Move along, folks... Nothing to be found here.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

c

Home | A Secret | A Mistake

A Cover Up | Jurisdiction | Woe

A Ring | Just 'cause | A Raid

| Corruption | Witch Hunt | Email | Videos | Fascists | A Rape

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! c c c
c

"THE LAW IS 'PRETTY CLEAR,' AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 CASE FILE:

US v KILLERCOP.COM

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


Judge Matz

A. Howard Matz

 

The sun no longer shows his face, and treason sows his secret seeds that no man can detect. Might is right, and justice there is none. —Walther von der Vogelweide

Wouldn't you agree, Alvin, that:

“Judges must undertake a careful, balanced evaluation of the nature and strength of both the evidence the defense was prevented from presenting and the evidence each side presented at trial.” Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 435 (1995)

Alvin's Reply

"that's not an issue that I have to address and it's not a question I'm required to answer, so I decline to do so."

Folks, correct us if we're wrong, but that is his function-in-life as a lifetime appointed federal judge, to "settle disputes in the law and answer questions of the law." Right?

One sure can't have that service from either other branch of the so-called-government of the people, for the people and by the people.

His was another of the classic disinformationist tactics of the KKK.

Treason, too. At the least it's Misprision of felony.

We all know ignorance is no excuse.

But he won't tell you where his authority lies either. 'Cause it doesn't exist. Just like his Doctor, he didn't exist either.


Like two peas in a pod, Matz and Yang then go skipping off down the yellow brick road, all the while leaving a wake of destruction and secret hearings and cover ups behind them, as the say in the law, in toto.


Forrest Gump

A GUMP STATEMENT

“I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges, that have been filed against Killercop that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all.

So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a d(sic) fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.”


"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up big time." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz

SOURCE:


“a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his ... right to retained or appointed counsel.” 384 U.S. 436, 475 (1966)

BURDEN???????????? HEAVY???????


I'M GOING TO BE REAL CAREFUL WITH THIS TERM AND SAY THERE IS "NO" BURDEN ON THIS GOVERNMENT AT ALL HERE.


Not just careful...but "real" careful.

SAY WHAT?

11.08.2004 (Pgs 8-9)

MATZ: "I think you need to be real careful in how you use some of these terms."


Mandamus is an “extraordinary remedy” that should be invoked only in “exceptional circumstances.” Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 95 (1967). It is the moving party’s burden to establish “that its right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 384 (1953) (internal quotation marks omitted). We consider five factors in assessing a mandamus petition:


(1) whether petitioner has no other adequate means, such as direct appeal, to obtain the requested relief;

(2) whether petitioner will be damaged or prejudiced in any way not correctable on appeal;

(3) whether the district court’s order is clearly erroneous as a matter of law;

(4) whether the district court’s order is an oft-repeated error or manifests a persistent disregard of the federal rules; and

(5) whether the district court’s order raises new and important problems or issues of first impression. Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977).


MATZ LINE OF THE TRIAL, IN NAME ONLY:

Transcript of 12.04.2002, Page 6, Lines 8-12

“The fact is that Killercop used not only entirely different language but was in a situation, was perceived to be in a situation, was none at the time of the indictment to be in a situation that there was no information suggesting Schmoe, whoever that is, was in.”


In a Federal court hearing an appeal, it is the duty of the judges to be certain of their jurisdiction. They have a legal duty to inspect the record of the District trial court, sua sponte, to determine whether the District trial court held jurisdiction at all times, if a Constitutional Right was violated, and/or if any officer of the court, whether judge or attorney, engaged in a "fraud upon the court".

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law. But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet?

"Did you know that threats are not inherently protected under the Constitution. If "coupled with violence" and the other elements, they can be proscribed, and they definitely can be the basis for a criminal prosecution."

I am going for a walk now, into the nature. Care to join me? You are entitled to come along only 'cause I say so, but you have no right. And it seems that's the end of IT. So just shut it down!

 

 

A. Howard Matz

U.S., California Republic, Central District, Federal Judge.



SAY WHAT?

