Experts For The Defense: Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes.

Move along, folks... Nothing to be found here.





"I really have no response. Because the last time I checked, Judge A. Howard Matz is not much of an expert on computer issues, either." A.K.A. The case of "Represent OR Assisit, there is a difference, you know. CHECK THE FILE: SAY WHAT? 09.26.2003 "HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS ARE GOING TO BE PROTECTED, BUT NOT ALL" ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz, from 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24 SEE ALSO: Kozisayso I Kozisayso II Kozisayso III Pretrial of killercop Trial of killercop Playas within killercop The Secret Hearing The torture of killercop Recieved but not filed officially A Fact Survive In Prison Or Jail - A How To Jail Guide Speeding Ticket Secrets! Insider Tips, Tricks And Strategies! Surviving Martial Law! How To Survive The Coming Food Crisis! Crisis By Design! What 300 Million Americans Need To Know! Join The Movement To Impeach Barack Obama! Easy Naturalization: Easy And Fast Way To Become A US Citizen! How To Win Child Custody! Divorce Strategies And Tactics! Focused Interviewing System Of Interview And Interrogation! Legal Forms, Contracts And Agreements! Dealing With False Restraining Orders.		A.K.A. THE CASE OF THE EXPERTS FOR THE DEFENSE: NOT! Judge Matz: "Now [killercop] if you are relying on and if your lawyers are relying on outside experts to assist in any aspect of the defense, and it wouldn’t surprise me if they have to, given the nature of these charges." HMMMMMM, MAYBE THE MISSING EXPERTS STOLE THE CERTIFICATE? Transcript of 09.26.2003 Page 20 THE COURT: NOW, I DON'T THINK I T I S INAPPROPRIATE FOR THE RECORD TO NOTE THAT I'VE PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED EXPERTS, OR AT LEAST ONE EXPERT, I DON'T GO BACK AND CHECK THE FILE BUT AT LEAST ONE EXPERT, AND I THINK COULD HAVE BEEN MORE THAN ONE, SOMEBODY WITH SPECIFIC SKILL AND ADVANCED SKILL IN COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY AND INTERNET TECHNOLOGY AS WELL TO BE APPOINTED TO REPRESENT OR ASSISlT PRIOR COUNSEL. HAVE YOU SEEN ANY EXPERT REPORTS? MR. REED: NO. NOT AT ALL, YOUR HONOR. THE COURT: HAS ANYBODY DISCUSSED WITH YOU ANY OF KILLERCOP'S PRIOR LAWYERS, ANY EXPERT REPORTS THAT *MAY HAVE* BEEN GENERATED? MR. REED: NO, YOUR HONOR Transcript of 10.21.2002 Page 36, Lines 20-25 Judge Matz: “Now, Mr. Reed, one of the items that Killercop has filed seems to suggest that he has never received any or any witness statements. Among the material that you received from prior counsel that you and Mr. Nicolaysen put together for delivery to MDC, do you recall whether any investigative reports prepared by anybody acting on behalf of Killercop? You don’t have to say who did it.” Reed: “On behalf of Killercop - -“ Judge: “Yeah.” Reed: “No.” DID YOU SEE THAT, FOLKS? No. None. Zip. Nada. Gar nichts. Rien du tout. Bupkes. How ya like those apples in a "complex computer case?" You bought them!! Paid for by your tax dollas! Not once, but three times!!! DON'T BELIEVE ME? ASK JUDGE MATZ' GOOD BUDDIES! NEW! CALL JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ: Telephone: 213-894-5283 Telephone: 213-894-2449 COMING SOON! CALL A CROOKED, SPECIAL AGENT IN 2011