It's the kind of limiting instruction --
I'll
tell you, you are allowed to take into account this evidence of
the rifle and of any evidence that there may be about
ammunition or other firearms, but only for the limited purpose
I just told you."

What Matz really said was,
"Before you proceed any further, please listen carefully, but fail to notice how I just changed gears there, with the rifle, just to scare and mislead you. Being a federal judge, I know that the Supreme Court has made very few rulings regarding the admission of evidence as a violation of due process. Although that Court has been clear that a writ should be issued when constitutional errors have rendered the trial fundamentally unfair, see Williams, 529 U.S. at 375, it has not yet made a clear ruling that admission of irrelevant or overtly prejudicial evidence constitutes a due process violation sufficient to warrant issuance of the writ. Absent such “'clearly' established Federal law,” nobody can conclude that my ruling was an “unreasonable application.” Muhahahaha!
Also, fail to notice that there is no element of 18 USC 875(c) about "'making or made' the communication. I just made that up. It's what I do, I just make stuff up as I go along, to ensure my wealthy friends stay out of hot water. with these guys.
I did that because we talked behind your back in secret, and we noticed that we heard the Government's expert talk about "make" or "made" pages, on the computer they siezed. But the Government's expert never said anything about what the law actually says and requires. Which is, 'whoever transmits... '
The accused would have argued this point, but I denied him any experts, and effective assistance of counsel. And since you know nothing of the secret hearing, or about the missing doctor, I will proceed as normal.
Now, jury, do my bidding, in the name of the law and the children. Even if that is not even what the law says it says. For I'm Harvard trained, and educated, and you are stupid drones to do my bidding, and the bidding of my masters.
Now go follow those crooked and corrupted jury instructions!" I am appointed for life and I am immune to justice!! Muhahahahaha!

FACT:
IN THE BLACK AND WHITE
Interstate Thought Crime 18 U.S.C.A. 875(c)
(c) Whoever transmits...
END TRANSMISSION IN BLACK AND WHITE:
Why the switch by Matz to "Whoever makes...?"
BLACK AND WHITE, BOTTOM-LINE:
Matz knew the government had no proof of a transmits, at the end of the trial-in-name-only, so he changed the words of the law.
He "rewrote the law." And hid the Nature.
He does things like that in his Secret Chamber...in his Mystical Realm of the Ninth. Killercop calls it a Star Chamber.
His "instruction" to the jury con-structively and structurely amended the indictment, when he again changed the "nature of the crime."
FEDERAL MODEL JURY INSTRUCTIONS 875(c)
He violated not only the letter of the law, but the "spirit of the law." Not to mention due process, his oath, and his own honor.
It didn't matter to him at this point, he was on a roll of corruption and ignoring the law.
Does no assistance of counsel, then forced counsel, then no counsel, in a complex computer case, of an incompetent, indigent defendant, denied computer experts, and "treated back to competency by a Doctor who didn't exist, strike anyone but me as even a tad odd?
Seriously, this still stands today as he refuses to correct it.
CONTACT ME, IF YOU CAN.
DId I mention I have a CD-ROM? But like the law, it is worthless, unless you are rich and powerful, corrupted and unjust.
But that's our little secret. Right, gang?
CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.
Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.
Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.
How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.
My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.