Ain't nothin' here. Y'all best be movin' on, compadre.

 

 

"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up ... [big time."] ~Judge A. Howard Matz

FACIALLY LAWFUL SINCE 1998

MAYDAY IN AMERICA! SECRET THINGS CRIME SCENE NUTS AND EXTREMISTS
c

A mighty oak tree was once a nut that stood its ground

"A mighty oak tree was once a nut that stood its ground"

"It's going to trial and there's no way around that - the truth has to come out." ~Police Officer Adrian Schoolcraft

 


The Case of the Misconduct of the Psychological Examiner.

 

Office of Internal Affairs

 

The basis for the first ground of Petitioner's motion is the recent finding by the Office of Internal Affairs of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons that the psychiatrist who evaluated Petitioner prior to his guilty plea, Dr. Thomas Patenaude, falsified the records of four federal inmates "to make it appear he met with inmates when in fact he had not."

 

FOUR??? BETTER MAKE IT FIVE!!

 

 

PRESUMED GUILTY

 

From the time Killercop entered the federal prison system, first in Devens, Mass., he was subjected to "conditions of psychological and physical torture," including months of confinement for "non-disciplinary reasons."

 

aaaaah Nutz!

aaaaah Nutz!

A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when the evidence in the record supports the finding but ‘the reviewing court is left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’ ” Burlington N., Inc. v. Weyerhaeuser, 719 F.2d 304, 307 (9th Cir. 1983)

 

A MISTAKE???

 

HOW ABOUT A "TECHNICAL" ERROR?

 

A FUN-DA"MENTAL" ONE AT THAT!

 

lightenment

YET ANOTHER FUN-DA- "MENTAL" RIGHT, LOST TO THE RULE OF "JUST 'CAUSE I SAY SO!"

 

SECRET MOTION PLACED IN FILE NOT USED.

 

HOW ABOUT WHEN the evidence in the record DOESN'T support the finding...LETS START FROM THERE!

LET'S CONSULT AN EXPERT. BUT NOT ONE FROM CALIFORNIA!

 

AND NOW THE MARSHALS CAN'T BE TRUSTED TO SERVE MY PAPERWORK. JUST 'CAUSE OF HIZZZZ ODOR'S CORRUPTION.

 

Should You Be Able To Video Police?

AND WHAT IS UP WITH DARCY?


SIDE BAR DISCUSSION

A. Competency Standard
The standard for determining competency is well established through United States Supreme Court case law.

Federal courts have acknowledged that the Due Process Clause of “[t]he Constitution forbids the trial of a defendant who lacks mental competency.” United States v. DeShazer, 554 F.3d 1281, 1285 (10th Cir. 2009).

Accordingly, the United States Supreme Court set forth a standard for determining competency in Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960), which requires a defendant to have (1) a rational and factual understanding of the proceedings and (2) the ability to consult with counsel with a reasonable degree of rational understanding. Id.

More recently, the Supreme Court has recognized that requiring a criminal defendant to “be competent has a modest aim: It seeks to ensure that he has the capacity to understand the proceedings and to assist counsel.” Godinez v. Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 402 (1993).

Hey check this out!

Federal Judge Matz doesn't care. But that is just my opinion. And my opinion is based on facts, not on fiction. And that's a fact. This is what fiction looks like. Or is it? Around here, anything is possible.

BUT THIS IS REALITY

That is what happens when medical treatments and examinations are not conducted, when the government claims it is entrusted with it's care.

Think about that awhile before you go vote for your forced health-care.

You can't force people

You can't force people to care. Or to pay for someone else's care. They care or they don't care.

If you do force, it is just another form of slavery. Like a captive audience.

Enlightenment

Don't Let Your Worries Get The Best Of You, Remember, Moses Started Out As A Basket Case!

 

FACTS:

Dr. Who never "treats" or even examines me.

 

FACT:

Nor does the Director of the facility ever send the Certificate, required by the law, when he sends me back to California, after finally learning about the secret hearing from me, directly in his office. More on that later.

 

FACT:

March of 2003 rolls around. Killercop arrives back for another hearing and informs everyone of the facts above at the next hearing. The judge, of course, covers this fact up and ignores the reality that Dr.Who didn't treat the accused, or even examine him, but in fact had made up the report, just like he had made up these other reports. "Doctored Reports:" 1 2 3

 

FACT:

Even the Warden from the Nut House chimes in on the issue, supporting my statements above.

 

FACT:

Matz covers this up and everyone else involved then forgot the oh so "vital" certificate required by the law. Well, more like ignored it. Another mistake? Or willful, knowingly and with specific intent to deprive human rights, under color of the law.

FACT:

 

It would be prudent to look further into the facts.

 

 

Lynching Job On KC

1. Standard. In order to find a defendant competent, a court must find by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding and that he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him. Dusky v. U.S., 362 U.S. 402 (1960).

This standard is stated slightly differently in 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d).

 

Under the current federal statute, a defendant is incompetent if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she “is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him or to assist properly in his defense.” See also, Incompetency to Stand Trial, 81 Harv. L. Rev. 454 (1967); Indiana v. Edwards, ___ U.S. ___ , 128 S.Ct. 2379 (2008).

