Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre.

 

 

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

Circumstances do not make a man, they reveal him.” – James Allan

 

PRESUMED GUILTY

JUDGE MATZ SAYS:

 

The fact is that Killercop used not only ENTIRELY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE but was in a situation, was perceived to be in a situation, was none at the time of the indictment to be in a situation that there was no information suggesting Schmoe, whoever that is, was in.” ~JUDGE HOWARD MATZ, COVERING UP KILLERCOP'S SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS FOR A SELECTIVE PROSECUTION.

 

THAT SUCKS

JIVE TALKING TURKEY, THAT'S JUST THE MAN'S DENIAL OF THE ANSWER OF THE QUESTION OF THE JURISDICTION!


 

ONE CAN'T HAVE THE TARGET BECOME THE VICTIM. IT'S NOT GOOD FOR BU$INE$$!! SO SAY THE CORRUPTED COPORATE CEO. AND THE CROOKED JUDGE. IT'S NOT COOL! CHILDREN IN AMERICA LIKE COOL.

 

 

BUT, I BET THEY HATE LOCK DOWN PRISON DRILLS.

 

BUT AMERICA IS DOING THE BEST TO PREPARE THEM FOR LIFE IN AMERICA,

 

WITHOUT ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, OF COURSE. BOUGHT AND PAID FOR...TO SERVE AND DECEIVE.

 

BEAN LADEN

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

The Trial of Judge A.Howard Matz

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

TORTURED COVER UP

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

CROOKED COPS ON THE RUN

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!

THE END.

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player

JOE SCHMOE, A.K.A. JOE COOL

JOE SCHMOE, A.K.A. JOE COOL, A.K.A.TED? A.K.A. i THINK IT WAS GARY. OR MARK.


Trial of Killercop: Pages 2184-2185

JUDGE MATZ HAS HORNY FRIENDS

Closing argument by Elena Duarte A.U.S.A. on behalf of Debra Wong Yang, Trial By Matz and Appeal By Kozinski.

YANG

"And I also ask, when you consider Killercop's intent, which you will do, that you keep in mind the following:

When you consider whether Killercop knew what threats were and he intended to threaten, that he has made a great deal out of the Joe Schmoe threat. You remember Joe Schmoe? I'm going to personally [SHE INTENT-IONALLY OMITTS THE WORDS "Kick your ass,]... if you don't take my information down."

"He made so much of that Joe Shmoe threat, which you can see in Exhibit 76, and one of his as well, I think it is, that you heard evidence that on the seized computer from his house, he had constructed part of a website. It wasn't posted [transmitted] yet. "

"Our expert Mr. Siebert talked about it. And its hard copy is Exhibit 76. And in that portion of the website that was under construction but wasn't posted [transmitted] yet, [ Ignore that fact because I'll then have no power and then have no jurisdiction!]

Killercop had a whole category called "Threats of the death." Do you remember that? And the "threats portion linked to the Joe Shmoe that, "I will kick your ass," and the death portion linked back to the threat against Tracy Hall."

""Threats of the death, death threats," no reference to litigation, no reference to anything but "pure" threats, because he knew what he was doing and he meant to do it. Thank you. I have nothing [further. ]"

Transcript of 12.04.2002

Docket #71 & 73

Lists “Hillary Potashner” on behalf of the defendant, page 2.

Counsel appearing factually was “Bill” Harris, Esq.

 

Page 4, Lines 18-20

Judge Matz: “Killercop, one of Killercop’s e-mails itself noted that the antagonism which lead to these inherently threatening exchanges was very personal."  

Page 4, Lines 23-25

“The text of the letters(sic), all of those, of the communications, all of those in Counts 1 through 4 reflect ‘inherent’ threats.” [As opposed to ‘Fake,’ ‘False,’ and ‘Un-inherent’ threats, or any other such subjective-adjective.]  

