"If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may "presently" be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent" ~18 U.S.C. § 4241(a)."The court shall [THEN] hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(d), to determine the competency..."
THIS IS THE SAME JUDGE IN CHARGE OF THE MENTAL HEALTH OF YOUR CHILDREN, AMERICA.
"Right now I don’t think this case is ready for trial and much of the reason is not immediately attributable to you. Some of it is not attributable to you at all.All of this mysteriousconfusion about what happened to the evidence..." Page 55, Lines 4-16. 09.26.2003, Pretrial of Killercop.
A.K.A. Judge A. Howard Matz and his Little Chamber of Horrors
Los Angeles County lawyers agreed last week to guidelines intended to end a children’s mental-health-care system that critics say subjected young people to horrors far worse than what they would have faced had they simply been left alone.
In the settlement of In re Katie A., accepted by U.S. District Judge A. Howard Matz, the county agreed to try to provide decent mental-health services to children in their own homes whenever possible. County workers had allegedly identified children needing mental-health services and removed them from their families, often placing them in foster care or group homes where they faced physical and mental abuse — and still never got mental-health services.
An advisory board will oversee the settlement. But many advocates were left unsatisfied, including the attorney whose 2001 state-court suit paved the way for the later class action. Sanford Jossen noted that no deadlines have been given. He said advisory-board members would be paid thousands of dollars for their work, “but the kids get nothing.”
Don't feel so bad, Sanford Jossen , I got nothing either. Except a situation.
HAVING REVIEWEDTHAT,WE ACTUALLY ARE OF THE
OPINION -- AND I'LL TAKE AS MUCH RESPONSIBILITY AS I NEED TO FOR
THIS -- THAT THE ORDER THAT WAS SUBMIITED AND SIGNED ON MARCH
20TH, IS A LITTLE BIT OF A HYBRID, AND IT NEEDED TO BE CLARIFIED.
THE CASE OF "THEN" IS PAST, NOT PRESENT. EVEN A FIRST YEAR HARVARD LAW STUDENT KNOWS THAT.
"If there is reasonable cause to believe that the defendant may "presently" be suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent" ~18 U.S.C. § 4241(a)."
The court shall [NOW] hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(d), to determine the competency of the defendant.
MY "THEN" CONDITION? YOU MEAN THE ONE YOU JUST-THEN MADE UP?
ARE YOU BAFFLED AGAIN? IF YOU THOUGHT IT WAS BAD "THEN", YOU OUGHT TO SEE IT NOW! NOW AS IN "PRESENTLY." ARE YOU WITH ME HERE? STAY AWAKE! IT IS VITAL YOU LEARN.