Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre.

 

 

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

In a federal court, in a case in front of a federal judge they lied and committed perjury.

The questions I raise are very simple: should an F.B.I. agent of the United States be above the law? Should the judge and prosecutor be above the law?" If so, what are the consequences of that injustice other than Constitutional Chaos?

What's the frequency, Kenneth?

Hey Ken, I noticed your frequent use of the word "posted". The correct word is "Transmits."

DUNCE

DIDN'T THEY TEACH YOU THAT:

 

”Using another's signature constitutes the use of that person's name and thus qualifies as a “means of identification” under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A.” Id.

 

Oh No! I heard you telling a lie to a federal judge.

FEELING UNEASY?

 

JUST A LITTLE?

GOOGLE DOESN'T LIE, LIKE YOU DID... CHECK IT OUT.

REMEMBER THE RULE OF LAW:

 

"Nobody in this country is above the law, an FBI agent or otherwise.

 

[EXCEPT THE BANKERS AND THEIR CORPORATE POLICE FORCE]..."~John Durham

 

Ken, FYI: My signature on yer PPT file is a crime under 18 U.S.C. § 1028A. And speaking of 1028A.

HERE IS AN UPDATE FOR YOU AND THE GANG.

This definition includes the use of my name, alone or in conjunction with any other information, as constituting the use of a means of identification so long as the information taken as a whole identifies a specific individual. There is nothing in the language of the statute that suggests the use of another's name in the form of a signature is somehow excluded from the definition of "means of identification."

Were we to find that signatures are categorically not names and thus not included within this definition, we would be disregarding the "settled principle of statutory construction that we must give effect, if possible, to every word of the statute." Bowsher v. Merck & Co., Inc., 460 U.S. 824, 833, 103 S.Ct. 1587, 75 L.Ed.2d 580 (1983) (citation omitted). By using the word "any" to qualify the term "name," the statute reflects Congress's intention to construct an expansive definition. See Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 831, 835-36, 169 L.Ed.2d 680 (2008) ("Read naturally, the word `any' has an expansive meaning, that is, `one or some indiscriminately of whatever kind.' ") (citation and alteration omitted). Categorically carving out a signature from this definition, although a signature is commonly understood to be the written form of a person's name[1], would impermissibly narrow the definition of "name" in the statute. Thus, we agree with the district court that a signature is a name for the purpose of applying the Aggravated Identity Theft statute.

You're corrupted. And probably a racist.

And ya got to quit making Power Point Presentations because you can't draw for shit.

KEN, ARREST YOURSELF!

Global Crossing Employee; Sovereign Citizen Adherent; www.killercop.com; Web Terror Campaign; Posted all employee SSN's; Home addresses, telephone numbers

BETTER YET, ARREST SPECIAL JEFF FOR THE MISTAKE, THEN YOURSELF! AND GRAB MATZ, AND HIS GANG, ON YOUR WAY TO THE BIG HOUSE.


 

BEAN LADEN

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

The Trial of Judge A.Howard Matz

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

TORTURED COVER UP

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

CROOKED COPS ON THE RUN

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!

THE END.

A QUOTE:

Kenneth G. McGuire

"Global Crossing Employee; Sovereign Citizen Adherent, www.killercop.com; Web Terror Campaign; Posted all employee SSN's; home addresses, telephone numbers..."

By Kenneth G. McGuire

Supervisory Special Agent, Cyber Crime Squad, F.B.I.- Los Angeles Field Office, Central District of California.

 

GOBLINS OF HITLER

KEN, YOU FORGOT TO MENTION I AM A LAWYER, TOO. BUT NOT BY FREE CHOICE.

AND WHO IS YOUR SUPERVISOR?


THOUGHT CRIME

Kenneth G. McGuire, Supervisory Special Agent, Cyber Crime Squad, FBI- Los Angeles Field Office Special Ken, above, specializes in making pretty Power Point Presentations about this web site, as seen here.

Kenneth G. McGuire, Supervisory Special Agent, Cyber Crime Squad, FBI- Los Angeles Field Office


Intent

Special Ken also claims " no F.B.I. investigations were ever related to this web site."

Ever.

Seriously?

That's the "special" story you are sticking with, Ken? Okay, now I am the one with a "special concern." And when I say now, I mean in the present-tense.

report4

How come you name killercop.com in your Power Point Presentation, Ken? How come after Killercop's arrest by the F.B.I., in 2001, y'all told the press that "killercop allegedly 'posted' Social Security numbers, dates of birth and home addresses, on a Web site, along with the names of spouses and even photographs of children and copies of signatures." Isn't that what you just did in your presentation? You used and reprinted my signature. Seems like hypocrisy to me, Ken. More on that below.


How come Chuck never told y'all about the unlawful raid in 1998? Stop trying to bury the facts, Ken. It was all documented already in the FAQ from 1998


WAZZZZZ UP!!!

WAZZZZZ UP!!!

By the way, Special Ken, fix your Power Point Presentation, it appears you "double speak" in it.

You state the previous owner, "Steven-William: Sutcliffe, 'posted all employees Social Security Numbers.

Actually and factually for the record, he was accused of only posting around 14 hundred employee's SSN’s, home addresses etc. The word "all" is just another lie, one of many...since, in fact, all would be "all 9000 employee' SSN’s, home addresses, telephone numbers, and much more."

A CPA like yourself should know NUMB3RS better, Ken. Get your facts and 1's and 0's straight, because your jig is up.

LOOMING

And I noticed your frequent use of the word "posted." As in "There's an old poster out West..." Did you mean publisher?


Ken, before I holla at your brain some more, did you know that, “The mission of the Justice Department is the evenhanded application of the Constitution and the laws enacted under it, and that mission has to start with the evenhanded application of the laws within our own department,” said Peter Carr, a department spokesman.

Beating of Kelly Thomas

Beating of Leone

BAD COPS

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!

COWARDS!

 

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Bookmark and Share

Sign my Guestbook

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum