Move along, folks... Nothing to be found here.

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

c

Home | A Secret | A Mistake

A Cover Up | Jurisdiction | Woe

A Ring | Just 'cause | A Raid

| Corruption | Witch Hunt | Email | Videos | Fascists | A Rape
MAYDAY IN AMERICA! c c c
c

NOW OPERABLE!

 

MAYBE WE CAN CONVINCE JUDGE MUIRHEAD TO BITCH SLAP HER?

MAYBE HE CAN TEACH HER THAT NO MEANS NO!! AS IN CONGRESS SHALL PASS NO LAW...

MAYBE IF SHE WAS ABOUT TO BE RAPED IN THE ASS, IN THE PRISON IN WHICH THEY SENT KILLERCOP TO SERVE TIME IN, FOR HIS SPEECH AND THOUGHT CRIMES, THE WORD "NO" WOULD TAKE ON A WHOLE NEW MEANING IN HER ATTORNEY-MIND.

 

OR MAYBE HER MOMMY DIDN'T READ HER ANY BEDTIME STORIES, AS A CHILD.

 

MY FAVORITE IS: "LET'S KILL ALL THE LAWYERS"

 

THEY ARE AFTER ALL THE ONE'S INCITING THE COPS, UNDER ALL THE RULES, THESE RULERS OF PERSONS AND NOW PEOPLE.

 

I SURE WISH THEY WOULD LEARN TO TRAVEL.

 

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.

STUPID DEMONS

But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!

KILLERCOP AND THE KONFLIKT OF INTERE$T

 

Actual conflict, is not just a possibility of conflict, ‘through a factual showing on the record.’ ” Moore, 159 F.3d at 1157 (citing Morris v. California, 966 F.2d 448, 455 (9th Cir. 1991)); see also United States v. Shwayder, 312 F.3d 1109, 1117-20 (9th Cir. 2002) (holding that the defendant must show that “counsel was influenced in his basic strategic decisions” by the conflict of interest); United States v. Baker, 256 F.3d 855, 860 (9th Cir. 2001) (noting that an “attorney has an actual, as opposed to a potential, conflict of interest when, during the course of the representation, the attorney’s and the defendant’s interests diverge with respect to a material factual or legal issue or to a course of action”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.