Move along, folks... Nothing to be found here.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

c

Home|A Secret|A Mistake

A Rape|A Ring|A Tale Of Woe

Juris-diction|Cause Isayso

|Cover up|Jury Trial|Witch Hunt |Videos|Fascists|No Rights|Conduct|Confused|Intent|

|Indictment|Huh?|Process|

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

Lawmakers' bad laws costly to freedom of speech:


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Jun 29, 2005 ASSEMBLY MEMBER NOREEN EVANS 7TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT CONTACT: Sean MacNeil PHONE: (916) 319 - 2007

 

Evans Claims Bill Helps (Ipolice) Public Safety and Government Officials Protect Themselves and Families at Home from "Intimidation" or Attack (SACRAMENTO)


A bill authored by Assembly member Noreen Evans (D-Santa Rosa) passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee yesterday evening that will help public safety and government officials keep their personal home addresses and phone numbers private. AB 1595 passed with a vote of 5-0. It now passes to the Senate Public Safety Committee. "Anyone with internet access can find the home address and telephone numbers of public safety and elected officials,” said Evans. "Those who serve their fellow citizens should be able to do so without their families at home becoming the target of intimidation or an attack. Sadly, this threat is very real."

 

Various websites specialize in providing this information and the harmful intentions of some are self-evident. www.killercop.com - now inoperable - offered a cash reward with no questions asked for the death or home addresses of two LAPD officers. Another currently inoperable website, www.justicefiles.org, fostered vigilantism by providing names, addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers of police officers. To keep this information from aggrieved individuals seeking to intimidate or exact revenge, AB 1595 enables public safety and government officials to prevent individuals, businesses, and associations from publicly posting their home addresses and phone numbers once a written confidentiality request is submitted. “This bill specifically provides public servants – such as judges, district attorneys, public defenders, sheriffs, police, mayors, city attorneys, city council members, and boards of supervisors – with a statutory basis to obtain a court order mandating that this information be removed from a website operating under questionable intentions,” added Evans. “Typically, it takes approximately one week to a month to obtain such a court order.”

This bill originated in the January 2004 findings of California's Public Safety Officials’ Home Protection Advisory Task Force. Chaired by the Attorney General, it included representatives from the Department of Justice, the California Highway Patrol, the Office of Privacy Protection, the judicial and criminal justice community, state recorders and assessors, and the business community. AB 1595 is supported by the Judicial Council of California, the California District Attorneys Association, the California Association of Public Defenders, the California Judges Association, the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, the Peace Officers Research Association of California, LA County District Attorney, LA County Police Chiefs Association, LA County Sheriff, San Bernardino County Sheriff, Whittier Police Department, and the California Alliance for Consumer Protection.

SOURCE LOCATION OF ARTICLE BEFORE ITS REMOVAL IN 2010

Source


AB 1595 is supported by the Judicial Council of California, the California District Attorneys Association, the California Association of Public Defenders, the California Judges Association, the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, the Peace Officers Research Association of California, LA County District Attorney, LA County Police Chiefs Association, LA County Sheriff, San Bernardino County Sheriff, Whittier Police Department, and the California Alliance for Consumer Protection.

 

Source


AB 1595 seeks to strengthen existing law that offers government and public safety officials protection regarding the privacy of their personal information — namely home address and telephone number. Existing law now prohibits a state or local agency from posting personal information of specified elected or appointed individuals without first receiving written consent. Among the provisions in AB 1595 is one that would expand the universe of individuals who are provided a "super equal protection" by this prohibition to include state administrative law judges, federal judges, federal defenders, members of the U.S. Congress, and presidential appointees. The measure makes several other changes, including expanding prohibition against public posting or display of officials’ home addresses or telephone numbers on the Internet with the intent to cause bodily harm.

 

Source

 

 


$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

The Trial of Judge A.Howard Matz

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. (.pdf) But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...

STUPID DEMONS

I'm no expert. Anyone seen an expert yet?(.pdf) Maybe the Goblin ate him!! He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. But tell him to hurry, 'cause I am about to get legally crazy again, on account of it. But it's a secret.

Here is the rule of law: Wherever Law ends, Tyranny begins. And that's a fact! Why? CauseIsaySo!! You are not entitled to anymore information, 'cause ya got no right to it. Git it? I bet you will soon enough. I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone in 2010.

BAD ACTORS

Now move along folks, nothing more to see. Make like a Quack and disappear like Dr. Who.

"The report of my death was an exaggeration."~ Mark Twain

Noreen Evens

 

A TRUE THREAT TO DRIVERS, AND TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Corporate owned lawyers and agents should be ordered to pay for their own mishaps. And mistakes and technical errors, too! Even the Hybrid ones, specially those ones.

 

BY DON THOMPSON, Associated Press Article Last Updated: 06/09/2007 08:47:13 PM PDT SACRAMENTO -


Lawmakers using state-issued vehicles filed auto insurance claims at a far higher rate than the general public, costing California taxpayers nearly $90,000 the past two years, according to records obtained by The Associated Press. Those records show that 10 lawmakers filed more than one claim during the two-year period, including state assembly member Noreen Evans.

ASSEMBLY Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa May 17, 2006, windshield damage, $516.84. Aug. 14, 2006, unspecified damage, $1,506.12.


THE FOLLOWING TAKES PLACE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 11:00 A.M. AND 12:00 PM, ON 11.21.2002, Docket # 65

Page 14,1 –22
Harris: “This is a computer case where counsel for Mr. Sutcliffe is like a child learning the scales and Mr. Sutcliffe is playing Beethoven piano sonatas.  And that’s about where it’s at.  And in MDC [prison] we cannot even have a computer unless I am there, sitting there, with all my other cases, to allow Mr. Sutcliffe to have a computer.  So with him –“

Court: “Pleas explain to me why your ability effectively to represent him is dependent upon some level of insight or prowess concerning computer technology that you currently lack.”

Harris: “Because these websites are on disks, it’s a matter of manipulating the disks, going back and forth, pulling this out, pulling that out, cross-checking.  If this second website is allowed to come in, the task is doubled .”

Court:  Would your ability effectively to represent him be enhanced if, at government expense, at public expense, you were allowed to retain an expert?

Harris: “You know, what it would really be – an easier solution would be to direct MDC to let Mr. Sutcliffe have access to that computer in the visiting room without me being there.”

Court: “That I will not do.

Page 14, Line 25 – Page 15, Lines 1-23
Court: “But I thought you’re the one who needs to get the – I don’t mean to minimize what I think you’re telling me, because I am in the same boat as you…”  

Harris: “[t] here’s not enough time if I did it 24 hours between now and December 3 that I’d be able to do this thing adequately.”

Court: “In other words, what you’re saying is that the evidence that has been turned over to you, you need your client to evaluate?”

Harris: “Right.  Its like if he spoke –- If it was in Chinese and he spoke Chinese and I didn’t, and we’re trying to go over and find the gems and uncover them.”

Page 17, Lines 14 – 24
Harris: “No, I mean I’m happy to talk to their investigator, and I don’t that’s as big of a concern as the fact that – the bigger concern is that its tough enough to try represent a client and get ready for trial when they’re in custody anyway, other thing being equal; in a computer case where you’ve got all sorts of computer evidence coupled with the problem that the client has technical expertise that the lawyer doesn’t, it just compounds the issue.  And all I’m saying is if there’s a way that we can address flight and danger where --  “

Judge: “Well, that would be my ruling on it.”

Page 18, Lines 8-17
Judge: “I’m reaching out for ways to make sure that you, who I know to be a very dedicated, skillful lawyer, will be able to get ready for trial and mount an effective defense so if you find there is some kind of benefit that could accrue to your client if an expert were appointed, and you can locate one and set forth standard information about why and what kind of expertise the individual has and what his hourly rate would be, I would be very inclined to grant that application and, as you know, that application  doesn’t have to be made available to the prosecution.”


The other website was, in fact, allowed in on the lie of the prosecutor on January 10, 2003, another reason for the dismissal of Harris for failure to object to her lie.

Transcript of 09.26.2003, Lines 15-18 Prosecutor: “I don’t think the court necessarily means hard drives because hard drives wouldn’t - - or maybe it does.”

Judge: “Don’t assume I know what I’m talking about. So just correct me if I’m wrong.”

After you forced your attorney, and left me to the mercy of your pack of wolves, the Warden beeeeeeatch slapped ya and told ya No. So why did you have him tazed and threatened that he would be my cell mate if he didn't follow unlawful orders? But this Warden wasn't about to stick his neck out for your unlawful acts under color of law.

THE SPIRIT OF KILLERCOP

'Don't Tase Me, Bro' Or I'll Pop A Glock In Your Mouth And Make A Brain Slushie, And Collect A Large Cash Reward From Killercop.com! Where Injustice Is For Sale! A Nation Of Men And Not Rules And Laws.

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuanna provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey!

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

Bookmark and Share

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum