"THE LAW IS 'PRETTY CLEAR,' AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 CASE FILE:

US v KILLERCOP.COM

Judge Matz

The sun no longer shows his face, and treason sows his secret seeds that no man can detect. Might is right, and justice there is none. —Walther von der Vogelweide

Wouldn't you agree, Alvin, that:

“Judges must undertake a careful, balanced evaluation of the nature and strength of both the evidence the defense was prevented from presenting and the evidence each side presented at trial.” Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 435 (1995)

Alvin's Reply

"that's not an issue that I have to address and it's not a question I'm required to answer, so I decline to do so."

Folks, correct me if I'm wrong, but that is his function-in-life as a lifetime appointed federal judge, to "settle disputes in the law and answer questions of the law." Right? Then tell me, America, why is he guessing?

One sure can't have that service from either other branch of the so-called-government of the people, for the people and by the people.

His was another of the classic disinformationist tactics of the KKK.

Treason, too. At the least it's Misprision of felony.

We all know ignorance is no excuse.

But he won't tell you where his authority lies either. 'Cause it doesn't exist. Just like his Doctor, he didn't exist either.

Like two peas in a pod, Matz and Yang then go skipping off down the yellow brick road, all the while leaving a wake of destruction and secret hearings and cover ups behind them, as the say in the law, in toto. They are off to meet their good buddy and friend, the Wizard Of Koz!

A GUMP STATEMENT

“I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges, that have been filed against Killercop that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all.

So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a d(sic) fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.” ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up big time." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz

SOURCE:

“a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his ... right to retained or appointed counsel.” 384 U.S. 436, 475 (1966)

BURDEN???????????? HEAVY??????? HAHAHAHAHAHA! GOOD ONE!

I'M GOING TO BE "REAL CAREFUL" WITH THIS TERM AND SAY THERE IS "NO" BURDEN ON THIS GOVERNMENT AT ALL HERE.

Not just careful...but "real" careful.

SAY WHAT?

11.08.2004 (Pgs 8-9)

MATZ: "I think you need to be real careful in how you use some of these terms."

Mandamus is an “extraordinary remedy” that should be invoked only in “exceptional circumstances.” Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 95 (1967). It is the moving party’s burden to establish “that its right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 384 (1953) (internal quotation marks omitted). We consider five factors in assessing a mandamus petition:

(1) whether petitioner has no other adequate means, such as direct appeal, to obtain the requested relief;

(2) whether petitioner will be damaged or prejudiced in any way not correctable on appeal;

(3) whether the district court’s order is clearly erroneous as a matter of law;

(4) whether the district court’s order is an oft-repeated error or manifests a persistent disregard of the federal rules; and

(5) whether the district court’s order raises new and important problems or issues of first impression. Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977).

MATZ LINE OF THE TRIAL, IN NAME ONLY:

Transcript of 12.04.2002, Page 6, Lines 8-12

“The fact is that Killercop used not only entirely different language but was in a situation, was perceived to be in a situation, was none at the time of the indictment to be in a situation that there was no information suggesting Schmoe, whoever that is, was in.”

In a Federal court hearing an appeal, it is the duty of the judges to be certain of their jurisdiction. They have a legal duty to inspect the record of the District trial court, sua sponte, to determine whether the District trial court held jurisdiction at all times, if a Constitutional Right was violated, and/or if any officer of the court, whether judge or attorney, engaged in a "fraud upon the court".

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2010.

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another," person.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Then read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and babies! But always remember, children, evil only triumphs when good men or women do nothing.

THE END.

Judge A. Howard Matz

U.S., California Republic, Central District, Federal Judge.

SAY WHAT?

The following takes place on 09.26.2003

"HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL" ~Judge A. Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24

AND THAT'S A FACT YOU CAN'T DENY. BUT YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A DIFFERENT OPINION. BUT YOUR OPINION IS NOT REQUIRED HERE.

CALL JUDGE MATZ:

Telephone: 213-894-5283
Telephone: 213-894-2449

“My belief has always been . . . that wherever in this land any individual's fundamental constitutional rights are being denied, it is the obligation of the federal government -- at point of bayonet if necessary -- to restore that individual's constitutional rights.” ~ Ronald Reagan

"You have a right to a lawyer who provides effective assistance of counsel. That's a constitutional right you have. That doesn't mean that you have a right to have a lawyer, you or anyone has a right to have a lawyer do whatever you think should be done or not to do things that you don't want to be done."