In Cooper v. Oklahoma, 116 S 3 .Ct. 1373 (1996), the Supreme Court determined that it would violate due process to require a defendant to prove incompetence by clear and convincing evidence. The appropriate Constitutional standard is ‘preponderance of the evidence’.

The Department of Justice Manual 9-9.110 recommends that the initial competency evaluation be done locally, citing In re Newchurch, 807 F.2d 404 (5th Cir. 1986). In Killercop's case he was sent to the opposite side of the United States of America.

Commitments after a judicial finding of incompetency.

A. Upon a judicial determination of reasonable cause to believe the defendant is incompetent, the court may order a 30 day in-patient examination under 18 U.S.C. §4241(b) and 18 U.S.C. §4247(b). The court cannot begin with a four month commitment under §4241(d) without this intermediary step. U.S. v. White, 887 F.2d 705, 710 (6th Cir. 1989).

Due Process Cloth

The four month commitment requires a finding of incompetency.

b. Once a court has determined, after a [secret] hearing, that a defendant is incompetent, 18 U.S.C. §4241(d) provides for a temporary commitment. The section permits custody and treatment for up to four months.

A court cannot have a hearing, to make a "present" finding, if the accused is "presently" being treated.

Only in the land of K-Oz. Where anything is possible.

18 U.S.C. § 4241(d), which permits custodial treatment "for such a reasonable period of time, not to exceed four months, as is necessary to determine whether there is a substantial probability that in the foreseeable future he will attain the capacity to permit the trial to proceed." 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d)(1),

SO JUDGES AND US ATTORNEYS ARE STUPID??

4241(d) IT IS NOT, I REPEAT, NOT FOR AN EVALUATION. GET IT?

IT"S NOT "PRETTY CLEAR," IT'S CRYSTAL CLEAR.

ELENA AND DEBRA BOTH KNEW. IT IS FOR TREATMENT. PERIOD. EVEN IF MATZ PLAYED STUPID.

PLACED IN FILE. USED.

KEYWORDS: FRAUD

 

BEAN LADEN

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THE$E COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

The Trial of Judge A.Howard Matz

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

TORTURED COVER UP

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2012. At least that's my intent! 'Till then...

ANOTHER PERSONPERSON OF ANOTHER

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

CROOKED COPS ON THE RUN

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and the easily frightened children!

THE END.

The Case Of The Forced Incompetent Game.

Poke The Incompetent

IN THIS GAME, FIRST THEY REMOVE YOU. THEN THEY MAGICALLY "RESTORE" YOU, FORCIBLY BY TORTURE TESTS! AND FORCIBLY BY DRUGS!! BUT FIRST COMES THE "DOCTORED" REPORT.


TYRANTS 101

"I was torn in pieces by the devils that rack the brains of unhappy men. Do God's eyes not reach to the prisons of the Inquisition?" ~Carcel, goldsmith of Seville, a victim of the Spanish Inquisition.

TYRANTS 101

A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE IS IN FACT A WONDERFUL THING!! ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU GET TO HOLD A HEARING WITHOUT THEM!! AND SUBJECT THEM TO "A BATTERY OF TESTS!!" WHICH IS BUT THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT TO "RESTORE" YOU.

THE CASE OF A 4241(D) COMMITMENT TO INJUSTICE.

A.K.A. The doctor is not in, or even all there. A.K.A. Mind-bending content.

Jane and A. Howard Injustice Matz

A.K.A., In a ham and eggs breakfast, the Chicken and the Fox is involved, but the Pig is committed."

THOUGHT CRIME

Okay, I'll play along with the Forced Incompetent game. Even the cops are getting into the swing of the game. O.K., so what's going on? Since you're forcing attorneys on me, what's another Doctor in the big picture? Right? Doc? Hellooooooooo. Anyone there?

SECRET MOTION PLACED IN FILE NOT USED.

Kind of hard to be "present" when you're locked up in a cuckoo's nest. Or even another room, in the dark. Speaking of present, do you understand present. As in the present? Can anyone tell me how to get back my sanity? Law says I need my certified certificate! But it also says this was supposed to be done first, well 'fore any trial. Ignorance of the law says, "tough!"

CRIME SCENE

It also says that a FINDING OF INCOMPETENCY IS A FINDING OF A FACT, and not law! Probably.

SEEK TRUTH

Attorneys for Jared Loughner, accused shooter of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and 18 others, have filed an emergency motion to block federal authorities from forcibly medicating their client with anti-psychotic drugs. The motion, filed Friday in Tucson, Ariz., federal court, argues that the Justice Department is making "an end run" around Mr. Loughner's right to contest such treatment by misusing the rules governing administering such drugs. The U.S. Attorney's office in Phoenix, which is prosecuting the case, didn't request that Mr. Loughner be forcibly medicated and wasn't consulted about it, an official there said. The federal Bureau of Prisons made that decision under authority it has, he said. A Bureau of Prisons spokeswoman declined to comment.

PRETTY PETTY TYRANTS

May I inquire of Your odor whether or not the court is planning to make any "factual findings..." ~Greg Nicolaysen

Shhhhhhhh

 

01.17.2003

 

The U.S. government decides to hold a hearing. present are the prosecutor, the judge and the hand-picked attorney, Greg Nicolaysen, whom the judge decided to force on Killercop.

 

CRAZY IDEA

 

Court Jester

01.17.2003

Nicolaysen: “May I inquire of Your Honor whether or not the court is planning to make any "factual findings" in regard to the "reasonable cause standard" under the stature since there are no findings that have been submitted by the government?”

Judge Matz

Judge Matz: “Reasonable cause standard for the requirements of the competency exam?” Facts?  [Ahhh, Oh yea, shucks, darn near forgot about that thar thingy-ma-bob in the law.]

Court Jester

Nicolaysen: “Yes, Your Honor. Under [Title 18] 4241, Subsection A, as the court very well knows, there’s a reasonable cause requirement.

Judge: “I already did but I will repeat them.

You were not there.

Judge Matz: “Those finding in turn arise out of and refer to and include findings that Killercop has displayed "apparent confusion" about the proper rolls of any counsel and all counsel, at least those counsel who have represented him thus far in this case, vis-à-vis the client and particular vi-a-vis him.

Killercop has displayed some apparent confusion as to the actual charges and what they consist of and what the elements are.”

Hey check this out!

NOTE: This didn't seem to bother Matz when he never insured a “Certificate of Competency” was filed, before conducting hearing on 08.27.03

May I inquire??? F U! Where was my right to inquire??? No T.V? No phones? How about a tin can and a really long stretch of string. Even a kidnapper and murder gets a least that!!

This is total denial of a due process. He knows this, they all knew this, but they committed Treason anyhow by usurping jurisdiction. But don't tell the Chief!! He'll get annoyed. He was busy committing his own treason. Quack Quack!! Ducks? Nope, Quacks! And rabbit holes.

Squeeze slowly

The Ninth Circuit has called insuring a Certificate of Competency is filed a “Vital Responsibility” of the judge’s duties. This means all of them violated U.S. v. Phelps, 283 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2002) Which was "fresh" law.

Judge Matz

Judge Matz also never made the "required" finding that there is a “substantial probability of future competency,” required under Jackson v. Indiana, 406 US 715, 738 (1972). But he did predict that in 2010, we would still be arguing about the rights under the Constitution, he, and everyone else, knew they were violating.

So, he alone made a finding that Killercop should be sent away for mental “treatment,” for "restoration" even though no finding had been made of such fact.

But everyone forgot to invite me to the hearing. Just like his buddy, Alex, made a finding, all by himself, like a God, to deny my lawful appeal.

Hey check this out!
The Judge clearly displayed "apparent confusion" as to the actual charges of incompetence, and what the elements are.

 

Transcript of 04.07.2003
Docket 158
Page 3, Lines 9-10


Court Jester

Defendant’s Counsel: “Gregory Nicolaysen appearing for the defendant, who is not present, Your Lordship, Honor, All Exalted Matzo!” (PDF).

 

Judge Matz: "[a]nd under the applicable provisions of the federal statute involved, 18 U.S.C. 4241(D), I was directing that he be examined in an FMC for the purposes of evaluating that determination. I did not make a finding." Page 4, Lines 24-25, Id.

 


Prosecutor: “[a]nd even though we were aware that the court didn't make the "specific" finding [ ] at the hearing,…”

 

(SHE IS TALKING ABOUT A FACT HERE.)

 

 

THE FACT THAT ALL THREE CONSPIRED TO VIOLATE MY RIGHTS, THEN PUNISHED ME FOR POINTING OUT THAT SPECIFIC FACT. AMONST OTHERS. BUMMER FOR YOU THEN BECAUSE I GOT MORE BAD NEWS. ELENA J. DUARTE LIED TO YOU ABOUT IT.

 

THE U.S. GOVERNMENT IS LYING TO ITSELF, TOO, AS YOU READ THIS>

 

UMMM IT'S TO PROTECT THE "TRUE" PSYCHOPATHS LIKE GARY AND HIS GANG WHOSE CORPORATIONS PLUNDER AMERICA FOR YOUR IDENTITIES. AND TO HOUSE YOUR CHILDREN IN THEIR PRISONS AND CORPORATIONS. AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

 

ONLY NOW YOU GET A PRESENT CHANCE TO PLUNDER THEM BACK. TAKE BACK YOUR IDENTITY!! TAKE IT BACK FROM THEM. THEY SIMPLY STOLE IT FROM YOU (ALONG WITH YOUR YOUR JOBS, YOUR HOMES, INVESTMENTS AND SAVNGS, ETC!!)

 

I AM SIMPLY GIVING YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE BACK YOUR IDENTITYS THEY STOLE FROM YOU, TIMES 7000 PLUS!


THE SPIRIT OF KILLERCOP

Contempt Of Cop

BAD COPS

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

EVEN THE BRITISH ARE LAUGHING AT YA!!

COWARDS!

 

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Bookmark and Share

Sign my Guestbook

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum