Home | Killer Stuff | Rewards

Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy

Membership | The Enemy | Links |

Right To Remain Silent | Censored

Judges are but men, and are swayed like other men by vehement prejudices. This is corruption in reality, give it whatever other name you please.

Chief Judge in Obscenity Case Caught sharing "Obscene "Porn and copyright files.

EXCLUSIVE:

Judge's website was specifically intended for the sharing of pornographic material "People send me stuff like this all the time," he said. He also used a his "office" work computer to publish the files and he knew to specifically "exclude" the other jurist's that shared the site out of his server, for over two years, with a simple robot text file. He admits using the computer to research a legal split in the Ninth he opposed from his server in the article he wrote called Don't Split the Ninth Circuit. The files Kozinski was using are found here.

He denied knowing the "stuff" directory on his site was "public" but we''ve found a another piece of evidence. In June 2004, Alex Kozinski sent a public letter in HTML language, humorously nominating himself as part of a "Judicial Hottie contest"

Courthouse Forum: The Hot. Alex Kozinski

This letter contains links, and one sentence is:

" I bungee jump."

In there, "bungee jump" is linked to: http://alex.kozinski.com/stuff/jump.avi

Again, that's the key directory.

This shows that Judge Kozinski knew the general public could retrieve specific material from that directory, and in at least that case he invited the public to do so.

Alex Kozinski, last year, was also hand-picked to decide U.S. appeal case 04-50189, U.S. v Sutcliffe, a watershed, "sea change" case in the law of Internet jurisdiction, affecting millions of Americans lives and freedoms, how ironic his decision in that case now could land him in prison (MP3) under his "circumstantial inference rejection."

During oral arguments in case 04-50189, where jurisdiction had yet to be ruled on yet, Judge Alex, Stephen S.Trott, and the ringer they brought in from out of state to "visit," who knew nada about computer MAC address, FTP or IP address, Monroe G. McKay, to induce a little, good ol' days nostalgia about telephones, to help them invoke jurisdiction and obtain the power to "shut down" the Internet, which conveniently ignores law which requires specific intent and proof the accused transmitted, i.e., "loaded" the offending speech being called illegal. McKay prefers to use "circumstantial" evidence as a standard to convict Citizens. Listen here.

They drool at such power. They know how to weld the tool to suppress speech. That's why this judge now claims he accidentally loaded the images.

But his own decision in the above Sutcliffe case can now convict him for "attempting" to aid and abet obscenity since the standard is no intent need be shown under "the attempt" law carved out in the above case.

Prior to the Sutcliffe case, the Ninth Circuit had no jurisdiction on the Internet. (MP3)

Listen to Kozinski discuss Internet in the case with Sung Park here. (MP3) Listen to Kozinski discuss how a jury could "infer" guilt and specific proof of any fact not proven under the law by the government here.(MP3)

Even judge Mckay's words in that case kill his chance of not going to jail under the Sutcliffe denial of a "circumstantial standard" they carved out of whole cloth. Listen here.

Listen to Trott claim jurisdiction under the commerce clause and claim IT is so, because to him IT seems so. His last sentence spells the end of the Internet. Listen here. No law involved, just legal mumbo-jumbo. So...with that standard "it appears...Trott and Kozinski have been trading obscene pictures and movies on Kozinski's server." That's just this man's perspective.

Heck, Trott wants to get jurisdiction to "shut down the Internet." Listen to him joke about the power here. But they are not joking about this type of power.

During the oral argument in that case, one of several attorneys "forced" on the case, Sung Park, "falsely confesses" that the accused "loaded" a.k.a transmitted, the files. A fact the accused has always denied during trial and Sung Park clearly knew prior to the oral argument with Kozinski. Source file here.

Can't he use now Kozinski's defense, that, "I had no idea, but that sounds right, because I sure don't remember putting some of that stuff there?"

Kozinski thereafter summarily denied En Banc review of this important jurisdictional Internet case by his decree alone, refusing to put it upon the vote of a majority of the non-recused active judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.

Such raw, naked power shows that these judges are not to be considered mere "ordinary mortals" But, again, that's just this man's perspective.

Listen to the oral argument and Kozinski's discussion on the Internet and jurisdiction in it's entirety here. Case history found here. Appeal with exhibits found here. (WARNING: 16mg file size, recommend you right click and select "SAVE AS." to view it locally.)

This case stemmed all from Central District court in California, in case CR-02-350(A) AHM.

SEE ALSO: Nicolaysen, a.k.a. Another Attorney Computer "Expert" With His Own Website." (Will they never learn? Gosh, I hope not.)

04-50189 above is reminiscent of the lousy Kelley decision, with a visiting Justice; or the lousy Barken decision, with a visiting senior circuit judge; or the lousy Hosvaldo Lopez case, authored by a visiting district judge; or the lousy Crews case, authored by a visiting senior, district judge.

See the trend?

For an interesting discussion of the curious impact of visiting judges, see Sara C. Benesh, The Contribution of “Extra” Judges, 48 AZLR 301 (2006).

Alex Kozinski a.k.a. Another Computer "Expert."

UPDATE: EXCLUSIVE:

JUDGE ALLEDGEDLY TRADED IN CHILD PORN

Read about it here

Chief Judge in Obscenity Case Caught Posting Porn

Alex Kozinski (above), a conservative appointee of former president Ronald Reagan who is chief of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, posted a photo of naked women standing on all fours and painted to look like cows, as well as a video of a half-naked man with a farm animal. A step-by-step pictorial depicted a woman shaving her pubic hair and other images showed masturbation and what the Times called "contortionist sex."

The images were posted to a subdomain of the judge's web site that could only be accessed by directly typing in the correct URL. The domain, however, was not password-protected. In addition to the pornographic images, the subdomain contained legal writings, music files and the judge's personal photos.

The judge told the Times that he accidentally loaded the images to his server and would not have intentionally posted them. He said he thought some of the photos were "funny" but acknowledged that the photo of the women painted as cows was "degrading" and "gross." He said, however, that he didn't think the images were obscene.

Another site reported that there was a folder "which included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal. Some of the material was inappropriate, he conceded, although he defended other sexually explicit content as 'funny.'

Since when is cavorting with farm animals part of everyday life?

What “Stuff” was on Judge Kozinski’s Personal Website?

SEND US THE PICTURES AND MOVIES AND COLLECT A REWARD!

Did you stumble across any of the judge's perverted and "obscene" pornographic pictures and movies, before he realized he was caught? Ever trade with him?

Send them to us and collect a reward!

"The sexually explicit material on the site was extensive, including images of masturbation, public sex and contortionist sex. There was a slide show striptease featuring a transsexual, and a folder that contained a series of photos of women's crotches in snug-fitting clothing or underwear."

One lady appears in a black leather bondage outfit; handcuffs hang from her belt and she carries a coiled whip

THE BOTTOM LINE:

We at killercop.com mooooooove that Kozinski be remooooooved from the bench and indicted forthwith for his double standards under the law. That's just this man's perspective.

Contact | © Copyright 2007-2008 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved..