|
WHEN THOSE IN AUTHORITY BREAK THE LAW, THEN THERE IS NO LAW, JUST A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL.
PRESENTING AN INSTRUMENTALITY THEORY?
PLAY ON, PLAYAS! BUT CAN YA CERTIFY IT?
"If you hear anything or see anything about this case
that in any way is affecting what you think is your reaction to
the case and it doesn't take place here in the court, while the
trial is in session, that's not evidence, even if what you see
or hear or overhear involves one of the parties to the case or
a witness to the case or an attorney in the case or anything
like that.
Only what happens in the trial, here in the
courtroom, in all of our presence, is evidence." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, pre-trial of Killercop, jury instructions.
ONLY ONE TRIBUNAL EVER ADOPTED A PRACTICE OF FORCING COUNSEL UPON AN UNWILLING DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING. THE TRIBUNAL WAS THE STAR CHAMBER. -U.S. v FARETTA , 422 US 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
WHAT WOULD BE THE CAPACITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OF THE COURTS TO SUPRESS THIS KIND OF SPEECH?" --Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL OF KILLERCOP
CORRUPTION EXPOSED IN THE SECRET TRIAL OF KILLERCOP.com.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled?
WOUNDED WIKI
FACEBOOK AND TWITTER
YOUTUBE
NY TIMES
WSJ
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
FAQ 1 FAQ 2 CONTEXT
All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 1997-2023 |
2 ACCIDENTAL, AGONIZING FACTS, WHY SOMEONE IS GOING TO DIE. A.K.A. "PROBABLY" A FINDING UNDER THE LAW. A.K.A. THE CASE OF IT POSSIBLY MIGHT BE PRUDENT TO AT LEAST LOOK AT THE LAW THEN, NO?
YOU HAVE TO LOOK, AND LISTEN! YOU ARE MY CAPTIVES! SO DO IT PROMPTLY!!!
Nicolaysen: “May I inquire of Your Honor whether or not the court is planning to make any "factual findings" in regard to the "reasonable cause standard" under the stature since there are no findings that have been submitted by the government?”
Please observe how carefully all of the players, in the following unlawful hearing, avoid the words "of fact."
Normally one would say, and the law does say, "a finding of fact."
They all knew that following 'fact,' in the law, but their guilty conscience would not allow them to use the words "of fact," after the words "a finding..."
FACTS:
Here is Killercop's findings of A fact.
They conducted an unlawful and illegal hearing. And I had a right to be there. They all knew that fact. And they conspired on how to get around the law. To borrow their word, they "agonized" over their guilt. Which shows their GUILTY intent.
They are all guilty of violating the Oath of Office, inter alia, to protect the Constitution.
They are all guilty of committing conspiracy to violate civil rights, and multiple violations of the Due Process Clause.
They are all guilty of violating my fundamental rights under the Confrontation Clause.
They are all guilty of violating MY RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
IN THESE PARTS OF THE WILD WEST, ALL MEANS ALL. SAME AS NO MEANS NO. ASK ANY RAPE VICTIM.
THEY ALL IGNORED THEIR OATHS, THE FACTS, THE RULES THE LAW AND THE 5TH AND 6TH AMENDMENTS AND PROCEEDED FORWARD WITH A SELECTIVVE PERSECUTION IN A SECRET HEARING.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation to support this website from being censored. This is a battle for speech and the First Amendment needs your support, or it is gone. Any amount helps in the battle! Thank you and may God bless you, in peace and at war.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE
|
 |
