A motion under Faretta– must be "unequivocal."

Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz





Faretta says... "If a defendant persists in his choice to represent himself, that choice must be honored even if it is to his own detriment." Faretta, 422 U.S. at 834. Judge Matz says... Not in my court!!! $PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$ OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA "what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM A QUESTION FOR AMERICA: Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled. I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then... Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person" and "the person of another. STILL BAFFFLED? Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it! In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children! THE END.		A motion under Faretta– must be "unequivocal." Held: “We hold that while a defendant may invoke his or her self-representation rights..., the invocation must be unequivocal. Unequivocal admitting of no doubt or misunderstanding; having only one meaning or interpretation and leading to only one conclusion; "unequivocal evidence ... definitive: clearly defined or formulated; "the plain and unequivocal language of the laws"- R.B.Taney wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn According to one attorney, "This is a confusing and fuzzy area of law. A defendant can place conditions on self-representation and still make an unequivocal demand: e.g., “If I do not get new counsel, I want to represent myself.” Id. But, if the defendant states, “If I am appointed standby counsel, I would like to represent myself,” then he has made an equivocal demand and Faretta isn’t triggered. Id. (?!?) {As intuitive as “conditions precedent” in Property law.} The absurdity of this area of law is that these are usually indigent, uneducated clients who are struggling to speak to the court – often through a translator. Deciding Faretta on phrase placement by an inarticulate defendant is, essentially, a quiet way of avoiding the train wreck of self-representation: not a bad thing from a policy perspective, but a tough rule to understand. How to Use: Those who represent indigent defendants in federal court will wince in recognition at the Mendez-Sanchez fact pattern. In addition to its primary holding on Faretta invocation, the decision also has an interesting and lengthy discussion on the frequently-misunderstood (by clients) “right” to new counsel. Id. at 4-6. Judge Gould recites the three Prime factors in reviewing such motions: 1. the timeliness of the motion, 2. the inadequacy of the court’s inquiry, and 3. whether the conflict was so great “as to result in a complete break-down in communication and consequent inability to present a defense.” Id. at *4. In Judge Matz' case it was not minutes, not hours or even days, no inquiry, resulting in an admission of a technical "error." Harmless, no doubt. The only problem with that story is how such a brilliant, Harvard graduated Federal District judge of the most complex cases could make such a flagrant and simple "error" as the fundamental right to the assistance of counsel. ANSWER: He had to violate the right, in able to force this HACK on Killercop, as seen here. Then he could unlawfully release this guy, who then lost experts, and delay the trial, the one he already delayed and delayed and delayed. All done unlawfully. Both factually and without reason, or even law, as part of the plan to release Gary Winnick from my Federal subpoena. Sounds nutz, right? You ain't heard nothin' yet! My subpoena remains outstanding on Gary. So I told him to keep his dogs at bay, again. The Marshals were ordered not to assist, to compel my witness, so I guess I have to place another reward. Since they are busy watching me watching them watching me watching them. I feel so special. How you feeling?> Contempt Of Cop Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies... Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years... Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off... Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical... Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law. Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions. Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet. How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high. My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis. EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!! COWARDS!
		The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz. By Psych Ward Entertainment. Sign my Guestbook Contact \| Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved. Impressum