defendant has a right to be present if his presence “Has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend against the charge”

 

Killercop:

" Until I'm found competent, I don't see how that is relevant. I have retained counsel. I would like counsel to come forward and represent me, Mr. McAfee in the background. "

 

 

Judge A. Howard Matz:

All right. Well, Mr. McAfee has no right -- no individual lawyer has a right, no individual "litigant" has a right, to have counsel represent that individual for limited purposes. But I also have the authority to permit it, and I, for pragmatic reasons, will permit it without in any way making any finding as to Mr. McAfee's competence to function in that capacity.

 

 

Due process of law, therefore, in the prosecution of contempt, except of that committed in open court, requires that the accused should be advised of the charges and have a reasonable opportunity to meet them by way of defense or explanation. We think this includes the assistance of counsel, if requested, and the right to call witnesses to give testimony, relevant either to the issue of complete exculpation or in extenuation of the offense and in mitigation of the penalty to be imposed. See Hollingsworth v. Duane, 12 Fed.Cas. 359, 360; In re Stewart, 118 La. 827; Ex parte Clark, 208 Mo. 121.
COOKE V. UNITED STATES, 267 U. S. 517 (1925)

 

 

Once again Matz is dead wrong. You do have a right, " to have Counsel assist you." It is called the Sixth Amendment. Something he calls an entitlement.(.pdf file) But then again, in his court, no one but rich people have rights.

Try to understand, Federal Judge Matz likes the feeling of the power to "purport to "create" rights." The persecution I was subjected to was all about power. I was never a "litigant." And it was about the jurisdiction of the "power to control the people and the Internet."

2010

There Will Be Blood.

Especially when the rules change, a lot!

"I remember one woman walking by," said Jason Washburn, a corporal in the US Marines who served three tours in Iraq. He told the audience at the Winter Soldier hearings that took place March 13-16, 2008, in Silver Spring, Maryland, "She was carrying a huge bag, and she looked like she was heading toward us, so we lit her up with the Mark 19, which is an automatic grenade launcher, and when the dust settled, we realized that the bag was full of groceries. She had been trying to bring us food and we blew her to pieces."

"During the course of my three tours, the rules of engagement changed a lot," Washburn's testimony continued, "The higher the threat the more viciously we were permitted and expected to respond. Something else we were encouraged to do, almost with a wink and nudge, was to carry 'drop weapons', or by my third tour, 'drop shovels'. We would carry these weapons or shovels with us because if we accidentally shot a civilian, we could just toss the weapon on the body, and make them look like an insurgent."

SOURCE:

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2010.

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another," person.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Then read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and babies! But always remember, children, evil only triumphs when good men or women do nothing.

THE END.

THE FACT IS HERE, AND THE FACT IS THERE IN THE BLACK AND WHITE

Defendant’s Presence

In General, Probably.

 

 

Martin v. Settle, 192 F.Supp. 156, 159 (W.D. Mo. 1961) (competency hearing may not
be conducted in absence of the defendant and doing so deprives the defendant of due process of law).

A defendant has the right to be present at every stage of the trial. The right is both constitutional and statutory. The constitutional right is based on the Fifth Amendment due process
clause and the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation. Under the Constitution, the defendant’s presence “is a condition of due
process to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence, and to that extent only.” United States v. Gagnon,
470 U.S. 522, 526 (1985) (quoting Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 108 (1934)). Thus, the Constitution does not guarantee that a criminal defendant be present at all stages of the trial but rather only at “critical stage[s].” La Crosse v. Kernan, 244 F.3d 702, 707-08 (9th Cir. 2001).

In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 819 n.15 (1975), the Supreme Court stated that a defendant has the “right to be present
at all stages of the trial where his absence might frustrate the fairness of the proceedings.” See also Fisher v. Roe, 263 F.3d 906, 914-15 (9th Cir. 2001) (citing Snyder, 291 U.S. at 105-06)
(defendant has a right to be present if his presence “has a relation, reasonably substantial, to the fullness of his opportunity to defend
against the charge”).

Rule 43(a), Fed. R. Crim. P., provides in part that a defendant must be present at every trial stage, including the jury impanelment and the return of the verdict and sentencing, unless
otherwise provided by the rules.

Rule 43(b)(3), Fed. R. Crim. P., provides in part that a defendant need not be present where the “proceeding involves only a conference or hearing on a question of law.”

SOURCE: A Manual on Jury Trial Procedures
Prepared by the Jury Instructions Committee
of the Ninth Circuit

Members:
Judge George H. King, Chair
Judge Roger L. Hunt
Judge Lawrence K. Karlton
Judge A. Howard Matz
Judge Jeffrey T. Miller
Judge Marsha J. Pechman
Magistrate Judge John Jelderks

 

"A conference or hearing 'only' on a question of law." Okay, the word 'only' appears "clearly defined" to me. Kinda like the word no. And the word all.

 

A.K.A. THE CASE OF "A FACTUAL QUESTION OF WHOIS CONFUSED"

 

So, is judge A. Howard Matz incompetent, or did he break the law, and conspire with two other attorneys to do it? He did arrange the secret hearing personally...Lets ask The Wise Latina. CONFUSIUS

 

Since, by Judge A. Howard Matz' own ruling and decree, the factual question and thereafter NATURAL illegal finding, of one of the people's competence, or incompetence, thus and therefore said people need not be present in the room, or even the same state, before ONE finds them "incompetent" enough to be sent off for a mental "treatment." And said treatment may begin at anytime, before the finding of a fact!

 

 

ANSWER: THE LAW IS CRYSTAL-CLEAR - INCOMPETENCE OF AMERICANS IS A QUESTION INVOLVING ONLY A FACT UNDER FEDERAL LAW. AND I HAD A RIGHT TO BE THERE TO CONFRONT. REMEMBER THAT RIGHT?

 

IT GOES HAND IN THE HAND WITH THE RIGHT TO COMPEL WITNESSES. THAT USED TO BE A PART OF THE PROCESS. LIKE THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL. BOTH NOW GONE! REDUCED TO ENTITLEMENTS.

 

NEVER ONE TO LET THE LAW, RULES OR FACTS GET IN THE WAY OF THE PARTY, OR A GOOD OL' BOY PERSECUTION/LYNCHING, MATZ BEGINS THE PARTY WITH PLAIN OL' DISINFORMATION AND BABBLING. AND LATER FLAT OUT GIBBERISH AND A LOT OF COVERING UP. THAT'S A FACT. THAT MUCH IS CLEAR.

 

NOW PROMPLY IGNORE THE LAW SOMEMORE!

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

 

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum