875(C) DOESN'T EVEN [NECESSARILY] REQUIRE AN INTENT?

Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

By Emily P. Walker, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today
Published: June 23, 2011

WASHINGTON -- Data ... is speech that is protected by the First Amendment, and pharmaceutical companies have every right to buy that information and use it to target their marketing efforts, the Supreme Court has ruled.

The nation's high court handed down a verdict Thursday in the Sorrell v. IMS Health case, striking down by a 6-3 vote a 2007 Vermont law that that bans the practice of data mining -- the sale and use of prescriber-identifiable information for marketing or promoting a drug, including drug detailing -- unless a physician specifically gives his or her permission to use the information.

Vermont argued that selling identifying information is "conduct," not "speech," but the Supreme Court didn't buy that and ruled that "the creation and dissemination of information are speech for First Amendment purposes."

GENERALLY SPEAKING

CONDUCT AND INTENT.

"The VERY powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common, instead of altering their views AND OPINIONS to fit the facts, they try to alter the facts to fit their views."

THE EVIL GOBLINS OF THE WORLD USE SUBTLE "SUGGESTIONS." OR PLAIN OL' DISINFORMATION.

THEY ONLY FOOL THEMSELVES." WHILE TRYING TO FOOL OTHERS. ~KILLERCOP 2010

KILLERCOP: " She said she would meet with me the following week to discuss this matter further. As with all of Ms. Potashner's promises, she failed to keep her promise to meet with me the following week or to provide details of the secret investigation she and the public defender's office allegedly had conducted of the torture.

I have repeatedly told both of my public defenders of my torture and physical abuse by the Manchester Police Department and FBI and I believed this conduct constituted a felony attack on me."

JUDGE MATZ: "Killercop has the right to counsel, although, as with all rights to counsel, that can be waived, by conduct, or by choice. He had the right to testify; he had the right to
present evidence; he had the right to subpoena witnesses; he had the right to cross-examine."

HAD, AS IN PAST-TENSE.

A REPLY TO HIZZZ ODER

KILLERCOP: "Furthermore, I frankly don't understand why my
presence is needed here today because, as the conduct of the
government, the defense counsel, and this court's own action or April 7 clearly prove, all of you believe that the accused need not be present in the courtroom or, for that matter, not
present in the same state to make a finding -- A JUDICIAL FINDING OF A FACT that the accused is or is not incompetent as required by the law.

A finding of competency is one of a fact, not law."

AND NOW SOMEONE WILL DIE.

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...

ANOTHER PERSON PERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!

THE END.

CONDUCT UNBECOMING

A.K.A. The case of "I Say It Thice, It Must Be True!"

"I would like the record to reflect that I don't like being yelled at by Your Honor." ~Killercop to Judge Howard Matz, Transcript of 12.04.2002 Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM

JUDGE MATZ: "BUT EVEN IF IT'S ARMED WITH INFORMATION, IF IT'S INFORMATION THAT COULD BE ABUSED, THAT'S A -- I'M NOT QUESTIONING [THAT] THE PEOPLE --"

MS. DUARTE: "BUT HE WAS ARMED AS WELL. I MEAN, A RIFLE WAS FOUND IN HIS HOUSE AT THE TIME OF THE WARRANT."

JUDGE MATZ: "YES."

MS. DUARTE: "I MEAN, I'M NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT SPEECH. I JUST WANT THE COURT TO BE CLEAR ON THAT."

JUDGE MATZ: "NO, NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT. AND I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN THAT THIS "COULD" ESCALATE. AND BELIEVE ME, IF THERE WERE -- "IF" THERE WERE REAL INDICIA OF THAT, THAT I DIDN'T -- YOU KNOW, "IF" THERE WAS ANYTHING ABOUT USING THAT RIFLE, OR ANYTHING IN HIS PAST CONDUCT -- I MEAN, YOU HAVE
SOME CRIMINAL RECORD, BUT IT'S NOT -- IT REALLY WOULD NOT RISE TO THE LEVEL, I DON'T THINK, IN AND OF ITSELF CERTAINLY, OF POSING A REALISTIC THREAT OF VIOLENCE.

MS. DUARTE: BUT CERTAINLY, YOUR HONOR, THAT IS NOT PART OF THE 875(C), AND I KNOW THE COURT'S NOT SAYING IT IS. BUT 875(C)>> DOESN'T EVEN NECESSARILY REQUIRE AN INTENT TO
CARRY OUT OR ANY OF THOSE THINGS.

JUDGE MATZ: NO, NO. I'M NOT SUGGESTING THAT IT'S AN ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE AT ALL.

~Pretrial Hearing Of Killercop in 1984, Double Speak.

"'COULD' ESCALATE???? WELL YOU OF ALL PEOPLE WOULD KNOW "IF" SOMETHING IS POSSIBLE."

Practicing Law by Killercop:

"Is it possible that the price that you are referring to that had some meaning, some hidden meaning, could be referring to the terms and the conditions upon the first page that we looked at, called index.htm, had been violated and that the owner felt that the money owed was for violating the terms of those conditions to enter the website freely?"

JUDGE MATZ: "Okay. I’m going to prevent the witness from answering the question, because this is my standard "practice."

Ladies and gentlemen, we all know that anything is possible.

The question that calls for speculation, that lacks a foundation, is an impermissible question. "

OKAY, BUT HOW ABOUT THIS ONE THEN.

JUDGE MATZ: "In addition, the behavior that Killercop engaged in in connection with this particular series of charges and his conduct after he was placed in custody suggests that he has a strong view that these charges are bogus and that his rights and dignity as an individual have been compromised and invaded wrongfully.

That being the case, and he may be right, it may be these charges are never successfully established, there is a reinforced view on his part, at least I find that there is, that he has to and is inclined to take whatever steps he thinks are appropriate or necessary to protect his interest. Those can include further assaults or threats of violence." ~Pretrial Hearing Of Killercop

JUDGE MATZ: "So I reject the notion that this [pure] speech.

It is conduct. It's 'inherently' threatening and there is no basis what so ever to grant that motion to dismiss.

The threats were "coupled with links" as to Counts 5 through 9, as the government correctly points out, this is not simply posting information.

This is posting information and directing the reader in at least two of the counts the means under which the information could be misused to very great and direct detriment and injury of the victims.

I SAY IT THRICE!

It's conduct, it's clearly prosecutable and that's the basis for my ruling." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE TRIAL OF KILLERCOP

POOF!

JUDGE MATZ COULD NOT BE BOTHERED TO ASK THE GOVERNMENT FOR ANY PROOF IN BLACK AND WHITE.

THIS CASE WAS GOING TO BE DRAGGED OUT, SLOWLY. UNDER HIS CONDITIONS. AND NEVER AN APPEAL. IT WAS, AS I SAY, GETTING "COMPLEX." BUT NOT JUST ANY OL' "COMPLEX," BUT THE "MOST COMPLEX" CASE. ALL IN THE INTERESTS OF JUSTICE, OF COURSE. HE WAS GETTING READY TO PRACTICE THE SECRET RITUAL HE LEARNED WHILE HAVING SEX WITH A DONKEY UNDER A BLOOD RED MOON, WHILE HE DANCED THE NIGHT AWAY WITH ASS-SORTED OTHER PERVETS AND GOBLINS. SINCE HE WAS MAKING STUFF UP AS HE WENT. TRYING TO PLAY GOD.

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!

COWARDS!