1028(a)(7) Void

STATUS OF THE COLOR OF THE LAW (pdf)

If no lawyers out there want to "assist" in over-turning an illegal and unjust sentence and conviction of a (Certified!) incompetent defendant in a complex computer case...we understand totally, but if not for killercop, then do it for the children.

 

Or I'll trade you a CD ROM. But not these CD ROMS...

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.

But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!

So you're "shopping the field."

Okay, shop this.

Held: Section §1028(a) supposedly requires the Government to show that the accused knew that the means of identification at issue belonged to another person.

Elena and Debra never proved that during the trial. Inter alia.

Any good lawyers out there want to "assist" in over-turning an illegal and unjust sentence and conviction of a (Certified!) incompetent defendant in a complex computer case? Maybe we can discuss it over a big Mac.

 

But then again, Judge A. Howard Matz is usually wrong in his opinions, especially about Freedoms, Liberty and Speech.

 

And he practices a form of law he calls, "Just 'cause I say so..." Just like the mob.

 

Sounds like Extortion!! Lets ask an Expert.

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.