09.26.2003

"HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL"

~Judge A. Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24


Ronald Reagan

“My belief has always been . . . that wherever in this land any individual's fundamental constitutional rights are being denied, it is the obligation of the federal government -- at point of bayonet if necessary -- to restore that individual's constitutional rights.” ~ Ronald Reagan



A. Howard Matz

Judge Alvin Howard Matz was the U.S. district court judge who lorded over the trial of killercop. The case was originally assigned to another court, but quickly given to his court thereafter. This is known as the "Fast Shuffle." A sort of legal re-shuffling of the deck, to re-stack it.

 

They did the same "Fast Shuffle" to get the Wizard Of Koz to hear the appeal. So the Wiz could cover it up. He's a freaking computer genius, too!

 

Like a tyrant judge Matz denied even the most basic American fundamental rights during the pretrial and trial, such as a right to a speedy trial, due process, effective assistance of the counsel and the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, which is criminal at least, treason at worst. Due Process was a memory. He believe all of the preceeding words are entitlements he could bestow on me, or deny. My rights come from God. Matz hates Christians. His words, not mine.



At the outset of Killercop's trial, Alvin Matz was indifferent to the fact that a police department unlawfully removed this website in an unlawful raid, tortured me, and that the prosecutor was a judge named specifically within killercop.com with an axe to grind, along with the F.B.I. agents, sheriffs and cops who had sent these emails to Killercop.

 

###Section 245 of Title 18 U.S.C., one of the primary statutes used to combat racial and religious bias-motivated violence was well know to this so-called Federal Criminal Court Judge. He did all within his power of his office to cover up the F.B.I.'s crimes. Even letting this guy lie to him. And this guy hide.

 

The current statute prohibits intentional interference, by force or threat of force, with the enjoyment of a Federal right or benefit (such as speech or work) on the basis of race, color.

 


SAY WHAT?

04.16.2002

Judge A. Howard Matz: “It’s consistent with what you say, Ms. Potashner because it looks like the LAPD was successful in having the Killercop website removed from the host site. Is that correct?”

Public Defender Potashner: “I believe so, yes.”

Prosecutor: “I believe that’s correct, Your Honor. ”


SAY WHAT, AGAIN?

09.26.2003

GOBLINS IN THE COURTROOM!!

OH MY!

Judge A. Howard Matz: "There seems to be a goblin surrounding this case."


SAY WHAT, SOME MORE?

09.26.2003

"THE LAW IS PRETTY CLEAR, AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24


SAY WHAT?

10.21.2003

Judge: “Now, I don’t think it is inappropriate for the record to note that I’ve previously authorized experts, or at least one expert, I didn’t go back and check the file but at least one expert, and I think could have been more then one somebody with specific skill and advanced skill in computer technology as well as to be appointed to represent or assist prior counsel. Have you seen any expert reports?”

Reed: “No. Not at all, Your Honor.”

Judge: “Has anybody discussed with you any of Killercop’s prior lawyers, any expert reports that may have been generated?”

Reed: “No, Your Honor.


FRIVO-LUST


The Wizard Of Koz

SAY WHAT?

04.15.2004

"If there were a crime, Mr. Killercop, that consisted of arrogance, I would depart upward to sentence you to a much longer [illegal] sentence."

Secret Reports

Here is why he imposed the illegal sentence...for speech and non-speech, and various thought crimes, on recommendation of the probation department in their pre-sentence report. They were able to hide this from me until after I was sentenced. to keep my reply off the record.


Can you guess why Yang and Nicolaysen were treated like royalty by Lord Matz and forgiven by Lord Kozinski?

Here is a big hint for all you detectives, from the Board Of Governors. You used to be able to find the file above here until we exposed it, then it disappeared. A classic approach at a known disinformation tactic.


SAY WHAT?

07.19.2007

L. A. District Judge A. Howard Matz raised a more abstract concern when he said that using BlackBerry's inhibited his efforts to “preserve something akin to the majesty of the law.”

 


Matz is very busy playing with his jurisdiction and trying to discredit as many of his friends enemies as humanly possible.

 

Did we mention he changed the law to fit the lie?


With friends like this, who needs enemies!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.