As the First Circuit recognized of its own precedents, see Lewis, 554 F.3d at 213, we too have previously interpreted similarly-worded criminal statutes to
require the actual crossing of state lines. In United States v. Korab, we addressed 18 U.S.C. § 875(b), in which someone is guilty of federal extortion if he " transmits in interstate commerce any communication containing any threat . . . to injure the person of another." 893 F.2d 212, 213 (9th Cir. 1989) ( emphasis omitted) (ellipsis in original).
Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.
SAYING I AM GUILTY IS THE SAME AS YOU SAYING THE COPS ARE "HELPING" THIS AMERICAN CITIZEN, AND REPORTER, UP FROM THE GROUND.
FOR THE RECORD:
2011 "I DON'T
NEVER DID AND NEVER WILL."
I AFFIRM UNDER PAIN AND PENALTY OF PERJURY, OR EVEN
TORTURE, THAT THE DOCUMENT ON THE UPPER-RIGHT OF THIS PAGE IS A TRUE AND CORRECT-COPY UP TO THE PART OF: " I DON'T
AND I CAN PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL, IF DEMANDED LEGALLY, LAWFULLY AND POLITELY. SO KEEP YOUR DOGS AT BAY! I AM ARMED, AGAIN.
YOU CAN CATCH A DEAD FISH WITH ANY JURISDICTIONAL HOOK.
"jurisdictional hook" is a "'provision in a federal statute that requires the government to establish specific facts justifying the exercise of federal
jurisdiction in connection with individual application of the statute.'" United States v. McCoy, 323 F.3d 1114, 1124 (9th Cir. 2003) (quoting
United States v. Rodia, 194 F.3d 465, 471 (3d Cir. 1999)), overruled on
other grounds by Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), as recognized in
United States v. McCalla, 545 F.3d 750, 756 (9th Cir. 2008). any
Similarly, in United States v. Killercop, we held that an identical
jurisdictional hook in 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) was satisfied where the "[d]efendant electronically sent threats and social
security numbers to internet servers located across state
lines." 505 F.3d 944, 953 (9th Cir. 2007).
In that case, the
government presented evidence that the defendant's website,
which contained the information, was uploaded to various servers
located in multiple states. This was done through a false confession by his appeal attorney, Sung Park.
A.K.A. The Sucliffe Opinion Is Power!
" If you kill a man like me, " you will " because injure yourselves more than you will injure me, my role was that of a gadfly, " to sting people and whip them into a fury, all in the service of the truth .
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
what would be the capacity of law enforcement
and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" - Judge A. Howard Matz , PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like " pretty clear?" Because I'm " pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.
I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...
you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!
"another person" and "the person of another.
Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!
In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!
BELOW IS A COPY OF THE ACTUAL WORDS OF THE EMAIL SENT TO SUNG PARK,
ESQ, COUNSEL OF THE RECORD OF THE STATE.
Sent : Tuesday, November 21, 2006 2:35 PM
To: Sung B. Park
Subject: RE: IMPORTANT: jurisdiction
SHOW ME WHERE YOU
BELIEVE THE GOVERNMENT PROVED I TRANSMITTED ANY PAGE ESTABLISHED THROUGH A
NETWORK LOG FILE.
IN ALL THE CASES
CITED THE ACCUSED ADMITTED TRANSMITTING. THE GOVERNMENT WAS NEVER PUT TO
THE CRUCIBLE OF PROVING IT.
I DON'T ADMIT TRANSMITTING.
Unreasonable opinion is formed by unspecific, unarticulable facts which, together with form the basis for suspecting that the particular person in question is unobjective and unreasonable inferences, engaged in a criminal activity.
RIGHT AFTER THE RIGGED HEARING, BY JUDGE MATZ' BUDDY, ALEX KOZINSKI, SUNG PARK ANNOUNCED HE "QUIT," IN THE PARKING LOT, DUMPED BOXES FROM HIS TRUNK AND ANOUNCED HE WAS GOING TO WORK FOR MR. BONNER AT HOMELAND SECURITY. AHHH JUDGE MATZ' OL' TAG TEAM WAS ALIVE AND STILL KICKING.
AND NOW I'VE
"GOT TO TAKE HIM OUT."
ALL I HAVE LEFT IS RESTORATION, OR CONFRONTATION, AMERICA.
MY INTERPERTATION THIS TIME,
NOT THEIRS, OR YOURS.
AND THIS SHINY CDROM, TOO! I DIN'T GET IT NOW, IN 2011, BUT BACK THEN.
Privileges Clause of Immunities and Article Four of the United States Constitution.
Interpretation of a word or phrase depends
upon reading the whole statutory text, considering the purpose
and context of the statute, and consulting any precedents or
authorities that inform the analysis.”); Buckhannon Bd. and
Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dep’t of Health and Human
Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 615 (2001) (“ Words that have
acquired a specialized meaning in the legal context must be accorded their legal meaning.”). Absent a more specific statutory
definition, “ [j]udicial jurisdiction implies the power to
hear and determine a cause . . . .” United States v. O’Grady,
89 U.S. 641, 647 (1874).
THE RESULTS ARE IN!!
A FRAUD AND TREASON UPON THE COURT, BY AN ASSUMPTION OF THE JURISDICTION, THROUGH AN INFERENCE. ALL FOR THE POWER TO SHUT THE INTERNET DOWN!!
LIKE A GOD AMONGST MERE MORTALS!
"He's just a victim," said Roslawati, 30, as tears streamed from both eyes. " He didn't post that video ..." Like many Indonesians, she uses just one name.
Roslawati, perhaps you should stop by my little shop of horrors, maybe grab an ID or two, jump on a boat and head forward until you see the statute above. Unless you want to go to my rewards page. The cash rewards page. You know, the one with no questions asked? Or so the story goes...
But beeeeeeeee sure to arm yourself. There are Goblins about. And a really bad Korean liar. And the other guy with an accent is pretty crooked, too. That much I am pretty sure.
Contempt Of Cop
Washingtonpost.com - ' Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...
Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...
Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...
Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...
Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II
CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about ' contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.
Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.
Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.
How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.
My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.
EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!