The Ninth Circuit has called insuring a Certificate of Competency is filed a “Vital Responsibility” of the judge’s duties. This violated U.S. v. Phelps, 283 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2002)
Judge Matz never made the "required" finding that there is a “substantial probability of future competency,” required under Jackson v. Indiana, 406 US 715, 738 (1972).
So, Matz alone made a finding that Killercop should be sent away for mental “treatment,” for "restoration" even though no finding had been made of such fact and more importanly, under the law. Known simply as a "'resonalbly cause' standard."
But everyone forgot to invite me to the hearing. Just like his buddy, Alex, made a finding, all by himself, like a God, to deny my lawful appeal.

Transcript of 04.07.2003
Docket 158
Page 3, Lines 9-10
Counsel: “Gregory Nicolaysen appearing for the defendant, who is not present, Your Lordship, Honor, All Exalted Matzo!”
Judge Matz: "[a]nd under the applicable provisions of the federal statute involved, 18 U.S.C. 4241(D), I was directing that he be examined in an FMC for the purposes of evaluating that determination. I did not make a finding." Page 4,
Lines 24-25, Id.
Prosecutor:
“[a]nd even though we were aware that the court didn't make the "specific" finding at the hearing,…”
(SHE IS TALKING ABOUT A FACT HERE.)
SEE ALSO 18 U.S.C. 4241 CERTIFICATE OF RESTORATION MISSING - ON PURPOSE.
SEE ALSO VITAL
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS
WSJ
NY TIMES HIT PIECE
FOX NEWS HIT PIECE
NBC NEWS HIT PIECE
2023 HIT LIST
(c)1997-2023
All Rights Reserved.
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
TYRANTS 101
Mind-bending content.
A.K.A. The doctor is not in, or even all there.

A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE IS IN FACT A WONDERFUL THING!! ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU GIT TO HOLD A HEARING WITHOUT THEM!! AND SUBJECT THEM TO "A BATTERY OF TESTS!!" WHICH IS BUT THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT TO "RESTORE" YOU.
The Case Of The Forced Incompetent Game.

IN THIS GAME, FIRST THEY REMOVE YOU. THEN THEY "RESTORE" YOU, FORCIBLY BY TORTURE AND FORCIBLY BY DRUGS!! BUT FIRST COMES THE "DOCTORED" REPORT.
THE CASE OF A 4241(D) COMMITMENT TO JUSTICE.

Okay, I'll play along with the Forced Incompetent game. O.K., so what's going on?
Since you're forcing attorneys on me, what's another Doctor in the big picture? Right? Doc? Hellooooooooo. Anyone there?
Kind of hard to be "present" when you're locked up in a cuckoo's nest. Or even another room, in the dark.
Speaking of present, do you understand present. As in the present?
Can anyone tell me how to get back my sanity? Law says I need my certified certificate!
But it also says this was supposed to be done first, well 'fore any trial. That is called the rule of law and having standards.
It also says that a FINDING OF INCOMPETENCY IS A FINDING OF A FACT, and not law!
Probably.

01.17.2003
The U.S. government decides to hold a hearing. Present are the prosecutor, the judge and the hand-picked attorney, Greg Nicolaysen, whom the judge decided to force on Killercop.
A CRAZY IDEA

01.17.2003
Nicolaysen: “May I inquire of Your Honor whether or not the court is planning to make any "factual findings" in regard to the reasonable cause standard" under the statute, since there are no findings that have been submitted by the government?”

Judge Matz: “Reasonable cause standard for the requirements of the competency exam?”
Facts?
[Ahhh, Oh yea, shucks, darn near forgot about that thar thingy-ma-bob in the law.]

Nicolaysen: “Yes, Your Honor. Under [Title 18] 4241, Subsection A, as the court very well knows, there’s a reasonable cause requirement.”

Judge: “I already did but I will repeat them.
You were not there.”
Judge Matz: “Those finding in turn arise out of and refer to and include findings that Killercop has displayed "apparent confusion" about the proper rolls of any counsel and all counsel, at least those counsel who have represented him thus far in this [complex computer] case, vis-à-vis the client and particular vi-a-vis him. Killercop has displayed some apparent confusion as to the actual charges and what they consist of and what the elements are.”
NOTE: This didn't seem to bother Matz when he never insured a vital and REQUIRED “Certificate of Competency” was filed, before conducting hearing on 08.27.03
May I inquire???
F U! Where was my right to inquire???
No T.V?
No phones?
How about a tin can and a really long stretch of string.
Even a kidnapper and murder gets a least that!!
This is total denial of a due process. He knows this, they all knew this, but they committed Treason anyhow by usurping jurisdiction. But don't tell the Chief!! He'll get annoyed. He was busy committing his own treason.
A FLAPDOODLE
FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

TWITTER
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.


MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.
LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.
|  |