 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
CONTACT EMAIL KILLERCOP @ KILLERCOP.COM |
|
||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
A considerable colloquy. JUDGE MATZ: "Now, I'm baffled here. We had considerable colloquy about getting the necessary ZIP-type equipment to Killercop! Because i am utterly astonished, baffled, and upset that despite my efforts and orders [to FPD appointed CJA Greg Nicolayson] that the material has not been transferred from one lawyer to the successive lawyer and is not in the current possession of the standby lawyer or the defendant." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, pretrial of killercop NOTE: What he was really upset about was he had to now cover up more of the mess he personally made. Maybe when Matz gets angry he gets possessed? It's very complex. Am I being pretty clear? It is a prudent thing to do! Probably? Or do I mean "most likely?" It is all so complex. LET US CONTINUE:
JURISDICTIONAL LEGAL MUMBO JUMBO!
Don't be bamboozled!
A JUDGE PLAYING BAFFLED AND DISTURBED. It is part of his coy and cagey game of disinformation. Nobody from Harvard can be that stupid. If so, that is a powerful stupid. I guess I spoke too soon.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
Judge Matz said he was "baffled and disturbed." Twice! But each time he said it with 2, far different outcomes.
Shoot, I reckon this isn’t the first time Harvard trained Judge A. Howard Matz has been astonished, baffled and disturbed (See left side of this page and below, example 2 of being baffled). One month after the September 11, 2001 attacks, DEA officials served search and arrest warrants on the Los Angeles Cannabis Resource Center and its directors Scott Imler, Jeff Yablan, and Jeff Farrington. The three plead guilty to charges in Federal Court, but US District Judge Howard A Matz would eventually sentence the defendants to no jail time and 1 year probation and a $100 fee, the absolute most lenient sentence allowable under the law. During sentencing Judge Matz called the prosecution "badly misguided" and said he was "baffled and disturbed" that the Department of Justice would use their [un]limited resources to prosecute the men. In an appeal which would follow along later, over half of the original jury which convicted the three, would turn up at the Appeals Court, to sit with the defendants in a show of solidarity. IN KILLERCOP'S CASE, MATZ DENIED ANY ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, SUBJECTED ME TO A CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT OF AN UNLAWFUL FORCED MENTAL "RESTORATION" TREATMENT, THEN FAILED HIS VITAL TASK OF PRODUCING THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW! SEEMS LIKE A NO BRAINER WHEN THE EXPERT IN THE LAW ASKS A DOCTOR FOR GUIDENCE ON A LEGAL QUESTION. GEE, WHAT COULD BE AND GO WRONG WITH THAT PLAN???????
TO TOP IT OFF HE THEN GIVE AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE AND REFUSED TO CORRECT IT. JUST ASK THE EXPERTS.
THEN, TO COVER IT UP TO KEEP IT SECRET HE WENT AND VIOLATED MORE RIGHTS.
NUTZ.
Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ EMAIL SALES @ KILLERCOP.COM (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
