1028(a)(7)
Void
STATUS OF THE COLOR OF THE LAW (pdf)
OKAY, IN KILLERCOP'S CASE IT DID. SO THERE!!

If no lawyers out there want to "assist" in over-turning an illegal and unjust sentence and conviction of a (Certified!) incompetent defendant in a complex computer case...we understand totally, but if not for killercop, then do it for the children.

Or I'll trade you a CD ROM. But not these CD ROMS...
Survive In Prison Or Jail - A How To Jail Guide Speeding Ticket Secrets! Insider Tips, Tricks And Strategies!
Surviving Martial Law!
How To Survive The Coming Food Crisis!
Crisis By Design!
What 300 Million Americans Need To Know!
Join The Movement To Impeach Barack Obama!
Easy Naturalization: Easy And Fast Way To Become A US Citizen!
How To Win Child Custody!
Divorce Strategies And Tactics!
Focused Interviewing System Of Interview And Interrogation!
Legal Forms, Contracts And Agreements!
Dealing With False Restraining Orders. |
Get this...you don't have to "show any specific person," so you can shop from the field.
Held: Section §1028(a) [supposedly] requires the Government to show that the accused knew that the means of identification at issue belonged to another person. Not the person of another.
Elena and Debra never proved that during the trial. Inter alia.
Any good lawyers out there want to "assist" in over-turning an illegal and unjust sentence and conviction of a (Uncertified!) incompetent defendant in a complex computer case? Maybe we can discuss it over a big Mac. There appears to more of them out there languishing in prisons sent there by Hizzzzzzz Odor, Lord Matz, of the Ninth Realm of the God and Wizard of Oz.
If only Judge Matz had known! But then again, Judge A. Howard Matz is usually wrong in his opinions, especially about Freedoms, Liberty and Speech.
And he practices a form of law he calls, "Just 'cause I say so..." Just like the mob.
Sounds like Extortion!! Lets ask an Expert.
|
 |