Federal Bureau Of Ignorance? Or Idiots?

2 men accused of killing woman, while the F.B.I. were too busy making Power Point Presentations!

Jackson said she sent the e-mails to the FBI agent who was investigating the deaths of Risken's two husbands, but never heard from him. "I'm pretty bitter about the FBI," she said. "They were handed, on a silver platter, information that someone was going to kill Sonia. All those e-mails sent to me were sent directly to the FBI, and not once was I contacted."

Laura Eimiller, an FBI spokeswoman, said, "The agent did receive the e-mails." This was determined after an investigation into the MAC address.

(Recess taken at 8:14 a.m. to 8:33 a.m.) (Jury in. ) THE COURT: The jury is in the box. Each person is in his or her respective seat. The witness is on the stand. F.B.I. AGENT JEFFREY CUGNO, GOVERNMENT'S WITNESS, PREVIOUSLY SWORN:

 

CROSS-EXAMINATION BY KILLERCOP:

 

Did you learn on 12-28 that Killercop was in Mass based on the statement from Mrs. Greenwood that an e-mail --
THE COURT: Not what it was based on. Did you learn it or not?
THE WITNESS: I did.

 

BY KILLERCOP:
Q And you learned it based on her statement to you that she
had learned that from an e-mail sent last week; correct?
A That's what I wrote.
Q That's what you wrote. Okay.
And you wrote it down in this report; correct?
A I believe I did.

 

Q Did she indicate an e-mail that she was talking about?
A She might have. I don't believe I made a note in my notes there.

Q Correct me if I'm wrong, you are looking for me? You are looking for the defendant -- correct? -- at this point in time?

A Yes, I am.

Q And she's telling you that "He's in Massachusetts, correct?

A That's where she believed you were.

 

Q Based on this e-mail from last week, the previous week?

A That's what she had noted.

Q Now, I'd like to direct your attention to page 1.

THE COURT: No. Just ask him the fact or a question about --

 

BY KILLERCOP:

Q Did Mrs. Greenwood tell you that an employee from the Denver office had sent a threatening e-mail to Killercop?

A Yes, I believe that's what she said.

 

Q Can you tell me why your notes say, "An employee from the Denver office has sent a threatening e-mail to"... and then stops?

 

MS. DUARTE: Objection. It's irrelevant.

 

THE COURT: Sustained.

 

Q Did you white out that -- did you white it out in your notes?

 

MS. DUARTE: Same objection, Your Honor.

 

THE COURT: Sustained.

 

Q When you wrote this report, did you note that fact in here, that "An employee from the Denver office had sent a threatening e-mail to Killercop?

 

A I believe I did.

 

MS. DUARTE: Objection. Irrelevant, Your Honor.

 

THE COURT: Sustained.

BY KILLERCOP:
Q When you wrote your summation of your report on December 31st, did you include mention of any threats to Killercop?

A I don't believe I did.

Q Now, you said you believed that you did write in this report that "An employee from the Denver office had sent a threatening e-mail to Killercop." Let's look at the report you typed up from Mrs. Greenwood. I'm going to direct your attention to this paragraph right here. One second, Your Honor. I'd like to direct your attention to this last paragraph -- the second to the last paragraph here. Do you see that paragraph where it starts at "however?

A Yes, I do see that.

 

Q Did you write that?

 

A I did.

 

Q Does that reflect exactly what you just testified to and what's in your records here?

 

A I said I believed I had put that, but apparently I did not include that.

 

Q Isn't it a fact that you put, "Killercop threatened an employee in Denver?

 

A It looks like I wrote --

 

Q Did you type in here that "Global Crossing was able to locate killercop through an e-mail he sent -- 'he' being killercop -- "to an upset Global Crossing employee in the Denver office?

 

A That's what I wrote.

 

Q Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but your report that -- your handwritten note says, "An employee from the Denver officc sent a threatening e-mail to," and then it kind of stops there.

 

It's missing.

 

But that's what you are talking about -- right? -- "An employee from the Denver office sent a threatening e-mail? But the way you wrote it up here says, "Global Crossing was able to locate killercop through an e-mail 'he sent to an upset Global Crossing employee in the Denver office.'

That's not exactly what's true, in your notes, is it?

 

A No. It appears I made a mistake.

 

Q That's a big mistake, isn't it?

 

A I made a mistake.

 

So the answer to the original question of, "when you wrote this report, did you note that fact in here, that "An employee from the Denver office had sent a threatening e-mail to Killercop?" would be a no.

How nice to selectively ignore the words you choose to inforce. (.pdf)

Twice. "Well, Mr. Big Brother F.B.I. man, let's try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well."

Transcript of 11.19.2003

Page 1184, Lines 1-15
Killercop: Jeff, aren't you taught to follow leads?

MS. DUARTE: Objection. Irrelevant.

THE COURT: Killercop, the [non] investigations culminated in circumstances that led us to this trial. Please focus on those circumstances.

We are not here, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, because there is some claim that the FBI committed malpractice or negligence and it's important to understand whether they adhered to a reasonable standard of care. That is not what this case is about. And whether somebody thinks that the investigation could have been conducted differently or should have been conducted differently or had somebody else been in charge, would have been conducted differently, is totally irrelevant.

Page 1197, Lines 2-6
Judge: “It is irrelevant. Ladies and gentlemen - - I won’t say it again. It’s irrelevant.  Move on, Killercop. No sidebars, period.  Zero, none.  Move on.

