Only the most complex cases!

 

"I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Killercop, that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all." ~Judge Howard Matz

 

 

WELL THEN HOWARD, LETS LOOK IN THE BOOK YOU WROTE ON THE PROCEDURES.

 

"But, we do not count continuances granted by the district court where it made no specific findings supporting a general mantra[s] of 'complexity'." (US v. Aviles, 170 F.3d 863, 869 (9th Cir.1998)). Thus, there is a clear distinction between a 'complex' case as defined by the law."

A "Complex" computer case???

Naaaaaaaa!!

 

"This is a computer case where counsel for Killercop is like a child learning the scales and Killercop is playing Beethoven piano sonatas. It's like if he spoke -- if it was in Chinese and he spoke Chinese and I didn't." ~William Harris, FPD. (Assigned by Judge Matz to handle this "complex computer case brought by Debra Wong Yang.")

 

"I think you could have somebody who has never seen a computer but is a fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That's my view." ~Judge Howard Matz, in reply to William Harris above.

THE LAW SAYS:

THEY MUST FIRST FILE THIS.

 

BUT WHO IS FOLLOWING LAW IN THIS CASE?

 

 

CERTAINLY NOT JUDGE MATZ, AND CERTAINLY NOT THE U.S. GOVERNMENT!

 

 

HERE COME THE EXPERTS...

IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE??

OR DO THEY COME WITH SUBPOENAS?

AND BIG MACS?

 

MATZ IS STILL MAKING COMPLEX ERRORS!

 

AND MORE ILLEGAL SENTENCES.

 

THIS PAGE SPONSORED BY FARETTA!