Move along, folks... Nothing to be found here.

 

FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998

FACTS

 
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

THE FIRST LOOMS, WAITING TO BE STOLEN BY THE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS

MATZ HAD AN IDEA.

BUT IT JUST LOOMED AND LOOMED, THEN IT LOOMED THERE SOME MORE.

 

HEAR, SEE, KNOW NOTHING

 

("The very purpose of the First Amendment is to foreclose public authority from assuming a guardianship of the public mind through regulating the press, speech, and religion.

 

To this end, the government, even with the purest of motives, may not substitute its judgment as to how best to speak for that of speakers and listeners[.]") (Citation and internal quotation marks omitted);

 

JUDGE MATZ FRAUD

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:

"That may be part of your defense but now I think we're going beyond where I should at this point.

 

Your speech rights may or may not be involved by these charges."

 

FUCK YOU!

 

KILLERCOP: "Well --"


JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Don't interrupt me!!~Judge Matz, U.S. v Killercop.com, AUGUST 22, 2002

 

SO MUCH FOR THE WORDS "MAY" AND "NO." AND "NOT." A REGULAR "CORP D' ETAT."

How_I_Narrowly_Escaped_Insanity

ONCE UPON A TIME... MY RIGHTS WERE INVOLVED! BUT THAT WAS THEN AND THIS IS NOW. AND NOW I HAVE COME FULL CIRCLE!

 

A WISE GUY

Did you know you could be convicted [by a jury] for filing a knowingly false complaint of peace officer misconduct in violation of California Penal Code section 148.6(a)(1)?

 

 

THERE IT IS LOOMING!

 

"And thereby you can keep out, possibly keep out reference to the admittedly volatile and potentially explosive term KILLERCOP.com." ~Judge A. Howard Matz

NO MEANS NO

 

“The Framers [of the Constitution] knew that free speech is the friend of change and revolution. But they also knew that it is always the deadliest enemy of tyranny.”

 

NO MEANS NO

"BUT THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS LOOMING THERE AS A GLOBAL CONTEXT FOR THE ENTIRE PROSECUTION. AND, THEN, YOU'RE RIGHT, IT DOES APPEAR, AT LEAST THERE'S SOME SUGGESTION, THAT KILLERCOP WOULD HOLD SOME UNCONVENTIONAL VIEWS. BUT NEITHER IS THAT CRIMINAL -- WHICH NO ONE IS SUGGESTING AT ALL -- NOR IS IT DANGEROUS." ~Federal Judge A. Howard Matz. Central District, California. Pg 59, APRIL 12, 2002 Case: CR 02-350-AHM

FUNNY, THAT SECRET PSR HERE SUGGESTS OTHERWISE.

 

AS DID THESE SOME OF THESE PEOPLE.

 

I DON'T LIKE YER PEEPS! YER LKE AN UNLAWFUL GANG!

 

A LITTLE GOBLIN

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Where is the information about the investigation of that, where in the record is that?


MS. POTASHNER: I don't have a cite for where it is.

 

MS. DUARTE: Your Honor, you mean in the
preliminary hearing?

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Before me.

 

MS. DUARTE: In the complaint about the
Killercop.com investigation.

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Where?

 

MS. DUARTE: Toward the end, Page 20 of the
complaint, Paragraph 28, previous threatening activity.

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: And KILLERCOP.com is on Page 21. Top of page 21.

 

MS. DUARTE: Yes, Your Honor. Begins on Page 21.

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: It's consistent with what you say, Ms. Potashner because it looks like the L.A.P.D. was successful in having the KILLERCOP website removed from the host site. Is that correct?

 

MS. POTASHNER: I believe so, yes.

 

MS. DUARTE: I believe that's correct, Your Honor. I don't know details about if and why the case was reviewed or declined by the DA'S office.

 

 

~Federal Judge A. Howard Matz

"...[w]ithout using the KILLERCOP.com, what
the web site was about and that contained the statements about his being serious and the like, I would consider, I'm not necessarily requiring this of the government but I would consider limiting the government to introducing that
stipulation. And thereby you can keep out, possibly keep out reference to the admittedly volatile and potentially explosive term KILLERCOP.com.

 

This is an element of evidence that it's permissible for the jury to consider and I grant the motion under those terms." ~Federal Judge A. Howard Matz. Central District, California. Pretrial of Killercop

 

JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ:" When the jury receives information about killercop.com, ...[t]hey're going to be reminded about that in a general way when they're instructed at the end of the case, that if evidence was admitted for a limited purpose only, it can be used only for that purpose. They can't consider [the admittedly volatile and potentially explosive term KILLERCOP.com] whatever the evidence may show about your involvement with killercop.com to reach some conclusion that you were inclined -- that is what the propensity means -- to commit a crime."

 

 

Folks, this is arrogance at it's height.