 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"Before he was sentenced - the Federal Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) sent a letter to the district judge informing him that an internal investigation of Dr. Patenaude revealed “sufficient evidence to question the credibility and accuracy of a psychological evaluation.”
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
Warden David L. Winn: An Honorable Man Of Integrity. I will never forget Warden David L. Winn After being held unlawfully, for many months at his Federal Medical Center in Devens, Massachusetts; ironically it used to be an Air Force Base where my Dad was stationed when I was a child, I finally obtained a copy of the secret hearing leading up to my sudden need for "mental treatment" under 18 U.S.C. 4241(D)as in DOG. Seeing as I had refused to cooperate with everyone's illegal plans up to this point in time, I marched down to his office and informed him I had refused to participate in the charade and had rejected all contact/treatment, since arrival, with Dr. Patenaude, A.K.A. Dr. Who? I then informed the Warden about the attorney forced on me by judge Matz, the selective prosecution by attorney Debra Yang and about the secret hearing. I stated I will be exposing them, and his participation in the events thereafter, however I said I had no wish to include him as he was never notified until now, as well. If he wished to let me go, forthwith, I would turn the other cheek, so to speak. He was the smartest guy in the place. I was on an airplane, the next morning, back to the corrupted courts of Yang, Matz and Kozinski for some more selective prosecution. The warden did some digging around about Dr. Patenaude after I left, on account the Warden was getting lies from the Dr., pretending he was "treating" me. So he notified the parties involved in the secret hearing of his findings after I left. The law required this Warden to "sign" under penalty of perjury, mind you, a Certificate of Restoration. It is REQUIRED by the law before any further hearings or trial can commence. This Warden is not stupid, he wasn't getting involved with lies and deprivations of rights under color of law. He wasn't signing any Certificate after hearing my story. He must have thought to himself, that Certificate is their issue, not mine. He had honor. 18 U.S.C. 4241(e) Discharge.— THEN: AFTER NOT BEFORE! The court shall [then] hold a hearing, conducted pursuant to the provisions of section 4247(d), to determine the competency of the defendant. If, after the hearing, the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant has recovered to such an extent that he is able to understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him and to assist properly in his defense, the court shall order his immediate discharge from the facility in which he is hospitalized and shall set the date for trial or other proceedings.
The law clearly says you set the date for the trial, or other proceedings 'AFTER' the Certificate. Not BEFORE.
Yet nobody involved in the secret hearing follwed the law, again, and proceeded onward with the persecution.
Footnote: Based on my exposing to the Warden that the Dr. NEVER treated or examined me, he was investigated by the Warden, who discoved he was pretending to treat other inmates, too and was ARRESTED and removed.
MY OPINION IS EVERYBODY INVOLVED IN THE ABOVE SECRET HEARING SHOULD BE ARRESTED, THEN HUNG OR SHOT FOR TREASON.
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
