Kozinski said he must have "accidentally uploaded those images to his server " while intending to upload something else. “I would not keep those files intentionally,” he said.
The Case Of "It Appears We Never Met... " A.K.A A SIDEBAR OF XX AND XXX Files.
"The court of appeals is where policy is made. And I know, I know that this is on tape, and I should never say that .
Because we don't make law, I know," "OK, I know, I know. [We do, but] I'm not promoting it, and I'm not advocating it." ~ Judge Sonia Sotomayor 2009
Remember, this is the same woman who, when speaking at Duke Law School, made it clear that she believes it is a judge's role to "legislate from the bench": responding to a question on the pros and cons of different types of judicial clerkships, she stated that the court "is where policy is made!" She tried to correct her slip, by joking that "I know this is on tape and I should never say that, because we don't ‘make law,' I know, I know." But, she already made herself clear: She believes JUDGES MAKE LAW!
And she is right.
Justices rule, 5-4, that New Haven, Conn., was wrong to deny promotions to the firefighters, who outscored black colleagues on a test. The decision overturns a ruling supported by Sonia Sotomayor.
SEE ALSO:
Wizard of Koz Kozisayso II Kozisayso III Pretrial of killercop Trial of killercop Playas within killercop The Secret Hearing The torture of killercop Received but not filed officially The Melcher Man
Kozinski thereafter summarily denied review, or any petition for rehearing, of this important jurisdictional Internet case by his decree alone, refusing to follow the law and to put it upon the vote of a majority of the non-recused active judges pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c) and Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35 and Ninth Circuit General Order 5.
No panel has unanimously voted to deny appellees' petition
for rehearing. No judge voted to
reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc, andso no judge has yet recommended rejection of the
suggestion for rehearing en banc.
Because of Kozinski, no full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing
en banc. Therefore no active judge requested a vote on whether to
rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor
of en banc consideration under Fed. R. App. P. 35, because of his cover up.
But hey, who's following the law these days, right? Not this judge.
Such raw, naked power shows that these judges are not to be considered mere "ordinary mortals "
But, again, that's just this ordinary mortal's perspective .
$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA
A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:
Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear ?" Because I'm "pretty sure " it is not.
I know, it's complex. (.pdf)
But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.
But I'm no expert .(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!
JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI
The Wizard Of Koz Speaks.
QUOTE: "The Internet is "a seductive playground" for unscrupulous individuals bent on defrauding innocent victims . The facts before
us clearly illustrate this point."
The Wizard Of Koz Speaks, Again .
"I have caused embarrassment to the federal judiciary. I put myself in a position where my private conduct became the subject of public controversy. "
While this was painful for me personally, my greatest regret is that I was identified as a federal judge, indeed, as a Chief Judge of the nation's largest federal circuit. And thus whatever shame was cast on me personally , it reflected on my colleagues and our system of justice as well.
My unfortunate carelessness with certain files on my computer has embarrassed the federal courts. And for this, I am deeply sorry."
[ An Order From The Wizard Up North ] Regarding The Motion [Received, But Never Filed ] In This Trial
Notice how the Order above skates around and ignores Rule 35 and a vote required by the law.
Why Are Briefs Not Brief?
THE LOGIC FOLLOWS, JUST KOZ-I-SAY-SO:
THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS WHEN YOU PUT FALSE WORDS INTO OTHER PEOPLES MOUTHS LIKE A PUPPET : (MP3)
"WE NEED NOT PROVE YOU TRANSMITTED THE FILES EITHER, JUST KOZ-I-SAY-SO. "
WHY NOT?
KOZ WE NEED ONLY ASSUME NOT PROVE IT. LIKE YOU!
AND THAT'S THE BREAKING POINT.
BUT WHAT ABOUT THIS?
If you feel the need to talk to killercop , don't, because he is talking to a man who doesn't exist.
FRIENDS OF THE WIZ!
"And thus whatever shame was cast on me personally, it reflected on my colleagues and our system of justice as well. "
