I Love Nutz In My Matzo!

"I think that his outbursts serve a number of different purposes. One is to, obviously, let the court know his dissatisfaction over what's going on. I also think that it's a part of his way of necessarily taking kind of an offensive maneuver -- excuse me -- in delaying things.

Now -- but then, again, that is just kind of a side opinion. I didn't evaluate for that with him. I didn't specifically speak to him about that." ~{Dr.] Thomas Patanaude, Trial Of Killercop.com, Incompetence Hearing, Sept. 27, 2003, Los Angeles Distric Courthouse. California.

He means he didn't speak to killercop at all. He's making it all up! Of course that is my side opinion. "I didn't evaluate for that with him. I didn't specifically speak to him about that." Hahahahahahaha

Try telling the truth, such as, "I didn't evaluate him period. And moreover I didn't specifically speak to him."

Speaking of which, anyone seen the Certificate Required By The Law? It's missing, like the Doctor. And that's a fact!

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.

But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!

That's what I call nutz.

A sham of a sham.

The Indicment of the Spirit of Killercop.

We've got an indigent accused, improperly committed to a mental institution, impugning the credibility of the psychologist [who never examined him ]to determine his competency to both represent himself and to stand trial on August 27, 2003. Aside from the issue that the attorney for the defense was "forced" over and on the accused by the judge, under no authority.

The Judge in this case, A. Howard Matz, was to later that year learn, in a personal letter from the Warden, that the defendant's accusations on August 27, 2003 were true.

Yet Matz failed to report the knowledge of the crime, since he knew the accusations against the Doctor were "most likely" true and would cause him to lose personal jurisdiction. So he sat on the knowledge of the crime. In fact, time proved the words of August 27, 2003 to be all too true, and the Doctor quickly and quietly disapeared.

Which explaims the mysterious missing certificates, that both the law require[d] and justice demands be produced, in an impartial district, wherein the crime was committed. But that never happened either because of the coverup.

Notwithstanding the loss of the right to the effective assistance of counsel, and equal right to dispense with it. Or due process. Or even due process.

But that's because in their eyes, I am just...

So they lynched me.

But they never proved I transmitted anything, no matter what their hired guns say. But they did "transmit;" and I use the term loosely, something of interest.

That's what I call nutzzzz.

And that my readers is a fact.

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.