 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
ANOTHER UNLAWFUL HEARING BY JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ? YES. INCOMPETENCE 18 USC 4241(e) Discharge.— When the director of the facility in which Killercop is hospitalized [pursuant to subsection (d)] determines that the defendant has recovered to such an extent that he is able to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him and to assist properly in his defense, he shall promptly file a certificate to that effect with the clerk of the court that ordered the commitment. The clerk shall send a copy of the certificate to the defendant's counsel and to the attorney for the Government. The court shall [then]hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247 (d)
ALL 3 KNEW THAT LAW AND BROKE IT Martin v. Settle, 192 F.Supp. 156, 159 (W.D. Mo. 1961) (competency hearing may not be conducted in absence of the defendant and doing so deprives the defendant of due process of law).
There are a number of questions that evaluators might seek to answer when making a competency determination. Does the Judge understand the charges? Does he appreciate the possible penalties? Does he appreciate the adversarial nature of the courtroom? Can he discuss legal strategy? Can he behave appropriately in the courtroom? Can he provide meaningful testimony in his own defense? But first you have to capture him and make them a captive! Then you may make him subject to your evil tests and treatments to restore him. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
THE CASE OF PROMPLY SCHMOMPLY A.K.A. WHEN IS AN ORDER NOT AN ORDER? WHEN JUDGE HOWARD MATZ IS PLAYING COVER UP NOT STICKING HIS NECK OUT FURTHER.
KILLERCOP: "I'd also like the record to reflect that this court, on April 7, ordered the transcript of the hearing of April 7 to be provided to Dr. Patenaude and Killercop quote, unquote, promptly. I did not receive a copy of that secret hearing of April 7, where my presence was not, supposedly, required for almost eight weeks."
JUDGE MATZ: "All right. Now, Killercop, I'm not going to be open to repeated or maybe to any additional gratuitous volunteered statements which are not relevant to whatever is being discussed at a particular time. Your 'gripe' about Mr. Nicolaysen will be addressed very shortly because of the fact that on the agenda for this morning's hearing, that motion is one of the items. "
HOW HE HANDLES "THE GRIPE" Killercop: " I'm just letting the court know that I'm standing, and that is my way of not interrupting, not having an "outburst," but I want the court to recognize that when I stand, I have an objection which I wish to make on the record. First off, I object that his motion is going in front of my motion. My motion to recuse him for ineffective assistance of counsel predates his. I'd like to be heard first. First in line, first served."
THE COURT LATER IGNORES THIS, HEARS AND GRANTS GREG'S MOTION TO BE RELIEVED, BEFORE MINE, THEN RELEASED GREG, WITHOUT DEALING WITH "THE GRIPE." HE AVOIDS MOST ISSUES DURING A COVER UP. HE'S ON A ROLL. THEY ALL WERE. THEY JUST FORGOT TO READ THE LAW AND STUDY IN THE ENGLISH. SO THEY DECIDED TO "PRACTICE" ON ME AND MY FAMILY.
NICE COVER UP, AGAIN, HOWARD. YA LITTLE GOBLIN! NOW GIVE ME THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW, OR ADMIT EVERYTHING AFTER THE DENIAL WAS UNLAWFUL AND ILLEGAL.
Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
