2 ACCIDENTAL, AGONIZING FACTS


		CONTACT EMAIL KILLERCOP @ KILLERCOP.COM


WHEN THOSE IN AUTHORITY BREAK THE LAW, THEN THERE IS NO LAW, JUST A FIGHT FOR SURVIVAL. PRESENTING AN INSTRUMENTALITY THEORY? PLAY ON, PLAYAS! BUT CAN YA CERTIFY IT? "If you hear anything or see anything about this case that in any way is affecting what you think is your reaction to the case and it doesn't take place here in the court, while the trial is in session, that's not evidence, even if what you see or hear or overhear involves one of the parties to the case or a witness to the case or an attorney in the case or anything like that. Only what happens in the trial, here in the courtroom, in all of our presence, is evidence." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, pre-trial of Killercop, jury instructions. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA REASONABLE DOUBT DIRTY SECRETS AND MENTAL TORTURE TREATMENTS TO RESTORE YOUR MIND. (c) 1995-2026 All Rights Reserved	2 ACCIDENTAL, AGONIZING FACTS, WHY SOMEONE IS GOING TO DIE. A.K.A. "PROBABLY" A FINDING UNDER THE LAW. A.K.A. THE CASE OF IT POSSIBLY MIGHT BE PRUDENT TO AT LEAST LOOK AT THE LAW THEN, NO? YOU HAVE TO LOOK, AND LISTEN! YOU ARE MY CAPTIVES! SO DO IT PROMPTLY!!! Nicolaysen: “May I inquire of Your Honor whether or not the court is planning to make any "factual findings" in regard to the "reasonable cause standard" under the stature since there are no findings that have been submitted by the government?” Please observe how carefully all of the players, in the following unlawful hearing, avoid the words "of fact." Normally one would say, and the law does say, "a *finding of fact."* They all knew that following 'fact,' in the law, but their guilty conscience would not allow them to use the words "*of fact," after the words "a finding..." FACTS: Here is Killercop's findings of A fact. They conducted an unlawful and illegal hearing. And I had a right to be there. They all knew that fact. And they conspired on how to get around the law. To borrow their word, they "agonized"* over their guilt. Which shows their GUILTY intent. They are all guilty of violating the Oath of Office, inter alia, to protect the Constitution. They are all guilty of committing conspiracy to violate civil rights, and multiple violations of the Due Process Clause. They are all guilty of violating my fundamental rights under the Confrontation Clause. They are all guilty of violating MY RIGHT TO THE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. IN THESE PARTS OF THE WILD WEST, ALL MEANS ALL. SAME AS NO MEANS NO. ASK ANY RAPE VICTIM. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) COLLECT A BOUNTY COLLECT A REWARD KILLER MERCH FILE A COMPLAINT TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ EMAIL SALES @ KILLERCOP.COM (c) 1995-2026 All Rights Reserved