"I just had a procedural point while Mr. Nicolaysen "Was" still up here. A.K.A. The case of I just had "A procedural Point" while Mr. Nicolaysen "Was" still up here." A.K.A. That was "Then" but this is now. Cheater!

Ladies and Gentlemen, this beady-eyed, bushy -faced Detective above, is Chuck Zeglin, of the Los Angeles Police Department. He was in charge of a balls-to-the-walls, "full blown," criminal investigation of this website.*** Yeah, blown, he "blew" it alright.

Charles and his Detective, and other cop, buddies (Sheriffs and, yes, gasp, F.B.I.) all broke the law when they raided and censored this website for it's speech in 1998, and then helped cover-up the raid and crimes committed by other cops documented within this website.

Before they took this site down unlawfully in 1998, we were being visited over one million times a month from guests around the world. Didn't they teach you Detectives that censorship by the government in America is unlawful?

Why Police Censorship Is Outlawed

"The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they try to alter the facts to fit their views."

Docket #188

Page 52, Lines 6-19
Prosecutor: “I just had a procedural point while Mr. Nicolaysen "was" still up here. In terms of the subpoenas, early on in the case, when Mr. Harris was representing Killercop, the court had ordered me [See 01.14.2003] to ensure that Mr. Gary Winnick, who had been subpoenaed by Mr. Harris, was made available.

Mr. Nicolaysen had indicated to me that that availability was no longer necessary or required. So I have indicated that to Mr. Winnick’s attorney, and he is not under "my subpoena" anymore.

I just wanted to make that clear because that was kind of left hanging, and I don’t think there’s any written communication that would be in the file between myself and Mr. Nicolaysen on that point.”

Well, E-lana J. Duarte, he is still under Killercop's subpoena. IT WAS NEVER YOUR SUBPOENA. IT BELONGED TO THE COURT, SINCE IT WAS "a court subpoena." AND YOU ARE NOT THE COURT. I just wanted to make that clear, too, because that was kind of left hanging. How am I hanging? A little to the left. Thanks for asking. BUT BIG THANKS FOR THE ROM.

MY GRADMOTHER SAYS YOU, DEBRA YANG, ALVIN HOWARD MATZ, AND ROBERT BONNER, ALONG WITH ALEX "THE PERVERTED" KOZINSKI, WILL NEVER SILENCE ME.

BUT HEY, I TELL HER, IN A DICTATORSHIP ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE. BUT NOT ALWAYS PRUDENT.

BOTTOM LINE IS THE SAME GOES FOR THE COPS. JUST STOP EATING SO MANY DOUGHNUTS, CHP IN, GIT IT? AND JUST BUY SOME SPEECH. IT"S FOR SALE!! REAL GREAT DEALS! YOU CAN BE A SUCESSFUL TYRANT!

OTHERWISE, HOW IS THE "KINDA HOPING FOR A DIFFERENT ANSWER" THING WORKING OUT FOR YA?

They Crossed The Line.

[Article 1] "Zeglin has taken one gang related site seriously enough to conduct a full investigation: The owners of KillerCop.com, which suggested rewards for people who kill police officers in creative ways, were eventually convinced to take the site down before any potential charges were pressed."

 

[Article 2] "The only intervention to date was with the creators of KillerCop.com, which offered a reward for the most creative way to kill a policeman. It soon disappeared after the LAPD began to talk about charges to incite murder."

 

[Article 3] "One part of the life that has not been seen much online is the crime. Zeglin recalls one Web site, www.killercop.com, that offered rewards for murdering Los Angeles police officers a few years ago. But since the LAPD had that site removed, Zeglin has not seen street gangs doing anything illegal online."

 

[Article 4] "Un seul site a provoqué une enquête de la LAPD: killercop.com, offrant des récompenses aux visiteurs prêts à tuer des policiers de Los Angeles."

 

[Article 5] In court papers filed August 11, League general counsel Enrique Hernandez cites a Web site called "Killercop," which reportedly advocated violence against LAPD officers, offering a "$1,000.05 reward to the first person who kills a cop making an illegal arrest . . . and $2,000.10 if it's an LAPD cop." The Web site was shut down after complaints were lodged by the department, but it re-emerges occasionally.

THIS LAST ONE, BELOW, IS MY FAVORITE, BY CALIFORNIA ASS-EMBLYMEMBER NOREEN EVANS, PICTURED ABOVE.

[Article 6] www.killercop.com - now inoperable - offered a cash reward with no questions asked for the death ... of two LAPD officers.

Chuck, as we watched your appearance recorded on the news above, talking about our site in 2001. We wondered, "If it is so 'hard to tell' if this site is illegal, how come you and your detective buddies shut it down, in an illegal and unlawful raid just a couple of years before in 1998?"

Tell our viewers just how the LAPD "convinced" us to censor ourselves!

Tell our viewers about this"intervention" by the police which resulted in the censorship and unlawful raid.

Tell our readers how the LAPD "had the site removed," before these mysterious "charges" were never pressed. Murdering police?? Pullllllllleeeeeezzzeeeee.

Why didn't you arrest the previous owner? Why didn't you ever tell the Department of State, F.B.I. or the ATF about the "weapons" for sale???

The F.B.I. claims they only found out about the weapons in 2001-2002. Why did your Detective buddies sit on that information and not share it, if indeed you believed it was in fact and deed true, isn't that a crime?

Okay, does anyone in America really believe you can offer "a cash reward with no questions asked for the death ... of two LAPD officers," and not be arrested???

Better question, does anyone really believe the F.B.I. would turn over a federal criminal investigation to Chuck, in a local city police department, and do no follow-ups or pass on any of the serious allegations of federal crimes such as interstate murder, extortion, threats and even selling guns???

Does anyone really believe the F.B.I. never ever conducted any investigation at all?

That's their "official story."

Is someone in the F.B.I. lying?

I would bet on it being this guy!!!

And Chucky, we didn't forget how your White Supremacy Detective buddies lied to the F.B.I. saying that "we are armed, in 2002" So if you all believed that BS in 1998, where was the State Department, F.B.I., Customs Department, A.T.F. and all the other acronyms?

Is there paperwork to back it up like there is supposed to be, filed? You know, the kind required by the law?

We're calling ya out, Black Hat Chuck. You sure got quiet, did you and your detective thugs at the L.A.P.D. pull a rule 25 on us? And by us, and we, I mean me, and the Goblin. I don't quite have a gang or a posse, yet. Maybe Randy will locate you for me. And Doctor Who, too! I got tons of questions. Let me see if he is feeling Randy, or someone else, tonight. But that's a question for another day, right kids?