 

Judge Alvin Howard Matz was the U.S. district court judge who lorded over the trial of killercop. The case was originally assigned to another court, but quickly given to his court thereafter. This is known as the "Fast Shuffle." A sort of legal re-shuffling of the deck, to re-stack it.

They did the same "Fast Shuffle" to get the Wizard Of Koz to hear the appeal. So the Wiz could cover it up. He's a freaking computer genius, too!

 

Like a tyrant judge Matz denied even the most basic American fundamental rights during the pretrial and trial, such as a right to a speedy trial, due process, effective assistance of the counsel and the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, which is criminal at least, treason at worst.

 

Due Process was a memory. He believe all of the preceeding words are entitlements he could bestow on me, or deny. I know my rights come from the God. Not him. But this guy that Matz forced on me hates Christians. His words, not mine.

HE HATES CHRISTIANS AND BLACK-AMERICANS?

At the outset of Killercop's trial, Judge A. Howard Matz was indifferent to the fact that a major metropolitan police department unlawfully removed this website in an unlawful raid, tortured me, and that the prosecutor was a judge named specifically within killercop.com with an axe to grind, along with the F.B.I. agents, sheriffs and cops of California, who had sent these emails to Killercop.

 

Section 245 of Title 18 U.S.C., one of the primary statutes used to combat racial and religious bias-motivated violence was well known to this so-called Federal Criminal Court Judge. He did all within his power of his office to cover up the F.B.I.'s crimes. Even letting this guy lie to him. And this guy hide.

 

It's the current statute which prohibits intentional interference, by force or threat of force, with the enjoyment of a Federal right or benefit (such as speech or work) on the basis of race, color.

 

He knows, he wrote the book.

SAY WHAT?

04.16.2002

Judge A. Howard Matz: “It’s consistent with what you say, Ms. Potashner because it looks like the LAPD was successful in having the Killercop website removed from the host site. Is that correct?”

Public Defender Potashner: “I believe so, yes.”

Prosecutor: “I believe that’s correct, Your Honor. ”

SAY WHAT, AGAIN?

09.26.2003

GOBLINS IN THE COURTROOM!!

OH MY!

Judge A. Howard Matz: "There seems to be a goblin surrounding this case."

SAY WHAT, SOME MORE?

09.26.2003

"THE LAW IS PRETTY CLEAR, AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24

SAY WHAT?

10.21.2003

Judge: “Now, I don’t think it is inappropriate for the record to note that I’ve previously authorized experts, or at least one expert, I didn’t go back and check the file but at least one expert, and I think could have been more then one somebody with specific skill and advanced skill in computer technology as well as to be appointed to represent or assist prior counsel. Have you seen any expert reports?”

Reed: “No. Not at all, Your Honor.”

Judge: “Has anybody discussed with you any of Killercop’s prior lawyers, any expert reports that may have been generated?”

Reed: “No, Your Honor.”

FRIVO-LUST

SAY WHAT?

04.15.2004

"If there were a crime, Mr. Killercop, that consisted of arrogance, I would depart upward to sentence you to a much longer [illegal] sentence."

Here is why he imposed the illegal sentence...for speech and non-speech, and various thought crimes, on recommendation of the probation department in their pre-sentence report. They were able to hide this from me until after I was sentenced. to keep my reply off the record.

Can you guess why Yang and Nicolaysen were treated like royalty by Lord Matz and forgiven by Lord Kozinski?

Here is a big hint for all you detectives, from the Board Of Governors. You used to be able to find the file above here until we exposed it, then it disappeared. A classic approach and a known disinformation tactic.

SAY WHAT?

07.19.2007

L. A. District Judge A. Howard Matz raised a more abstract concern when he said that using BlackBerry's inhibited his efforts to “preserve something akin to the majesty of the law.”

Matz is very busy playing with his jurisdiction and trying to discredit as many of his friends enemies as humanly possible.

 

Did we mention he changs the law to fit his lies?

 

Or else he just makes stuff up! But that is implicit, of course.

With friends like this, who needs enemies!

 

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

 

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum