The Sly Fox, The Silly Fool and The Accidental Facts.

As the First Circuit recognized of its own precedents, see Lewis, 554 F.3d at 213, we too have previously interpreted similarly-worded criminal statutes to require the actual crossing of state lines. In United States v. Korab, we addressed 18 U.S.C. § 875(b), in which someone is guilty of federal extortion if he "transmits in interstate commerce any communication containing any threat . . . to injure the person of another." 893 F.2d 212, 213 (9th Cir. 1989) (emphasis omitted) (ellipsis in original).

SAYING I AM GUILTY IS THE SAME AS YOU SAYING THE COPS ARE "HELPING" THIS AMERICAN CITIZEN, AND REPORTER, UP FROM THE GROUND.

FOR THE RECORD:

2011

"I DON'T ADMIT TRANSMITTING." " NEVER DID AND NEVER WILL."

I AFFIRM UNDER PAIN AND PENALTY OF PERJURY, OR EVEN TORTURE, THAT THE DOCUMENT ON THE UPPER-RIGHT OF THIS PAGE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT-COPY UP TO THE PART OF: "I DON'T ADMIT TRANSMITTING.

AND I CAN PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL, IF DEMANDED LEGALLY, LAWFULLY AND POLITELY. SO KEEP YOUR DOGS AT BAY! I AM ARMED, AGAIN.

BELIEVE IT!

YOU CAN CATCH A DEAD FISH WITH ANY JURISDICTIONAL HOOK.

A "jurisdictional hook" is a "'provision in a federal statute that requires the government to establish specific facts justifying the exercise of federal jurisdiction in connection with any individual application of the statute.'" United States v. McCoy, 323 F.3d 1114, 1124 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting United States v. Rodia, 194 F.3d 465, 471 (3d Cir. 1999)), overruled on other grounds by Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), as recognized in United States v. McCalla, 545 F.3d 750, 756 (9th Cir. 2008).

Similarly, in United States v. Killercop, we held that an identical jurisdictional hook in 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) was satisfied where the "[d]efendant electronically sent threats and social security numbers to internet servers located across state lines." 505 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir. 2007).

In that case, the government presented evidence that the defendant's website,
which contained the information, was uploaded to various servers located in multiple states. This was done through a false confession by his appeal attorney, Sung Park.

A.K.A. The Sucliffe Opinion Is Power!

 

"If you kill a man like me, you will injure yourselves more than you will injure me," because my role was that of a gadfly, "to sting people and whip them into a fury, all in the service of the truth."

Survive In Prison Or Jail - A How To Jail Guide Speeding Ticket Secrets! Insider Tips, Tricks And Strategies!

Surviving Martial Law!

How To Survive The Coming Food Crisis!

Crisis By Design!

What 300 Million Americans Need To Know!

Join The Movement To Impeach Barack Obama!

Easy Naturalization: Easy And Fast Way To Become A US Citizen!

How To Win Child Custody!

Divorce Strategies And Tactics!

Focused Interviewing System Of Interview And Interrogation!

Legal Forms, Contracts And Agreements!

Dealing With False Restraining Orders.

BELOW IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL WORDS OF THE EMAIL SENT TO SUNG PARK, ESQ, COUNSEL OF THE RECORD OF THE STATE.

Sent:                               Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:35 PM

To:                                   Sung B. Park

Subject:                          RE: IMPORTANT: jurisdiction

SHOW ME WHERE YOU BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT PROVED I TRANSMITTED ANY PAGE ESTABLISHED THROUGH A NETWORK LOG FILE.

IN ALL THE CASES CITED THE ACCUSED ADMITTED TRANSMITTING. THE GOVERNMENT WAS NEVER PUT TO THE CRUCIBLE OF PROVING IT.

I DON'T ADMIT TRANSMITTING.

 

[SINCERELY,

 

KILLERCOP]

Unreasonable opinion is formed by unspecific, unarticulable facts which, together with unobjective and unreasonable inferences, form the basis for suspecting that the particular person in question is engaged in a criminal activity.

RIGHT AFTER THE RIGGED HEARING, BY JUDGE MATZ' BUDDY, ALEX KOZINSKI, SUNG PARK ANNOUNCED HE "QUIT," IN THE PARKING LOT, DUMPED BOXES FROM HIS TRUNK AND ANOUNCED HE WAS GOING TO WORK FOR MR. BONNER AT HOMELAND SECURITY. AHHH JUDGE MATZ' OL' TAG TEAM WAS ALIVE AND STILL KICKING.

AND NOW I'VE "GOT TO TAKE HIM OUT."

ALL I HAVE LEFT IS RESTORATION, OR CONFRONTATION, AMERICA.

MY INTERPERTATION THIS TIME,

NOT THEIRS, OR YOURS. AND THIS SHINY CDROM, TOO! I DIN'T GET IT NOW, IN 2011, BUT BACK THEN.

See the Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article Four of the United States Constitution.

(“Interpretation of a word or phrase depends upon reading the whole statutory text, considering the purpose and context of the statute, and consulting any precedents or authorities that inform the analysis.”); Buckhannon Bd. and Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 615 (2001) (“Words that have acquired a specialized meaning in the legal context must be accorded their legal meaning.”). Absent a more specific statutory definition, “[j]udicial jurisdiction implies the power to hear and determine a cause . . . .” United States v. O’Grady, 89 U.S. 641, 647 (1874).

 

THE RESULTS ARE IN!!

 

A FRAUD AND TREASON UPON THE COURT, BY AN ASSUMPTION OF THE JURISDICTION, THROUGH AN INFERENCE. ALL FOR THE POWER TO SHUT THE INTERNET DOWN!!

 

 

LIKE A GOD AMONGST MERE MORTALS!

 

 

"He's just a victim," said Roslawati, 30, as tears streamed from both eyes. "He didn't post that video ..." Like many Indonesians, she uses just one name.

 

 

Well, Roslawati, perhaps you should stop by my little shop of horrors, maybe grab an ID or two, jump on a boat and head forward until you see the statute above. Unless you want to go to my rewards page. The cash rewards page. You know, the one with no questions asked? Or so the story goes...

 

But beeeeeeeee sure to arm yourself. There are Goblins about. And a really bad Korean liar. And the other guy with an accent is pretty crooked, too. That much I am pretty sure.