You have one choice. Meaning, there are two things from which you can choose.

Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz





Judge Howard Matz: “You have one choice. Meaning, there are two things from which you can choose. It’s either Mr. Harris or yourself.” “[An] attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client.” A Citizen who let's another "re-present" him, instead of "assist" him is a bigger fool." [The Computer Expert, Not!] SAY WHAT? 11.21.2002 William Harris: Public Defenders Office, Los Angeles, California, Central District. "This is a computer case where counsel for Killercop is like a child learning the scales and Killercop is playing Beethoven piano sonatas. It's like if he spoke -- if it was in Chinese and he spoke Chinese and I didn't. "In a [complex] computer case where you’ve got all sorts of computer evidence coupled with the problem that the client has technical expertise that the lawyer doesn't, it just compounds the issue." ~WILLIAM HARRIS "I don't mean to minimize what I think you're telling me because *I'm in the same boat as you, but I construed you to tell me that you need some kind of tutelage about the niceties of computer technology and Internet usage..." ~JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, in reply to WILLIAM "WILD BILL" HARRIS, of the Los Angeles, California, Public Defenders Office. ANYONE SEEN MY NICETIES? I HAD THEM BEFORE I ENTERED THIS MAD COURT. MAYBE THE GOBLIN ATE THEM, ALONG WITH THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW? THIS IS ALL TOO COMPLEX FOR ME. TOOTALOO!! I MEAN, TUTELAGE!! LIKE THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND!! Bifurcation The presentation of only two alternatives where others exist is called the fallacy of bifurcation. Sometimes known as the 'black and white' fallacy, it presents an 'either/or' situation when in reality there is a range of options. A.K.A. Forced to sacrifice one constitutionally protected right, solely because another is respected. Page 5, Lines 1-2 Judge Howard Matz: “You have one choice. Meaning, there are two things from which you can choose. It’s either Mr. Harris or yourself.” Killercop: “I will stand on my paperwork.” “[An] attorney who represents himself has* a fool for a client.” Judge Matz thinks you should represent yourself. What do you think about that? Debra Wong Yang says, even if present counsel is competent, a serious breakdown in communications can result in an inadequate defense. United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1102 (9th Cir. 2000). But me no care!!! Similarly, even if a defendant is denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he is "forced into a trial with the assistance of a particular lawyer with whom he [is] dissatisfied, with whom he[will] not cooperate, and with whom he [will] not, in any manner whatsoever, communicate." Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970). Me still no care! a. Factors to be considered in ruling upon a motion for appointment of new counsel. In reviewing a district court's denial of a motion for appointment of new counsel, the appellate court considers: (1) the timeliness of the motion, (2) the adequacy of the court's inquiry into defendant's complaint, and (3) the extent of the conflict. United States v. George, 85 F.3d 1433, 1438 (9th Cir. 1996) (citation omitted). BENCHBOOK ON CRIMINAL PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS. The only "inquiry," other then above, came in the form of a secret one. A most unlawful one. A Star Chamber. See Judge Howard Matz sees the law as his own personal tool. He doesn't "protect the rights," under the Constitution, he believes he owns them, he bestows them, like gifts, to whom only he chooses. Like a god. QUOTES OF JUDGE MATZ: "In fact, you'll be given the right." Given? The right I, and millions of other Americans, already own by birthright? Your oath is not to give, but to protect those rights. Without appearence of bias or bafflement. Sounds like you are describing an entitlement. And a dictatorship. That allows for selective application of the rights. And selective prosecutions. Both are unlawful. And dishonorable. Remember how you forced and imposed, Greg Nicolaysen, ohhh the "agony" he shall soon suffer! RELATED STORY JUST IN: QUOTE OF JUDGE MATZ: 09.26.2003 "SUTCLIFFE'S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL" ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz, from 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24 As you just witnessed, color of law also allows for some very, very creative excuses. Some stupid. But, stupid is as stupid does. That's called conduct and intent. I suggest you promply read the law, Sir. Before everyone in the secret rooms across America die. I too am no mere mortal. Judge Matz says in federal criminal cases, Rule 51(b) instructs parties how to preserve claims of error: “by informing the court—when [a] ruling … is made or sought—of the action the party wishes the court to take, or the party’s objection to the court’s action and the grounds for that objection.” A party’s failure to preserve a claim ordinarily prevents him from raising it on appeal, but Rule 52(b) recognizes a limited exception for plain errors. “Plain-error review” involves four prongs: (1) there must be an error or defect that the appellant has not affirmatively waived United States v. Olano, 507 U. S. 725 ; (2) it must be clear or obvious, see id., at 734; (3) it must have affected the appellant’s substantial rights, i.e., “affected the outcome of the district court proceedings,” ibid.; and (4) if the three other prongs are satisfied, the court of appeals has the discretion to remedy the error if it “ ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings,’ ” id., at 736. $PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$ OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA "what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM A QUESTION FOR AMERICA: Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled. I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then... Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "another person" and "the person of another. STILL BAFFFLED? Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it! In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children! THE END.		THE KILLERCOP.COM STOLEN FILES. A.K.A. The inadequacy of the court's inquiry. BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME TWICE. BIG BROTHER WAS WATCHING, BUT NOT HARD ENOUGH!! WHILE KILLERCOP WAS IMPRISONED, THESE FILES WERE LOST BY THE PUBLIC PRETENDER AFTER SOMEONE STOLE THEM ENROUTE, WITHIN THE B.O.P THEN THE LOCAL ATTORNEY NAMED A. RODELL, WITHIN THE B.O.P, TRIED TO GET ME TO BREAK THE LAW BY ANTE-DATING A DOCUMENT. (.pdf) SERIOUSLY. AND DON'T FORGET MY ZIPS!! OR THE HARD-DRIVES. JUDGE HOWARD MATZ WILL GET BAFFLED AND DISTURBED AGAIN!! SEE: A.K.A. THE COMPUTER EXPERT. A.K.A. THE MISSING MAC SEE ALSO THE WORTHLESS FILE SEE ALSO THE MISSING EXPERTS SEE ALSO THE MISSING DOCTOR SEE ALSO THE MISSING ACCUSED SEE ALSO THE MISSING CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW. SEE ALSO THE MISSING SIXTH AMENDMENT. DO SO PROMPTLY. WATCH AN ACT OF "AGONY," OVER, AND AFTER, THE FACT. BUT THEY STILL IGNORED IT, THEN BROKE THE LAW, AND VIOLATED DUE PROCESS, WILLFULLY AND WITH SPECIFIC INTENT. YOU LIKE AGONY???? YOU GONNA GET IT THEN, U.S., WHEN YOU LEAST EXPECT IT! HIS DAYS OF ILLEGAL SENTENCES FOR THE COPORATE BIG WIGS WHO OWN THE COPORATE PRISONS, FOR THEIR CUBICLE COWS, IS OVER. Procedural Unconscionability A determination of whether a contract is procedurally unconscionable focuses on two factors: oppression and surprise. "`Oppression' arises from an inequality of bargaining power which results in no real negotiation and an absence of meaningful choice. `Surprise' involves the extent to which the supposedly agreed-upon terms of the bargain are hidden in the prolix printed form drafted by the party seeking to enforce the disputed terms." Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc., 51 Cal.App.4th 1519, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 138, 145 (Ct.App.1997). "AT THIS POINT YOU HAVE ONE CHOICE, MEANING THERE ARE TWO THINGS YOU CAN CHOOSE, IT'S EITHER YOU TAKE MATZ OUT, OR I DO." 10.21.2003 Page 22, Lines 3-6 Judge Matz: “I have read carefully every response that has gotten to "us" and I’m satisfied and I’m making a finding that all of your contentions about lost, destroyed, unaccounted-for evidence are unfounded.” Saavedra: “Excuse me, Your Honor, he is correct. They did send him a 100-Megabyte ZIP. Now, stating that his are 250, he is correct. He won’t read it." Judge Matz: “How long have you known that the Zip disk has not been usable by Killercop?” Saavedra: “When he told me that a couple of weeks ago. He didn't even have a ZIP disk. And of the evidence that I was sent in to MDC, there was not one ZIP disk anywhere.” Killercop: “That’s correct.” A.K.A. ANOTHER SAD STORY OF A PERVERTED COVER-UP AND OBSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE. A PRETTY GOOD SYSTEM!! THE COURT: Let the record reflect that there is nothing on this document that contains any Internet Protocol -- IP -- address information. It does show that there was a contact with Network Solutions. If you want to find out whether they got the precise IP address that you gave on the record a few questions ago, you may need to show him another document. KILLERCOP: Your Honor -- THE COURT: Please move on!! KILLERCOP: Respectfully, Your Honor, and I mean very respectfully, I would point the Court's attention to No. 7 on this document and No. 8 that we are looking at and direct the Court's attention to 24.160.57.210. THE COURT: "I am incorrect. You are correct." But you will pay for that. Never speak truth to power!! IF YOU DO YOU'LL BE SHOCKED BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME AGAIN! The drunk is crawling around on all fours under a lamppost one night. A policeman comes along and asks him his business and the drunk decides to explain that he's looking for a lost quarter. The policeman offers to help and pretty soon they're both crawling around looking for the coin. After about a half hour of this, the policeman gets fed up and asks, "Are you sure you lost the quarter around here?" "Oh, no," answers the drunk. "I dropped it over in the alley, but it's too dark to look there" This page is dedicated to my late Dad, Arnold Sutcliffe. Retired, U.S. Air Force, who passed away in 2009. Dad taught me to answer to only one authority, save God and Counrty, and that is the small, still voice inside my heart. Not the loud one outside my home. Contempt Of Cop Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies... Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years... Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off... Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical... Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law. Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions. Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet. How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high. My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis. EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!! COWARDS!
		The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz. By Psych Ward Entertainment. Sign my Guestbook Contact \| Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved. Impressum