Chief Judge Kozinski in Obscenity Case Caught Posting Porn Online!

THINK ABOUT IT.

I LIVED IT.

In aFederal court hearing an appeal, it is the duty of the judges to be certain of their jurisdiction. They have a legal duty to inspect the record of the District trial court, sua sponte, to determine whether the District trial court held jurisdiction at all times, And if a Constitutional Right was violated, and/or if any officer of the court, whether judge or attorney, engaged in a "fraud upon the court".


				Home \| A Secret \| Rewards Racists Cops \| Jurisdiction \| Woe A Ring \| A Rom \| A Raid \| Corruption \| Witch Hunt \| Email Videos \| Fascist Pigs \|


Alex Kozinski admonished for raunchy Internet files Kozinski said he must have "accidentally uploaded those images to his server" while intending to upload something else. “I would not keep those files intentionally,” he said. "The court of appeals is where policy is made. And I know, I know that this is on tape, and I should never say that. Because we don't make law, I know," "OK, I know, I know. [We do, but] I'm not promoting it, and I'm not advocating it." ~ Judge Sonia Sotomayor 2009 Remember, this is the same woman who, when speaking at Duke Law School, made it clear that she believes it is a judge's role to "legislate from the bench": responding to a question on the pros and cons of different types of judicial clerkships, she stated that the court "is where policy is made!" She tried to correct her slip, by joking that "I know this is on tape and I should never say that, because we don't ‘make law,' I know, I know." But, she already made herself clear: She believes JUDGES MAKE LAW! And she is right. Justices rule, 5-4, that New Haven, Conn., was wrong to deny promotions to the firefighters, who outscored black colleagues on a test. The decision overturns a ruling supported by Sonia Sotomayor. Chief Judge Kozinski in Obscenity Case Caught Sharing "Obscene "Porn And Copyright Files. SEE ALSO: Widard of Koz Kozisayso II Kozisayso III Pretrial of killercop Trial of killercop Playas within killercop The Secret Hearing The torture of killercop Received but not filed officially The Melcher Man Kozinski thereafter summarily denied review, or any petition for rehearing, of this important jurisdictional Internet case by his decree alone, refusing to follow the law and to put it upon the vote of a majority of the non-recused active judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35 and Ninth Circuit General Order 5. No panel has unanimously voted to deny appellees' petition for rehearing. No judge voted to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, andso no judge has yet recommended rejection of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Because of Kozinski, no full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Therefore no active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration under Fed. R. App. P. 35(b), because of his cover up. But hey, who's following the law these days, right? Not this judge. Such raw, naked power shows that these judges are not to be considered mere "ordinary mortals" But, again, that's just this man's perspective. $PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$ OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA		Once upon a time... The Wizard Of Koz Speaks. "The Internet is "a seductive playground" for unscrupulous individuals bent on defrauding innocent victims. The facts before us clearly illustrate this point." A "Seductive Playground." You mean like the kind Perv's like you hang around??? The Wizard Of Koz Speaks, Again. [An Order From The Wizard Up North] Regarding The Motion [Received, But Never Filed] In This Trial. Notice how the Order above skates around and ignores Rule 35 and a vote required by the law. Why Are Briefs Not Brief? THE LOGIC FOLLOWS, JUST KOZ-I-SAY-SO: THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS WHEN YOU PUT FALSE WORDS INTO OTHER PEOPLES MOUTHS LIKE A PUPPET: (MP3) "WE NEED NOT PROVE YOU TRANSMITTED THE FILES JUST KOZ-U-SAY-SO." WHY NOT? KOZ WE NEED ONLY *ASSUME* JURISDICTION, NOT PROVE IT. AND THAT'S THE BREAKING POINT. BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS? Ninth Circuit panels "silently dustbinned" inconvenient opinions, paid "lip service" to Supreme Court case law, vaulted "somersaults" in creating three lines of authority "none of which agree with each other," and adopted a rule that has "the 'absolute simplicity' of Joseph Heller's 'Catch-22.'" 15 of the 16 cases? Oh My Gawd! If you feel the need to talk to killercop, don't, because he is talking to a man who doesn't exist.
		Contact \| © Copyright 1998-2009 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved..