 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the Tormentor, never the Tormented." -Elie Wiesel At the outset of Killercop's trial, Judge A. Howard Matz was indifferent to the fact that a major metropolitan police departments unlawfully removed this website in an unlawful raid, tortured me, and that the prosecutor was a judge named specifically within killercop.com with an axe to grind, along with the F.B.I. agents, sheriffs and cops, who had sent these emails to Killercop.
Section 245 of Title 18 U.S.C., one of the primary statutes used to combat racial and religious bias-motivated violence was well known to this so-called Federal Criminal Court Judge. He did all within his power of his office to cover up the F.B.I.'s crimes. Even letting this guy lie to him. And this guy hide.
It's the current statute which prohibits intentional interference, by force or threat of force, with the enjoyment of a Federal right or benefit (such as speech or work) on the basis of race, color.
He knows, he wrote the book.
Judge Matz The sun no longer shows his face, and treason sows his secret seeds that no man can detect. Might is right, and justice there is none. —Walther von der Vogelweide
Wouldn't you agree, Alvin, that: “Judges must undertake a careful, balanced evaluation of the nature and strength of both the evidence the defense was prevented from presenting and the evidence each side presented at trial.” Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 435 (1995) Alvin's Reply
"that's not an issue that I have to address and it's not a question I'm required to answer, so I decline to do so."
Folks, correct me if I'm wrong, but that is his function-in-life as a lifetime appointed federal judge, to "settle disputes in the law and answer questions of the law." Right? Then tell me, America, why is he guessing? One sure can't have that service from either other branch of the so-called-government of the people, for the people and by the people. This means no process for a redress. And his good buddy covers it all up. With the fall guy. His was another of the classic disinformationist tactics of the KKK. Treason, too. At the least it's Misprision of felony. We all know ignorance is no excuse. But he won't tell you where his authority lies either. 'Cause it doesn't exist. Just like his Doctor, he didn't exist either.
Like two peas in a pod, Matz and Yang then go skipping off down the yellow brick road, all the while leaving a wake of destruction and secret hearings and cover ups behind them, as the say in the law, in toto. They are off to meet their good buddy and friend, the Wizard Of Koz! A FOREST GUMP STATEMENT “I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges, that have been filed against Killercop that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case. I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all. >So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a d(sic) fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.” ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz "There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up big time." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz
“a heavy burden rests on the government to demonstrate that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his ... right to retained or appointed counsel.” 384 U.S. 436, 475 (1966) BURDEN???????????? HEAVY??????? HAHAHAHAHAHA! GOOD ONE! I'M GOING TO BE "REAL CAREFUL" WITH THIS TERM AND SAY THERE IS "NO" BURDEN ON THIS GOVERNMENT AT ALL HERE. Not just careful...but "real" careful. SAY WHAT? 11.08.2004 (Pgs 8-9) MATZ: "I think you need to be real careful in how you use some of these terms." Mandamus is an “extraordinary remedy” that should be invoked only in “exceptional circumstances.” Will v. United States, 389 U.S. 90, 95 (1967). It is the moving party’s burden to establish “that its right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” Bankers Life & Cas. Co. v. Holland, 346 U.S. 379, 384 (1953) (internal quotation marks omitted). We consider five factors in assessing a mandamus petition:
(2) whether petitioner will be damaged or prejudiced in any way not correctable on appeal; (3) whether the district court’s order is clearly erroneous as a matter of law; (4) whether the district court’s order is an oft-repeated error or manifests a persistent disregard of the federal rules; and (5) whether the district court’s order raises new and important problems or issues of first impression. Bauman v. United States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654-55 (9th Cir. 1977). MATZ LINE OF THE TRIAL, IN NAME ONLY: Transcript of 12.04.2002, Page 6, Lines 8-12 “The fact is that Killercop used not only entirely different language but was in a situation, was perceived to be in a situation, was none at the time of the indictment to be in a situation that there was no information suggesting Schmoe, whoever that is, was in.” In a Federal court hearing an appeal, it is the duty of the judges to be certain of their jurisdiction. They have a legal duty to inspect the record of the District trial court, sua sponte, to determine whether the District trial court held jurisdiction at all times, if a Constitutional Right was violated, and/or if any officer of the court, whether judge or attorney, engaged in a "fraud upon the court". "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
Judge A. Howard Matz "THE LAW IS 'PRETTY CLEAR,' AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 CASE FILE: US v KILLERCOP.COM
“My belief has always been . . . that wherever in this land any individual's fundamental constitutional rights are being denied, it is the obligation of the federal government -- at point of bayonet if necessary -- to restore that individual's constitutional rights.” ~ President Ronald Reagan
"You have a right to a lawyer who provides effective assistance of counsel. That's a constitutional right you have. That doesn't mean that you have a right to have a lawyer. You or anyone has a right to have a lawyer do whatever you think should be done or not to do things that you don't want to be done."- AUGUST 22, 2002, pg 12. Judge Alvin Howard Matz was the U.S. district court judge who lorded over the trial of Killercop. The case was originally assigned to another court, but quickly given to his court thereafter. This is known as the "Fast Shuffle." A sort of legal re-shuffling of the deck, to re-stack it. They did the same "Fast Shuffle" at the end to get the Wizard Of Koz to hear the appeal, so the Wiz could cover it up.
He's a freaking computer genius, too! Like a tyrant, judge Matz denied even the most basic, American, fundamental rights during the pretrial and trial, such as a right to a speedy trial, due process, effective assistance of the counsel and the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation, which is criminal at least, treason at worst.
Due Process was a memory. Matz and Yang believe all of the preceeding words are mere entitlements they could bestow on me, or deny. I know my rights come from the God. Not him. But this guy that they forced on me hates Christians. His words, not mine. HE HATES CHRISTIANS AND BLACK-AMERICANS?
SAY WHAT? Judge A. Howard Matz: “It’s consistent with what you say, Ms. Potashner because it looks like the LAPD was successful in having the Killercop website removed from the host site. Is that correct?” Public Defender Potashner: “I believe so, yes.” Prosecutor: “I believe that’s correct, Your Honor. ”
SAY WHAT, AGAIN? GOBLINS IN THE COURTROOM!! OH MY! Judge A. Howard Matz: "There seems to be a goblin surrounding this case."
SAY WHAT, SOME MORE? "THE LAW IS PRETTY CLEAR, AND I DID NOT FOLLOW IT." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz, 09.26.2003 Case# 02-350(A) AHM, Page 61, Line 24
HUH? Judge: “Now, I don’t think it is inappropriate for the record to note that I’ve previously authorized experts, or at least one expert, I didn’t go back and check the file but at least one expert, and I think could have been more then one somebody with specific skill and advanced skill in computer technology as well as to be appointed to represent or assist prior counsel. Have you seen any expert reports?” Reed: “No. Not at all, Your Honor.” Judge: “Has anybody discussed with you any of Killercop’s prior lawyers, any expert reports that may have been generated?” Reed: “No, Your Honor.”
SAY WHAT? "If there were a crime, that consisted of arrogance, I would depart upward to sentence you to a much longer [illegal] sentence."
Here is why he imposed the illegal sentence...for speech and various thought crimes, on recommendation of the probation department in their pre-sentence report. They were able to hide this from me until after I was sentenced. To keep my reply off the record, had I seen it first.
Can you guess why Debra Yang and Greg Nicolaysen were treated like royalty by Lord A. Howard Matz and forgiven by Lord Kozinski? Here is a big hint for all you detectives, from the Board Of Governors. You used to be able to find the file above here until we exposed it, then it disappeared. A classic approach and a known disinformation tactic.
SAY WHAT? 07.19.2007 L. A. District Judge A. Howard Matz raised a more abstract concern when he said that using BlackBerry's inhibited his efforts to “preserve something akin to the majesty of the law.”
WELL YOUR MAJESTY... Matz is very busy playing with his jurisdiction and trying to discredit as many of his friends enemies as humanly possible.
Did we mention he changs the law to fit his lies? Just one of many. He is so blatent he even admits it in open court. And worse!
Or else he just makes stuff up! But that is implicit, of course. With friends like this, who needs enemies!
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
![a much longer [illegal] sentence."](../../images/oldsite/sentence-illegal.jpg){kind=link}
