The Case Of "Killercop Held A Gun To Their Head..., They Had To Look And Listen. It's their nature as a slave.

 

Just Ask their Doctor in charge of the Mental Abuse "Treatment!" Don't Do it over lunch, though, because he enjoys a Brain Salad Surgery.

 

 

I’ve never been wrong
But you' re the only one I trust to show me the way
I always hear your voice
And in my dreams I hear you calling my name...
What is it about you?
Some kind of light shines from your face
And I can’t turn away
I'm like a prisoner captured by your eyes
I’ve been taken and I’ve been hypnotized
I'm like a prisoner captured by your eyes
I’ve been taken and I’ve been hypnotized
And your eyes say everything
You want to keep me here forever
I can’t escape
One minute so sincere
Then you completely turn against me and I’m afraid
You don’t have to say you love me
’cause if you want me, I'll stay
’cause I can't turn away
I'm like a prisoner captured by your eyes
I’ve been taken, taken by surprise
I'm like a prisoner captured by your eyes
I've been taken and I’ve been hypnotized
I'm like a prisoner...

 

 

"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common APART FROM A LACK OF COMMON SENSE.

 

Instead of altering their views and Opinions to fit the facts, they try to alter the facts to fit their views."

 

 

THE EVIL GOBLINS OF THE WORLD USE "SUGGESTIONS." OR DISINFORMATION. THEY ONLY FOOL THEMSELVES.

LIKE A COURT JESTER.

THIS SPEECH HERE WAS THE SUGGESTION AND EXCUSE USED BY ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY, ELENA DUARTE, SPEAKING NO DOUBT FOR HER BOSS, DEBRA WONG YANG, TO EXPLAIN HOW MUCH OF A DANGER I AM TO "THE PEOPLE WHO "HAVE TO" LOOK AND LISTEN."

WELL THEN HOW COME I CAN'T LOOK AND LISTEN? WHY DID THEY GET TO LOOK AND LISTEN, AND I CAN'T?

 

JUST WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE, WHO "HAVE TO" LOOK AND "HAVE TO" LISTEN, AND I CAN'T?

 

"And we have very real fear here on the part of the people, who HAVE TO look at themselves and their houses, [and Kilercop's threat,] and listen to sound wave files." ~ELENA DUARTE, ASSISTANT TO DEBRA YANG, U.S., ATTORNEY GENERAL, BAIL DETENTION HEARING, BEFORE JUDGE HOWARD MATZ.

 

YOU COULD SAY I AM DYING TO MEET THEM, OR YOU COULD SAY THAT THEY WILL JUST DIE WHEN THEY MEET ME!!

IF THEY WERE REALLY MY CAPTIVES, I PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE JUST KILLED THEM, THEN ELENA DUARTE WOULD HAVE HAD NO REASON TO BE SUCH A BITCH, AND LIE TO THE PEOPLE, AND MISAPPLY THE LAWS, TORTURE ME, MORE THEN ONCE, WHILE THEY LOOK AT THEMSELVES AND THEIR HOUSES.

I CAN JUST CLAIM I "HAD TO."

OR I "NEED TO?"

OR CAN I JUST SAY IT WAS A MISTAKE?

 

OR THAT I AGONIZED OVER IT?

FEELING HARRASED? HAVING A NIGHTMARE? GIT OVER IT! NOBODY IS A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE HERE, EXCEPT ME. AND YOU ARE FREE TO LEAVE, ANYTIME! UNLIKE I WAS, FOR MANY, MANY ILLEGAL AND UNLAWFUL YEARS.

Not long after, he surrendered to authorities and confessed to being the leaker. Ellsberg was charged as a spy. His trial, on twelve felony counts posing a possible sentence of 115 years, was dismissed on grounds of governmental misconduct against him. In April 1973, the court learned that Nixon had ordered his so-called "Plumbers Unit" to break into the office of Ellsberg's psychiatrist to steal documents they hoped might make the whistle-blower appear crazy.

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!

THE END.

 

A.K.A. The Case Of A "Captive" Audience is a wonderful thing!! A.K.A. The Case of Not "Another Person," but The Person Of Another.A.K.A. I am going to take you out. A.K.A. Bad Date Night!!

A trial court's participation in the proceedings warrants reversal "if the record ... leaves the reviewing court with an abiding impression that the judge's remarks and questioning of witnesses projected to the jury an appearance of advocacy or partiality." United States v. Mostella, 802
F.2d 358, 361 (9th Cir. 1986)

Captive audience— The [state] government has the ability to limit speech that would otherwise be protected if that speech is being imposed on a captive audience, which occurs when it would be impractical for the listener to be able to escape that speech." This is often used in cases of minors and infants and F.B.I. accountant agents See cases.

See Children. See also the word No.

Captive Adult Audiences See:

	Breard v. City of Alexandria (1951)
	Cohen v. California (1971)
	Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission (1980)
	Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville (1975)
	Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica (1978)
	Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District (1979)
	Hess v. Indiana (1973)
	Kunz v. New York (1951)
	Lehman v. City of Shaker Heights (1974)
	Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn. (1978)
	Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak (1952)
	Rowan v. United States Post Office (1970)

 

 

Since you are now an admitted Captive of mine, I am going to play a game with you called, "I am going to take you out."

 

 

In this game I can do anything I want to you, short of death, just 'cause you are now my captive. In other words you have "no" jurisdiction. So you can't ever challenge me. Just 'cause I say so!

No other authority is needed. Woot!

 

But don't forget, I reserved the right to kill you when the game began. So don't worry about when it will happen, or where. Just be sure it will be soon, and sudden. But the way I am going to kill you shall be slow, and painful. And I shall torture you first. Trust me when I say I will laugh while I do it.

 

You will probably beg for me to finish the wasted, pathetic, little life God gave you.

 

Afterwards, if I survive another false arrest by these cops and U.S. Attorneys, or Marshals, I shall claim incompetence, and Goblins. Mostly accrued from your turn at the game of, "I am going to take you out."

 

Chuckie will be coming to the game, too!

He is in charge! Watch out. Be sure to look under your bed, in the closets, and the dark shadows!! Time to get your game face on!!

 

"Finally, in arguments before this Court much has been made of the claim that Cohen's distasteful mode of expression was thrust upon unwilling or unsuspecting viewers, and that the State might therefore legitimately act as it did in order to protect the sensitive from otherwise unavoidable exposure to appellant's crude form of protest.

 

Of course, the mere presumed presence of unwitting listeners or viewers does not serve automatically to justify curtailing all speech capable of giving offense. See, e. g., Organization for a Better Austin v. Keefe, 402 U.S. 415 (1971). While this Court has recognized that [state] government may properly act in many situations to prohibit intrusion into the privacy of the home of unwelcome views and ideas which cannot be totally banned from the public dialogue, e. g., Rowan v. Post Office Dept., 397 U.S. 728 (1970), we have at the same time consistently stressed that "we are often `captives' outside the sanctuary of the home and subject to objectionable speech." Id., at 738. The ability of state government, consonant with the Constitution, to shut off discourse solely to protect others from hearing it is, in other words, dependent upon a showing that substantial privacy interests are being invaded in an essentially intolerable manner. Any broader view of this authority would effectively empower a majority to silence dissidents simply as a matter of personal predilections." The ability of Federal government, consonant with the Constitution, to take down speech and discourse is none.

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!

COWARDS!

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Sign my Guestbook

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum