This court reviews de novo whether a defendant was denied the right to conflict-free representation.

Unless they are too busy watching and trading porn.

NEW: SOUND BYTES OF THE ORAL CONFESSION OF KOZINSKI AND SUNG, VIOLATING THE SEPERATION OF POWERS ACT, WHEN THEY AGREED TO "MAKE" LAW [POLICY].

A Bright Light Shone In The Sky

 

 

Right Off The Bat One Judge Tells Sung "The 'Breaking' Point."

 

The Opening Statement Of Park:

 

The Opening Statement Of Prosecutor:

 

Prosecutor Admits All Transfers Occurred By FTP

 

Prosecutor Admits They Have No Proof Killercop Transferred A Single Page By FTP.

 

Wouldn't It Have Been Nice To Have My Own Expert(s)? Judge Matz Made Sure That Never Happened.

 

Prosecutor Admits She In Fact Transferred The Files.(Taken Out Of Context, Of Course. For the Brevity)

 

Park Admits Government Has No Proof Of A Transfer.

 

I certainly never told him I transferred anything. That included the word "posted," for the record.

 

As In Nothing.

 

Judge Kozinski Seems To Believe Mysterious Things Happen With The Internet.

 

Like "Accidental Facts" Getting Routed Just To His Tiny Wizard Mind To Give Him The Jurisdiction Where He Has No Fact Other Then A False Confession, After He Spoon Feeds The Words To Make His False Record To Get Around The Fact That The Government's Burden Is They Must Prove Transmission And Not Just Assume It. Or Put Words Into The Jury's Mouth's, Either.

Otherwise Who Knows Where Their Power To Stop Ends

 

Shall We Just Round Everyone Up, Or Just The Usual Suspects.

 

I'll Bet Anyone That This Judge Is Gonna Be Really Upset That The Assistant Prosecutor Gave Me 8000 NUMB3RS.

 

Or Maybe Debra And She Didn't Tell Him, Either.

 

Hmmmmm, Then It's Our Little Secret.

 

We Do Want To Re-present The Record Accurately.

 

MY PETITION, WHICH THE WIZARD REFUSED TO FILE AS A MATTER OF A RECORD.

PRETRIAL AND TRIAL FILES

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not.

I know, it's complex. (.pdf)

But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified un-nutzzzzzz in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law, and the certificate required by the law.

But I'm no expert.(.pdf) Anyone see ours, yet? He has our certificate required by the law and I need it to be officially un-nutzzzzzz. And that's a fact!

Once Upon A Time He "Sung" Like A Bird

 

The appeal of the Esquire,

Right!! Correct!! A Real Yes Maker.

 

Meet the government's "re-presenter," A.K.A. the Public Pretender, appearing magically "for the defense,"and another of many forced on Killercop. But they saved the worse for the last.

The Melcher Man.

A Couple Of Questions, America, But The Answer Can't Be "Appeal 'Strategy.'"

Since Sung Park, Esquire, one of several rampant attorneys at large, and almost the last of many conflicted ones forced on killercop by the Ninth Realm, in the Land Of Koz, is now currently employed by Homeland Security, since he QUIT the day of the appeal, in the parking lot as he emptied his trunk of case files into the back of my car Think about that one for a moment.

 

He knew Killercop adamantly denied "transmitting," so why the blatant lie to go along with the words the Wizard was spoon feeding him?

 

So he just flew away and vanished...

 

Sung knew for a fact that Killercop never would, or did, admit transmitting anything against the law; and nor did the government ever prove he did transmit anything against the law.

 

So, again, why would he falsely confess that killercop was guilty of transmitting anything illegal when he knew the government had no proof?

 

Or why would the Ninth Circus Perv, force-feed him more lies, and he admit to those spoon-fed lies, knowing they were lies he could never prove. Moreover, he was so confused he even got a hint of a backbone and said: this. He certainly knew the legal standard for the burden of the proof. Hell, one judge even spelled it out for him.

 

Here are some choices:

• Because neither parties knew anything about the Internet?

• Because the government knew they had no proof?

• He was offered a sweetheart deal in Homeland Security, when he went along with the conflict and threw the case on purpose.

• He knew this guy might cover up for him, the way this judge is covering up.

Examine some of the players, then play connect the dots...

You might find violations of the rights under the Bill, euphemistically labeled technical errors. Those are now sometimes called "entitlements."

 

That way, a technical error of an entitlement is not the same as a flagrant violation of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution they swore to uphold, protect and defend.

Look Mac, it's complex. Okay? So walk away and mind your own business. Or I unleash the Goblin.

 

Speaking of which, "Did you know the original penny in America had the motto: "Mind Your Own Business"

Contact | © Copyright 1998-2010 Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.