"I want to assure the court. We agonized over this." And This. And This. And This. And This. And This. And This. And This, too.

"At best, his extraordinary disregard for the constitutional role demonstrates incompetence; at worst, it creates the impression that he knowingly attempted to hide his most controversial work."

"His unwillingness to take seriously his obligation to protect these basic fundamental rights has potentially placed his court in jeopardy."

CALL JUDGE HOWARD MATZ IF YOU STILL OWN YOUR OWN HOME PHONE:

Telephone: 213-894-5283
Telephone: 213-894-2449

EMAIL JUDGE MATZ

ASK HIM WHAT HE IS SMOKING TODAY?

NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET:

MORE DENIAL OF A RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE NATURE OF THE CRIME.

INFORMATION!

HOW "NOVEL" AN IDEA

CONTACT KILLERCOP IF YOU CAN. PROMPTLY!!

IT'S A PRUDENT THING TO DO IN AMERICA IN 2011.

"You cannot adopt politics as a profession and remain honest."~Ambrose Gwinett Bierce

TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 241

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...

A SECRET FROM THE KEY OF THE KNOWLEDGE

SAY WHAT?

THE FOLLOWING UNLAWFUL HEARING TAKES PLACE ON 04.07.2003 IN A DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA DISTRICT COURT.

Judge A. Howard Matz: "The defendant's personal presence is not necessary, given that he's currently represented by Mr. Nicolaysen."

Nicolaysen: "Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding [of a fact] that you didn't make; however --"

Doctor Phil Says: Anything Coming Out Of The Mouth After "However," Negates Everything Before That Word.

Just Keeping It Real.

FOR THE RECORD.

"Counsel have not cited and we have been unable to find a single instance of a criminal hearing conducted in secret in any federal, state, or municipal court during the history of this country. Nor have we found any record of even one such secret criminal trial in England since abolition of the Court of Star Chamber in 1641, and whether that court ever convicted people secretly is in dispute. Summary "status conferences" for findings of "incompetence" have not been regarded as an exception to this universal rule against secret trials."

Image that..., a Star Chambers hearing, live...in America.

You don't even have to be there to be judged and examined and "found;" pardon the expression, "incompetent." Wish they could have found a law book instead. Maybe then they would have read it. Or did they? I guess we shall have to "agonize" over whether they did or did not, and whether my presense was necessary, under the law, "probably." But then again, that's probably not good enough.