|
"Being in a minority, even in a minority of one, did not make you mad. There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad." -G. Orwell 1984
A.K.A. THE CASE OF "LET'S CONSPIRE TO GASLIGHT HIM, IN A HYBRED AND SECRET HEARING."
"Now -- but then, again, that is just kind of a side opinion. "I didn't evaluate" for that with him. "I didn't specifically speak to him" about that." ~{Dr.] Thomas Patanaude, Trial Of Killercop.com, Incompetence Hearing, Sept. 27, 2003
Misconduct of the Psychological Examiner
The basis for the first ground is the recent finding by the Office of Internal Affairs of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons that the psychiatrist who evaluated Petitioner prior to his guilty plea, Dr. Thomas Patenaude, falsified the records of four federal inmates "to make it appear he met with inmates when in fact he had not."
See 2003 8 27.
Matz knew.
And covered this up.
Which is why they ignored the request and motion for the Certificate required by the law.
They had a LOT to hide!
"I think that his outbursts serve a number of different purposes. One is to, obviously, let the court know his dissatisfaction over what's going on. I also think that it's a part of his way of necessarily taking kind of an offensive
maneuver -- excuse me -- in delaying things.
Now -- but then, again, that is just kind of a side opinion. I didn't evaluate for that with him. I didn't specifically speak to him about that. "~[Dr.] Thomas Patanaude, Pre Trial Of Killercop, Competence Hearing, Sept. 27, 2003, Los Angeles Federal District Courthouse. California.
He means he didn't speak to killercop at all. He's making it all up! Of course that is my side opinion. "I didn't evaluate for that with him. I didn't specifically speak to him about that." Hahahahahahahaha!!!!
Anything else you want to tell my readers about what you didn't talk about?
Try telling the truth, such as, "I didn't evaluate him period. And moreover I didn't specifically speak to him."
Speaking of which, anyone seen the vital Certificate required by the Law? It's missing, like the Doctor. And that's a fact!
BEING FRIENDS WITH A GOD, MATZ COULD PREDICT THE FUTURE>>>>
"And in the year 2024 we're still trying to figure out if you've got a lawyer that's going to be okay for you the way you see it. That's not going to happen because at some point I have the power and "the obligation" to find that you have waived your right to have a lawyer represent you. And then you're going to trial on your own. But either way, you're going to trial! " ~Judge A Howard Matz, 01.14.2003 Pretrial of Killercop.
SEE PRUDENT:
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA
REASONABLE DOUBT
"Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless.
Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act." ― Dietrich Bonhoeffer
(c) 1995-2026
All Rights Reserved |
A CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, ORDERED IN A SECRET COURT BY THE JUDGE, THE PROSECUTOR AND A "DEFENSE" ATTORNEY, FORCED ON THE ACCUSED, BEFORE THE JUDGE ADMITS THE LAW WAS ONLY PRETTY CLEAR AND HE DID NOT FOLLOW IT [YEAH, HE BROKE IT].
FACTS:
They all stated I needed 4 months of involuntary mental "treatement," without an examination first!!!
Because if they said I need a mental "examination" first, before a mental "treatment," as the law required, the law would only allow them to hold me for 1 month, not four, without any assistance of counsel. But the plan was to deny the right to a speedy trial, in the "interests and ends of justice," of course.
LAW:
Involuntary hospitalization for mental-
health treatment “constitutes a significant deprivation of liberty.”
-Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 425 (1979).
So “due process requires that the nature and duration of commitment bear some reasonable relation to the purpose for which the individual is committed.” Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 738 (1972).
SPEECH IS CONDUCT. A.K.A. THE CASE OF "TREASON, THE PLACE WHERE YOUR MIND JUST STOPS WORKING."
The Case Of A Sham Of A Sham. With Supporting Conduct! The Indictment Of The Spirit of Killercop.
We've got an indigent accused, improperly committed to a mental institution, impugning the credibility of the psychologist [who never examined or treated Killercop ]to determine Killercop's
competency to both represent himself and to stand trial, on August 27, 2003.
Aside from the issue that the attorney for the defense(sic) was "forced" over and on the accused by the judge, under no authority. Who then participated in a secret hearing. The Judge in this case, A. Howard Matz, was to later that year learn, in a personal letter from the Warden, that the defendant's accusations on August 27, 2003 were true. But A. Howard Matz and Elena J. Duarte, et al, would move forward with the trial, due process and the law be damed, regardless!
Transcript of 01.14.2003
Judge Matz: “That's(sic) means you're going to have to undergo a trial…This is going to happen, no matter what.”
Judge Matz: “But either way, you're going to trial…I would never accept a guilty plea.”
Judge A. Howard Matz failed to report the knowledge of the crime, since he knew the accusations against the Doctor, made in his open court were "most likely" true, and would cause him to lose personal and subject matter jurisdiction.
He was going forward, illegally, and unlawfully, with this trial!
So he sat on the knowledge of the Doctor's crime. In secret. He likes secrets.
In fact, time proved the words of August 27, 2003 to be all too true, and the Doctor quickly and quietly disappeared.
Which explains the mysterious missing certificate, that both the law require[d] and justice demands be produced, in an impartial district, wherein the crime was committed. But that never happened either because of the cover up. And because Matz hid the experts, too.
Notwithstanding the loss of the right to the effective assistance of counsel, and equal right to dispense with it. Or due process. Or even due process. It gets worse... in case you are confused, once the U.S. Corporate attorneys selectively come after you. But that's because in their eyes, I am just...
So they lynched me.
But they never proved I transmitted anything, no matter what their hired guns say in violation of the law under the Sixth Amendment right to NOT PLEAD GUILTY. See also McCoy v. Louisiana, 584 U.S. 414, 417 (2018)
Which is especially telling after being told by the court it would never, ever accept a guilty plea.
This is what happens when the FPD quit and recused their entire district. An #unspoken #conflict that resulted in a false and fraudulent confession...on appeal, by a conflicted public pretender, paid to confess.
Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)
CONTACT
COLLECT A BOUNTY
COLLECT A REWARD
FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE
(c) 1995-2026
All Rights Reserved
|  |
