Woof! Snarl! Growl! Byte! Bad Boy, Bad Boy!! Heel! Or is it heil? Call Jeff and ask him!! (310) 420-5197 jeffrey.cugno@ic.fbi.gov

 

 

A MESSAGE TO ALL OF THE POLICE WHO WITNESSED THIS CRIME TAKE PLACE IN THE STATE OF THE NEW-HAMPSHIRE, THE "LIVE FREE OR DIE" STATE, AND DID NOTHING. BUT LAUGH.

 

A CALL TO ARMS!

 

I can, but do not need to defend myself And the absurd accusations that the average press has clinged onto. If we need a nude photo of me to prove that I am far different than the soon-to-be-murdered-in-their-home members of a certain secret society has decided to fabricate, that is easy. But if one more "journalist" makes a cavalier statement about me ..., I will personally or with my fans help, greet them at their home and discover just how much they believe in their freedom of speech. I dare you all to write one more thing that you won't say to my face. Because I will make you say it. In that manner. That is a threat. Mm

 

 

ON THE RECORD WITH HIZZZZZZZZZZZ ODER

 

"In addition, the behavior that Killercop engaged in, in connection with this particular series of charges and his conduct after he was placed in custody suggests that he has a strong view that these charges are bogus and that his rights and dignity as an individual have been compromised and invaded..."

 

 

KILLERCOP: "Mrs. Greenwood, after you made the statement, "On the Killercop indictment, 'could he get more time' if more counts were added? If yes, I could search through and 'come up' with more threats," did you not continue and say, "For example, he had a page from Mark Labaton 'In honor of the recently deceased." Did you not make that statement immediately following that?"

 

GREENWOOD: " No. My recollection, from what I saw a few minutes ago, is yes. I'm not a hundred percent sure because I don't have the document in front of me, but that is my recollection from what I saw a few minutes ago."

 

KILLERCOP: "To accomplish your goal, which you couldn't do by shutting down the website because it's not against the law to publish information, you decided you were going to go through this website and you were going to get your goal and you are going to create threats that are not there, and you are going to take statements that are just out of context or vague statements --"

 

THE COURT: "Okay, Killercop, I have told you --"

 

KILLERCOP: "I'm just trying to ask her a question, Your Honor."

 

THE COURT: "Okay. You asked that question before. I granted the government's objection and you heard why and you are doing it again. Don't repeat anything which you've already been precluded from doing or about which I've already issued a ruling. I want to explain something to you, ladies and gentlemen. Killercop is entitled, and will have the opportunity, to argue what he thinks the evidence shows and fails to show and permissible inferences from the evidence. . .

 

Whether or not it is a legally correct proposition that it's not a crime to post threats is something I will explain to you, and I will tell you what the law is as to that.

So whether it's Killercop or the prosecutor, if somebody asks a question of a witness and puts into the question an assertion of what the law is, you are not bound by that. I told you that at the beginning. A question isn't evidence. And counsel and the defendant in this case are not entitled to try to tell you what the law is in the form of their questions. Now, proceed, Killercop..."

 

 

KILLERCOP: Factually, I never got to finish my question before your rude interruption, nevertheless.

 

"Now, Mrs. Greenwood, where you were interested in coming up with more threats where you wanted to search through this website so that Killercop could get more time added, other than the -- when I read to you the, "For example, he had a page from Mark Labaton 'In honor of the recently deceased,' now did you ever make the statement also in there that "the Labaton threat" was particularly disturbing?"

GREENWOOD: "Yes, I believe I did write that in there."

 

KILLERCOP: So the words, "In honor of the recently deceased," which linked to an article on the demise and Global Crossing sinking
into Chapter 11, was particularly disturbing; is that your testimony?"

 

GREENWOOD: "Yes."

 

 

 

KILLERCOP: "WELL, OKEY DOKIE THEN. THAT SOUNDS "REASONABLE" TO ME, IF BY REASONABLE YOU MEAN NUTZ. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT TORTURE?

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!

THE END.

CUJO THE RABID DOG EATS MEAT AND POTATO'S!

 

A.K.A. K.K.K.? Nope! The D.O.J! Department of Jihad

 

He and his partner stood by and did nothing while I was choked by the cops while being booked, for speech crimes, in Manchester, New Hampshire. The "Live Free Or Die" State.

 

Instead of stopping the choking, he laughed.

 

Because he selectively arrested me. He didn't really understand the law, or care about it at all.

 

And now someone is going to die. And I have to pay another reward. But first I have to sell something in commerce, so I can raise the prices! Oh, ecxcuse me, interstate commerce.

 

 

Are you still laughing, Jeff?

 

If so, then you are the one who is nutzzzz, or as they call it in the federal system, incompetent.

 

But they can only say that about ya if ya git one of them-thar Sirtifffffy Cates!

 

Me? I am still "un certifiably" competent. So I guess that makes me, ummm, "incompetent," or "un incompetent," without one of them-thar Sirrtifffffy Cates? But I am no expert.

 

Don't try to understand it, it is too complex for the F.B.I. (.pdf)

 

But if ya buy me a Big Mac, we can discuss it over a beer. And for the record, Special Ken is not invited. Or Chuck.

 

I must warn you though, due to the "treatment on my throat" by the cops in Manchester, I now have to whisper.

 

Am I being clear? You were the agent who typed up the facts for the indictment ...right? I know, another "mistake," right? So again, all I am left with is unanswered questions by Hizzzzzoner, and your agent friends, as to why you allowed this. And this? And what do you propose we do about that 800 pound White Elephant sitting in the middle of the room?

 

Aside from the choking. I know you told me once, in the prison; when Judge Matz forced(?) you to hand deliver some of my "discovery," that wasn't lost/stolen, that you weren't sure why you didn't stop them from choking me...have you figured it out? Are you one of the hooded bigots? Or are you a part of the hate machine?

 

And why did you let Dan, above, go? Was he Schmoe? Was he a part of the coporate prison machine? Did Schmoe buy out, like Gary and the Gang?

 

It was fundamental. Sort of like the "If you're not with us, then you're against us," the mob rules and a gang mentality. I totally understand now. It has become "pretty clear." But that is probably really overstating my point.

 

 

But I guess you're a "reasonable" listener, right? So it doesn't really matter what I say, one of the Department Of Jihad attorneys can go and twist my words anyway thay want under the listener standard. And if that won't work they still got the reasonable speaker standard, too. Anything but what the actual law says, right? They sure won't use that.

 

One last thing, were you ordered by the exalted Cyclops, Dragon or Wizard to do this cover up? Or was it the Goblin? And did you cheat on your test, too?

 

Don't bother to answer, I figured it out in my head during all those illegal and unlawful years in prison.

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!

COWARDS!

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Sign my Guestbook

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum