 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME AGAIN! The drunk is crawling around on all fours under a lamppost one night. A policeman comes along and asks him his business and the drunk decides to explain that he's looking for a lost quarter. The policeman offers to help and “[An] attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client.” A Citizen who let's another "re-present" him, instead of "assist" him is a bigger fool."
[The Computer Expert, Not!] SAY WHAT? William Harris: Public Defenders Office, Los Angeles, California, Central District. "This is a computer case where counsel for Killercop is like a child learning the scales and Killercop is playing Beethoven piano sonatas. It's like if he spoke -- if it was in Chinese and he spoke Chinese and I didn't. "In a [complex] computer case where you’ve got all sorts of computer evidence coupled with the problem that the client has technical expertise that the lawyer doesn't, it just compounds the issue." ~WILLIAM HARRIS
"I don't mean to minimize what I think you're telling me because I'm in the same boat as you, >but I construed you to tell me that you need some kind of tutelage about the niceties of computer technology and Internet usage..." ~JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ, in reply to WILLIAM "WILD BILL" HARRIS, of the Los Angeles, California, Public Defenders Office.
ANYONE SEEN MY NICETIES? I HAD THEM BEFORE I ENTERED THIS MAD COURT. MAYBE THE GOBLIN ATE THEM, ALONG WITH THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW? THIS IS ALL TOO COMPLEX FOR ME. TOOTALOO!! I MEAN, TUTELAGE!! LIKE THE BLIND LEADING THE BLIND!!
A.K.A. Forced to sacrifice one constitutionally protected right, solely because another is respected. Page 5, Lines 1-2 Killercop: “>I will stand on my paperwork.”
Even if present counsel is competent, a serious breakdown in communications can result in an inadequate defense. United States v. Musa, 220 F.3d 1096, 1102 (9th Cir. 2000). Similarly, even if a defendant is denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he is "forced into a trial with the assistance of a particular lawyer with whom he [is] dissatisfied, with whom he[will] not cooperate, and with whom he [will] not, in any manner whatsoever, communicate." Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970).
A. Factors to be considered in ruling upon a motion for appointment of new counsel. In reviewing a district
court's denial of a motion for appointment of new (1) the timeliness of the motion, (3) the extent of the conflict.
The only "inquiry," other then above, came in the form of a secret one. See Judge Howard Matz sees the law as his own personal tool. He doesn't "protect the rights," under the Constitution, he believes he owns them, he bestows them, like gifts, to whom only he chooses. Like a god. QUOTES OF JUDGE MATZ: "In fact, you'll be given the right." BUT NOT THE CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW.
Given? The right I, and millions of other Americans, already own by birthright? Your oath is not to give, but to protect those rights. Without appearence of bias or bafflement. Sounds like you are describing an entitlement. And a dictatorship. That allows for selective application of laws and rules and deniail of rights. Both are unlawful. And dishonorable. Remember how you forced and imposed Greg Nicolaysen on me, ohhh the "agony" he shall soon suffer!
As you just witnessed, color of law also allows for some very, very creative excuses. Some stupid. But, stupid is as stupid does. That's called conduct and intent. I suggest you promply read the law, Sir.
Judge Matz says in federal criminal cases, Rule 51(b) instructs parties how to preserve claims of error: “by informing the court—when [a] ruling … is made or sought—of the action the party wishes the court to take, or the party’s objection to the court’s action and the grounds for that objection.” A party’s failure to preserve a claim ordinarily prevents him from raising it on appeal, but Rule 52(b) recognizes a limited exception for plain errors. “Plain-error review” involves four prongs: (1) there must be an error or defect that the appellant has not affirmatively waived United States v. Olano, 507 U. S. 725 ; (2) it must be clear or obvious, see id., at 734; (3) it must have affected the appellant’s substantial rights, i.e., “affected the outcome of the district court proceedings,” ibid.; and (4) if the three other prongs are satisfied, the court of appeals has the discretion to remedy the error if it “ ‘seriously affect[s] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings,’ ” id., at 736.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
THE KILLERCOP.COM STOLEN FILES. A.K.A. The adequacy of the court's inquiry BOP ME ONCE THEN BOP ME TWICE. BIG BROTHER WAS WATCHING, BUT NOT HARD ENOUGH!! WHILE KILLERCOP WAS IMPRISONED, THESE FILES WERE LOST BY THE PUBLIC PRETENDER AFTER SOMEONE STOLE THEM ENROUTE, WITHIN THE B.O.P THEN THE LOCAL ATTORNEY NAMED A. RODELL, WITHIN THE B.O.P, TRIED TO GET ME TO BREAK THE LAW BY ANTE-DATING A DOCUMENT. SERIOUSLY. OR THE HARD-DRIVES. JUDGE HOWARD MATZ WILL GET BAFFLED AND DISTURBED AGAIN!! SEE: A.K.A. THE COMPUTER EXPERT. A.K.A. THE MISSING MAC SEE ALSO THE WORTHLESS FILE SEE ALSO THE MISSING EXPERTS SEE ALSO THE MISSING DOCTOR SEE ALSO THE MISSING ACCUSED SEE ALSO THE MISSING CERTIFICATE REQUIRED BY THE LAW. SEE ALSO THE MISSING SIXTH AMENDMENT. DO SO PROMPTLY.
WATCH AN ACT OF "AGONY," OVER, AND AFTER, THE FACT.
BUT THEY STILL IGNORED IT, THEN BROKE THE LAW, AND VIOLATED DUE PROCESS, WILLFULLY AND WITH SPECIFIC INTENT. YOU LIKE AGONY? Procedural Unconscionability A determination of whether a contract is procedurally unconscionable focuses on two factors: oppression and surprise. "`Oppression' arises from an inequality of bargaining power which results in no real negotiation and an absence of meaningful choice. `Surprise' involves the extent to which the supposedly agreed-upon terms of the bargain are hidden in the prolix printed form drafted by the party seeking to enforce the disputed terms." Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc., 51 Cal.App.4th 1519, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 138, 145 (Ct.App.1997).
"AT THIS POINT YOU HAVE ONE CHOICE, MEANING THERE ARE TWO THINGS YOU CAN CHOOSE." Page 22, Lines 3-6 Saavedra: “Excuse me, Your Honor, he is correct. They did send him a 100-Megabyte ZIP. Now, stating that his are 250, he is correct. He won’t read it." Judge: “How long have you known that the Zip disk has not been usable by Killercop?” Saavedra: “When he told me that a couple of weeks ago. He didn't even have a ZIP disk. And of the evidence that I was sent in to MDC, there was not one ZIP disk anywhere.”
A.K.A. ANOTHER SAD STORY OF A PERVERTED COVER-UP AND OBSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE. A PRETTY GOOD SYSTEM!! THE COURT: Let the record reflect that there is nothing on this document that contains any Internet Protocol -- IP -- address information. It does show that there was a contact with Network Solutions.
If you want to find out whether they got the precise IP address that you gave on the record a few questions ago, you KILLERCOP: Your Honor -- THE COURT: Please move on!! KILLERCOP: Respectfully, Your Honor, and I mean very respectfully, I would point the Court's attention to No. 7 on this document and No. 8 that we are looking at and direct the Court's attention to 24.160.57.210. THE COURT: I am incorrect. You are correct.
This page is dedicated to my late Dad, Arnold Sutcliffe. Retired, U.S. Air Force, who passed away in 2009. Dad taught me to answer to only one authority, save God, and that is the small, still voice inside my heart.
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