Page 1211, Lines 8-25 and Page 1212, Lines 1-14
Judge: “There is no basis whatsoever for you to engage in inquires that are part of what you think is evidence that would support a claim of selective prosecution.” Id.
1211 at lines 8-10

No? How about a stupid one then?

Definietly a mistake.

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.

But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!

When police get murdered, or even an allegation of a murder of a police officer is made, in America, the F.B.I. take tips and investigate. Or so you like to believe... would you belive they don't? It gets worse...

EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE:

MURDER INVESTIGATION

Pompano Beach, Florida
August 10, 2007

VICTIM - SERGEANT CHRISTOPHER REYKA

State and federal law enforcement authorities in Florida are seeking information regarding unknown suspect(s) responsible for the murder of Broward County Sheriff's Office Sergeant Christopher Reyka.

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $50,000 for information resulting in the identification and arrest of individual(s) responsible for the murder of Sergeant Reyka.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

These are photographs of the vehicle that the unknown suspect(s) were last seen driving. The vehicle is described as a late 1998 to early 2000 Ford Crown Victoria or a 1995 to 2004 Mercury Grand Marquis.

THE UNKNOWN SUSPECT(S) SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS.

END OF EXAMPLE:

Now, when you couple a murder allegation to the F.B.I., by the police nonetheless, together with another allegation of the same suspect "selling weapons" (ITAR), then you can bet the F.B.I. will really take notice and investigate, right? Naaaaaaaa. It gets worse...

MURDER AND ITAR DOCUMENT

If that is not enough to get the Bureau of "Investigations" to investigate, how about on top of those we throw in another allegation of the same suspect doing Interstate Extortion, and, just for good measure, Interstate Threats all at the same time. Good Golly Miss Molly! That should get them to investigate, right?? Naaaaa. No according to Special Ken, an F.B.I accountant. He testified at my trial, in between making spiffy Power Point Presentations for his corporate masters, who have bought and paid for him.

EXTORTION AND THREATS DOCUMENT

NOTE: "THEIR OWN 'INVESTIGATION'"

So does anyone really believe this statement below, from F.B.I. Special Agent Kenneth G. McGuire, that the F.B.I. never opened an investigation into killercop.com back in 1998?

That's his story (see below).

Maybe he was too busy creating pretty Microsoft PowerPoint Presentations for the Corporation$ instead of conducting investigations? FYI: Sutcliffe's signature on there is a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A.

Are you guys now the Federal Bureau of Presentations (F.B.P.)?

JUDGE MATZ, IN THE VERY NEXT PAGE THEN HELPED HIM COVER UP THESE HATE CRIMES.

JUDGE MATZ, MORE IMPORTANTLY, IN THE VERY NEXT PAGE, THEN HELPED HIM further COVER UP THE COPS CRIMES AND THE FAILURE OF THE F.B.I. TO INVESTIGATE WHAT CLEARLY FALLS UNDER F.B.I. JURISDICTION.

WHY WOULD HE LIE TO A FEDERAL JUDGE AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT THIS, WHEN CLEARLY THERE WAS AN F.B.I. INVESTIGATION, AS SEEN AND NOTED ABOVE?

ANSWER:

BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THE F.B.I. WERE INVOLVED IN THE UNLAWFUL RAID OF THIS SITE IN 1998. AND BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO COVER UP WHAT THEY FOUND HERE.

AND HELP WITH THEIR SELECTIVE PROSECUTION.

AND THE TORTURE.

AND DEBBIE SURE DIDN'T CARE

AND WHY WOULD JUDGE MATZ ALLOW DEBBIE'S ASSISTANT, ELENA DUARTE, TO LIE TO HIM, WHEN SPECIAL KEN FIRST LIED IN OPEN COURT THAT "THERE WAS ONLY A COUPLE OF LINES OF COMPUTER CODE RELATED TO THIS WEBSITE," ONLY TO BE CAUGHT AND BE MADE TO COUGH UP THE FILES, AND A LOT MORE WHICH YOU ARE NOW WITNESSING ABOVE? AND WHY DIDN'T MATZ CHARGE HIM WITH THE LIE?

MAYBE BECAUSE JUDGE MATZ DOESN'T FOLLOW THE LAW.

IS THAT WHAT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CALLS [EQUAL] PROTECTION AND [DUE] PROCESS UNDER THE LAW?

HERE ARE THE PRE-TRIAL, TRIAL, AND APPEALS FILES AND OUR PERSONAL FAVORITE, THE SECRET HEARING.

HOW WOULD YOU LIKE IT IF SOMEONE RAIDED YOUR FILES UNLAWFULLY?

I KNOW YA'LL SAW THIS FILE:

From - Sat Apr 11 19:57:39 1998

Return-Path: <jdarr@erols.com>Received: from smtp3.erols.com ([207.172.3.236]) by diane.netcbc.com(post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-14094) with ESMTP id AAA273 for <killercop@killercop.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 1998 16:23:31 -0700Message-ID: <352EC6BE.1DA3@erols.com>

 

Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 21:26:22 -0400From: John Darr > Reply-To: jdarr@erols.com

To: killercop@killercop.com

I still don't understand why people whine when the supreme race does the right thing and puts niggers in their place. Somalia was probably the best time of my life. Everyday we got to bust some niggers. Man, a .300 Win Mag opens there head up like a watermelon dropped on the sidewalk. Ah, but not long before we get to do the same thing here. But shoot straight nigger (yeah right) cause we don't miss.

Hope ur enjoying ur collard greens and fried chicken,

DA BOSS MAN

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.