard Matz says...

"So a prudent thing to do for somebody in your situation would be is I'll take my best shot at it. You can take your best shot at being your own lawyer, if you want, or you can be a lawyer." ~Judge A. Howard Matz. Sept. 26, 2003, right after having me committed for a mental treatment in his secret hearing.


Prudent to take my best shot? Okay! Don't duck!!

HMMMMMMM, SOUNDS TO ME LIKE HOWARD MATZ IS "PROVIDING LEGAL ADVICE"...AND ISN'T THAT AGAINST THE LAW? LET'S DOUBLE CHECK OUR FACTS, YEP.

BUT LET'S BE PRUDENT AND CHECK ONE MORE TIME...YUP, IT STILL IS. NO LEGAL ADVICE FROM THE BENCH ALLOWED. JUDGE MATZ CLEARLY NEVER READ THE LAW.

AND HE IS MOST LIKELY A CRIMINAL.

SCRATCH THAT, IS A CRIMINAL.

IS THAT CRAZY OR WHAT? "CAUSE I KNOW THEY ALL READ IT.

HECK, HE WROTE IT!

SO NOW THE ONLY QUESTION I HAVE FOR HIZZZ ODER IS WHY THAT CHOICE?


08.27.2003

FRAUD ON THE COURT. LIE #1

08.27.2003:
Page 60, Lines 15-17
Judge: "Killercop, as the record amply demonstrates, has gone through four attorneys; he’s fought with all of them; he’s insisted on firing all of them. Page 62, Lines 14-17

01.14.2003

Page 14
Judge Matz: In principle, the alternative to you having another lawyer derived from that method is to represent yourself. I don’t know whether that’s what you’re seeking. I really don’t understand what you’re seeking. But if that’s what you’re seeking, then I would do my best to bang you on the head and kick you on the skins(sic), and I’m speaking figuratively, I don’t mean that literally, talk you out of that. Because it would be totally against your interests.

Now you really need to tell me what you want as between those two alternatives.

It’s no longer a question of you or Mr. Harris."

Page 18
Judge: "You don’t think you have the ability to defend yourself against the United States of America, and you’re right about that. I agree with you 100 percent." "It would be crazy to do it…"


  Actually and factually KILLERCOP begged the court to not remove the original first attorneys at the September 23, 2002 hearing, page 18, Line 7-10.

September 23, 2002

"I would therefore request respectfully this court order the Public Defender’s Office to BE prepared to try the case on October 22 [2002] as so [previously] ordered and to DENY any motion to be relieved."

MOTION DENIED!!!!

A FRAUD UPON YOUR COURT, AMERICA

LAW BOOKS

The law of unintended consequences is an adage or idiomatic warning that an intervention in a complex system always creates unanticipated and often undesirable outcomes.


1984 Thoughts

NOT ONLY IS HOWARD MATZ INCOMPETENT, HE IS "@#$%^ RETARDLY HANDING OUT ILLEGAL SENTENCES.

JUST ASK FARETTA.

JUST THE FACTS, MAM. JUST THE FACTS

FACT: KILLERCOP HAS 6500 ADDITIONAL FACTS YOU MIGHT WANT TO SEE TO UNDERSTAND, AS I PROVE MY CASE TO YOU THE PEOPLE, THAT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT LIED TO YOU, TOO.

BOLDLY LIED, AND WORSE, I MIGHT ADD.

NOW ASK THEM WTF WERE THEY THINKING??? BEFORE SOMEONE DIES.

Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)


CONTACT


COLLECT A BOUNTY

COLLECT A REWARD


FILE A COMPLAINT


Buy Killercop a Coffee

TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE

(c) 1995-2026

All Rights Reserved