 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
SAY WHAT? ...federal agents said that I had also "developed a Web site that referred to officers from the Los Angeles Police Department and included multiple references to maiming and killing police officers with weapons and tools." -New York Times March 28, 2002 CUJO THE RABID DOG EATS MEAT AND POTATO'S! A.K.A. K.K.K.? Nope! The D.O.J!
Agent Cugno did nothing while I was choked by the cops while being booked, for speech crimes, in Manchester, New Hampshire. The "Live Free Or Die" State. Instead of stopping the choking, he laughed. Because he selectively arrested me. He didn't really understand the law, or care about it at all. And now someone is going to die. And I have to pay another reward. But first I have to sell something in commerce, so I can raise the prices! Are you still laughing, Jeff? If so, then you are the one who is nutzzzz, or as they call it in the federal system, incompetent.
But they can only say that about ya if ya git one of them-thar Sirtifffffy Cates! Me? I am still "un certifiably" competent. So I guess that makes me, ummm, "incompetent," or "un incompetent," without one of them-thar Sirrtifffffy Cates? But I am no expert. Don't try to understand it all, it is too complex for the F.B.I. But if ya buy me a Big Mac, we can discuss it over a beer. Or a Coffee. And for the record, Special Ken is not invited. Or Chuck. R.I.P. I must warn you though, due to the "treatment on my throat" by the cops in Manchester, I now have to whisper. Am I being clear? You were the agent who typed up the facts for the indictment ...right? I know, another "mistake," right? So again, all I am left with is unanswered questions by Hizzzzzoner, and your agent friends, as to why you allowed this. And this? And what do you propose we do about that 800 pound White Elephant sitting in the middle of the room? Aside from the choking. I know you told me once, in the prison; when Judge Matz forced(?) you to hand deliver some of my "discovery," that wasn't lost/stolen, that you weren't sure why you didn't stop them from choking me...have you figured it out? Are you one of the hooded, racist bigots? Or are you a part of the hate machine? And why did you let Dan above go? Was he Schmoe? Was he a part of the coporate prison machine? Did Schmoe buy out like Gary? Don't bother to answer, I figured it out in my head during all those illegal and unlawful years in prison. It was fundamental. Sort of like the "If you're not with us, then you're against us," the mob rules and a gang mentality. I totally understand now. It has become "pretty clear." But that is probably really overstating my point. But I guess you're a "reasonable" listener, right? So it doesn't really matter what I say, one of the Department Of Jihad attorneys can go and twist my words anyway they want under the listener standard. And if that won't work they still got the reasonable speaker standard, too. Anything but what the actual law says, right? They sure won't use that. One last thing, were you ordered by the exalted Cyclops, Dragon or Wizard to do this cover up? Or was it the Goblin? And did you cheat on your test, too?
PS: This guy probably and most likey broke a federal law if he did not promptly report me for his claim I am threatening federal officials since 2002. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
