Cum hoc ergo propter hoc
The results, presented 04.04.2011 at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society, serve as a reminder that hypothetical scenarios don’t capture the complexities of real decisions.
A.K.A. WOULD RATHER I KICK YOU IN THE TEETH, OR IN THE HEAD?
JUDGE MATZ: "
Okay. , because I'm going to prevent the witness
from answering the question this is my standard
practice. Ladies and gentlemen [of the jury], "we" all know that "anything is
that lacks a
foundation, The question calls for speculation, is an impermissible question . ~Judge Howard Matz, trial of Killercop
MIND MADE UP.
I AM JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER.
But either way, you're going to trial, unless you decided that there's an alternative thing you want to do , and I'm hoping you won't, which is " ~Judge Howard Matz, Pretrial of Killercop. plead guilty. 01.14.2003
A.K.A. DOUBLE SPEAK, A.K.A. THE CASE OF A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE IS A WONDERFUL THING!!
MATZ KNEW I WAS NOT GUILTY! SO DID WANG'S ASS', ELENA. I MEAN, MOST LIKELY.
defendant is denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he is " forced into a trial with the assistance of a particular lawyer with whom he [is] dissatisfied, with whom he[will] not cooperate, and with whom he [will] not, in any manner whatsoever, communicate." Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970).
I.T. IS COMPLEX
"UNUSUAL," TOO. NOT!!
"[And] in the year 2010 we're still trying to figure out if you've got a lawyer that's going to be okay for you the way you see it. That's not going to happen because at some point I have the power and "the obligation" to find that you have waived your right to have a lawyer re-present you. And then you're going to trial on your own. BUT EITHER WAY, ~Judge A Howard Matz, 01.14.2003 you're going to trial!" Pretrial of Killercop.
"ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN" BECAUSE, HE MEANS ATTORNEYS ARE TOO AFRAID, OR CORRUPTED, OF HIS GOOD BUDDY IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT, AND HIS OTHER POLITICAL FRIENDS WILL PROTECT HIM FROM ANY JUSTICE. AS ALWAYS, HE IS WRONG.
THE POWER OF A SUGGESTION CAN CHANGE THE COURSE OF OUR HISTORY.
The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they try to " alter the facts to fit their views.
Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.
You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
Seriously, do you really believe anyone
"has to" look and listen? Or even look? No turning away? In my country that is called captives, prisoners or slaves. Well, I suppose that is good for the economy. But not very prudent.
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
what would be the capacity of law enforcement
and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" - Judge A. Howard Matz , PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like " pretty clear?" Because I'm " pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.
I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...
you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!
"another person" and "the person of another.
Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!
In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!
after " discusssion of a " His" " on Guilty plea 01.14.2003.
" OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THE REASON I'M ASKING YOU THESE QUESTIONS IS, IS THAT IF I -- IF I WERE TO TELL YOU -- AND, AGAIN, THIS IS -- I GUESS HAS TO BE --BUT THE A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION BREAKDOWN OF COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN KILLERCOP AND HIS PRIOR THREE ATTORNEYS, AS WELL AS MR. NICOLAYSEN -- AND BY, BREAKDOWN, I DESCRIBE WHAT YOU SAW THIS MORNING."
" FOLLOWED DIRECTLY DISCUSSIONS OF PLEADING GUILTY, AND WHAT KILLERCOP WOULD HAVE TO DO AND HAVE TO ADMIT TO IN ORDER TO RESOLVE THE CASE, THAT, IS IT POSSIBLE PERHAPS, KILLERCOP SIMPLY GETS VERY, VERY ANGRY TO THE POINT WHERE HE REFUSES TO CONTROL HIMSELF, AND INSTEAD, EXPRESSES HIS ANGER WHEN HE'S CONFRONTED WITH THE FACT THAT IT'S MAYBE TIME TO EITHER SETTLE THE CASE OR GET READY FOR TRIAL?"
MR. NICOLAYSEN: " YOUR ODOR, PERMIT ME. I DON'T MEAN TO OBJECT IN THIS TYPE OF PROCEEDING, I AM BUT YOUR HUMBLE SLAVE AND CAPTIVE, BUT I DON'T WANT THE RECORD TO SUGGEST THAT THE ASSUMPTION IS, IN FACT, CORRECT." THAT'S A LOT OF UNLAWFUL FACT FINDING...
THE COURT: "
YES. I DON'T THINK THE RECORD DOES SUGGEST THAT. I DON'T CONSTRUE IT TO BE ANYTHING OTHER THAN A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION. I DON'T HAVE ANY ASSUMPTION, AND I'M CERTAINLY NOT MAKING ANY FINDINGS."
"BUT I THINK THE WAY TO REALLY
GET THE QUESTION FRAMED IN A WAY THAT I THINK WOULD ASSIST ME, IS TO ASK IT THIS WAY, DOCTOR, HYPOTHETICALLY SPEEKING, TO THE EXTENT THAT IT'S AN INHERENT FUNCTION OF A
CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY IN RE-PRESENTING EFFECTIVELY THE BEST INTEREST OF HIS CLIENT, TO EXPLORE WITH THE PROSECUTOR, A THAT MIGHT LIMIT SOME " REASONABLE PLEA AGREEMENT DOWNSIDE RISKS" TO THE DEFENDANT; AND, TWO, SECONDLY, TO THE EXTENT THAT THAT ATTORNEY THEN HAS AN "OBLIGATION" TO DISCUSS WITH THE DEFENDANT,
THE DISCUSSIONS THE ATTORNEY MAY HAVE HAD WITH THE PROSECUTOR; DO YOU THINK THAT THE COMBINATION OF THOSE TWO THINGS WOULD
MAKE IT DIFFICULT FOR KILLERCOP TO WORK WITH HIS ATTORNEY, WHOEVER THAT ATTORNEY IS?
THE WITNESS: I THINK BASED ON WHAT I SAW TODAY, YES.
hypothetically speaking IF YOU SAW THIS WOULD IT CHANGE YOUR MIND?
THE WITNESS: BASED ON THAT?
Hypothetically speaking SURE!!
A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION FOR RANDY, KEITH OR KATHY.
WOULD IT BE BETTER TO SHOOT JUDGE MATZ, FROM TEN YARDS AWAY, IN THE HEAD OR IN THE FOOT HE LOVES TO PUT INTO HIS MOUTH?
I WASN''T SURE, SO I BROUGHT
DYNAMITE, JUST IN CASE!
MORE OF THE CORRUPT
"HAVE TO" EXCUSES INSTEAD OF FACTS. THIS TIME IT IS THE WIZARD OF KOZ AND "INFER." THAT MEANS TO GUESS.
OR JUST TAKE A STAB OR A SHOT IN THE DARK!
WHO NEEDS FACTS?? WHO NEEDS FREEDOM OF CHOICE??
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY!!
IT IS MUCH MORE FUN TO TORTURE PEOPLE IN SECRET AND INFER THINGS NEVER HAPPENED. IN THIS PROCESS, ANYTHING CAN AND DOES HAPPEN. AND THEN SOME.
THIS PROCESS I AM GOD. YOU ARE BUT A CAPTIVE OF MY IMAGINATION.
ONE WHO "HAS TO" LOOK AND LISTEN.
OKAY, THEN WATCH
THESE CAPTIVES CRY OUT FROM THE NIGHTMARE YOU STARTED. OR YOU CAN BUY THIS AND STIMULATE THE ECONOMY. YOU AND THE REST OF THE GANG. OR WATCH THIS VIDEO TO SEE A SMALL TASTE OF THE FRAUD ON THE COURT.
Contempt Of Cop
Washingtonpost.com - ' Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...
Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...
Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...
Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...
Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs Contempt Of Cop II
CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about ' contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.
Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.
Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.
How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.
My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.
EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!