“Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.”
A GUMP STATEMENT
“I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges, that have been filed against Mr. Sutcliffe that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all. So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a d(sic) fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.”
A GUMP STATEMENT (Part 2)
"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up big time." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz
SOURCE:
$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.
I know, it's complex. (.pdf)
But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.
But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!
|
MATZ THE COMPUTER GOD
AMEN
Transcript of 12.04.2002 Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM
Page 18, Lines 13-25
Judge Matz: “I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Mr. Sutcliffe that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all. So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a d(sic) fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a Perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.”
WELL THAT'S JUST DANDY!! SO LONG AS DUE PROCESS ENTITLES KILLERCOP TO YOUR "VIEW," AS A LEGAL DEFENSE, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE,
LETS ASK SOME OF HIS FRIENDS IF THEY FEEL, IN THEIR VIEW, IF THEY WOULD ACCEPT THAT, AS DUE PROCESS, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT GETS UNLIMITED EXPERTS.
WOULD YOU?
Prof. John C. Coffee, Ronald J. Nessim, Howard Matz , Robert S. Fink and Michael J. Madigan
BY THE WAY, HOWARD, NEVER DID FIND THAT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH, IN HERE.
ARE YA'LL STACKING THE DECK, OR YA JUST DON'T PLAIN CARE WHO KNOWS ANYMORE?
BUT EVEN A FIRST YEAR LAW STUDENT OF HARVARD KNOWS YOU WOULD BE STUPID TO COVERUP A CRIME. AND THAT IS A FACT.
SO IS THIS!
|
 |