Page 5, Lines 13-15

Judge Matz: “So I reject the notion that this pure speech. It is conduct. It’s inherently threatening and there is no basis … “   I KNOW IT WHEN I HEAR IT.

Page 5, Lines 21-22

Judge Matz: It’s conduct, it’s clearly proscecutable and that’s the basis for my ruling.”

See U.S. v. Cassel and U.S. v Brice, 926 F.2d 925, 931 (9th Cir. 1991)

 

 

Response to New Selective Prosecution Motion to Dismiss, Based on Joe Schmoe E-Mail

Page 6, Lines 3-5

Judge: “[t]hat single E-Mail [Joe Schmoe] which was a response to a provocative communication previously sent is not in any meaningful respect comparable or like the series of communications that underlie and that constitute Counts 1 through 4.”

 

 

MATZ LINE OF THE DAY: Page 6, Lines 8-12

“The fact is that Killercop used not only entirely different language but was in a situation, was perceived to be in a situation, was none at the time of the indictment to be in a situation that there was no information suggesting Schmoe, whoever that is, was in.”

 

Page 6, Lines 14-15

 

The nature of the communications was different.. "

 

THIS IS WILLIAM HARRIS SPEAKING, NOT MATZ:  

Page 9, Line 1-9

 

“I agree whether its true or not is relevant. But I think you’re failing to acknowledge that the Schmoe E-mail was a response to an E-Mail or to posting at least, not an E-Mail but a posting on the web site.”

 

Page 9, Lines 14-16

 

Judge Matz: “But that’s not what Killercop was doing; these were messages and communications directed at specific people as well as others who chose to log on to the evilgx.com website.

Page 10, Lines 1

 

“But this [E-Mail from Joe Schmoe] isn’t ‘substantially similar.’”

 

ITS EXACTLY SIMILAR!!

 

Judge Matz then proceeds to change the subject from substantially similar to, Did the democrats control the Justice Department in the year 2002?” Lines 21-22, Ibid.

 

INTERUPTS COUNSEL @ Page 11, line 11

Closes mind to further argument. Lines 12-16, id.

 

Page 21, Lines 13-22

Judge: “It wouldn’t surprise me if the issues that Killercop chooses to emphasize at trial have to do with intent and context. [5]  Well, they could be affected by contents, some of these. If for example there was some evidence that on the next message he posted he said just fooling [6] or I thought that would get a rise out of you. And … [T]hat would be relevant evidence. That would be Brady evidence, that would be exculpatory evidence.”

 

.

Response to Greenwood Count

Page 14, Lines 16-17

“These are constant and recurring First Amendment concerns.” [4]

 

BUT THAT IS ALL YOU GET FROM HIZZZ ODER REGARDING THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE BILL OF YOUR RIGHTS. A CONCERN.

 

AN APPEARENCE.

 

MATZ IS MAD

BUT HE WANTS TO PLAY GOD. TO HAVE THE POWER TO SHUT DOWN THE INTERNET AND KILL IT WITH THE WORDS. LIKE A BLACK HAT WIZARD.

 



[1] There is no such e-mail ever sent by Killercop. The only testimony was regarding Greenwoods webpage as well as in the beginning regarding McAfee and the statement ‘I have instructed Counsel … personal.”  This was never transmitted via e-mail, nor was it proven accused transmitted to website.

[3] There is no such provocative communication previously sent, by the defendant, ever.

[4] See Transcript of  11.21.2002, Page 10, Lines 17-20

[5] Intent changed from General Intent to Specific Intent. Further, Context was addressed in Motion to Restore Website to Original Context.. Denied by the Court.

[6] See judge’s comment to killercop about how he would ‘kick you in the shins and smack you upside the head,” if Killercop decided to represent himself.

.

.

 

Beating of Kelly Thomas

Beating of Leone

BAD COPS

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!

COWARDS!

 

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Bookmark and Share

Sign my Guestbook

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum