Page 18, Lines 13-25
Judge Matz: “I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Mr. Sutcliffe that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all. So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a d(sic) fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.”
WELL THAT'S DANDY, THEN!!
SO LONG AS DUE PROCESS ENTITLES KILLERCOP TO YOUR "VIEW," AS A LEGAL DEFENSE, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE!
LETS ASK SOME OF HIS FRIENDS IF THEY FEEL, IN THEIR VIEW, WOULD THEY ACCEPT THAT AS DUE PROCESS, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT GETS UNLIMITED EXPERTS?
BY THE WAY, I NEVER FOUND THAT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH, IN HERE ARE YA'LL STACKING THE DECK OR YA JUST DON'T CARE WHO KNOWS ANYMORE?
BUT EVEN A FIRST YEAR LAW STUDENT OF HARVARD KNOWS YOU WOULD BE INCOMPETENT TO COVER UP YOUR CRIME.
MORE ON MATZ HERE: AND HERE
The following are actual statements made during court cases:
Judge: I know you, dont I?
Defendant: Uh, yes.
Judge: All right, tell me, how do I know you?
Defendant: Judge, do I have to tell you?
Judge: Of course, you might be obstructing justice not to tell me.
Defendant: Okay. I was your bookie.
Lawyer: How do you feel about defense attorneys?
Juror: I think they should all be drowned at birth.
Lawyer: Well, then, you are obviously biased for the prosecution.
Juror: Thats not true. I think prosecutors should be drowned at birth too.
Lawyer questioning his client on the witness stand...
Plaintiffs Lawyer: What doctor treated you for the injuries you sustained while at work?
Plaintiff: Dr. J.
Plaintiffs
Lawyer: And what kind of physician is Dr. J?
Plaintiff: Well, Im not sure, but I remember that you said he was a good plaintiffs doctor.
Defendant: Judge, I want you to appoint me another lawyer.
Judge: And why is that?
Defendant: Because the Public Defender isnt interested in my case.
Judge (to Public Defender): Do you have any comments on the defendants motion?
Public Defender: Im sorry, Your Honor. I wasnt listening.
Judge: Please identify yourself for the record.
Defendant: Colonel Ebenezer Jackson.
Judge: What does the "Colonel" stand for?
Defendant: Well, its kinda like the "Honorable" in front of your name. Not a damn thing.
Defendant (after being sentenced to 90 days in jail): Can I address the court?
Judge: Of course.
Defendant: If I called you a son of a bitch, what would you do?
Judge: Id hold you in contempt and assess an additional five days in jail.
Defendant: What if I thought you were a son of a bitch?
Judge: I cant do anything about that. Theres no law against thinking.
Defendant: In that case, I think you're a son of a bitch.
$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.
I know, it's complex. (.pdf)
But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.
But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!
|
