2) I THINK IT'S QUITE CLEAR, FROM BOTH THE TRANSCRIPT AND THE ORDER, THAT THE COURT WAS NOT SAYING THAT THEY'RE 1 ASSUMING THAT, YOU KNOW, IT'S THE WORST CASE SCENARIO ... APRIL 12, 2002, pg 39
3) MS. DUARTE: BUT CERTAINLY, YOUR HONOR, THAT IS NOT PART OF THE 875(C), AND I KNOW THE COURT'S NOT SAYING IT IS... APRIL 12, 2002, pg 60
4) COURT: Just take that into account. I'mnot saying at all what my ruling would be if the matter of bail comes back to me. And I'm not saying what, whether they should appeal that or move for reconsideration. AUGUST 22, 2002, pg 31
6) COURT: Not much because I'm just assuming the Government will be ready to go on December 3.
MS. DUARTE: That's fine with the Government
THE COURT: If we have to change that, it won't be something that I'm going to be pleased about. MS. DUARTE: No, Your Honor. We're ready to go on the 3rd. THE COURT: I'm not saying you weren't. SEPTEMBER 23, 2002, pg 32
7) THE COURT: YOU KNOW, DR. BACKER, I UNDERSTAND IT'S INHERENT IN THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN A COURTROOM SETTING AND EITHER AN EXAMINATION OR THERAPEUTIC SETTING, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME, THAT THE INQUIRIES THAT ARE THE ISSUE OF TRYING TO DETERMINE IN A FAIR FASHION CONSISTENT WITH THE LEGAL STANDARDS, WHETHER SOMEONE IS COMPETENT, INHERENTLY, ARE DEFICIENT, BECAUSE THEY DON'T PROVIDE THE EXPERT WITH THE CONTEXT AND THE FORM IN WHICH TO MAKE THE MOST CONSIDERED EVALUATION; WOULD YOU AGREE WITH THAT? I'M NOT SAYING THERE'S MUCH WE CAN DO ABOUT IT. WE'RE DOING IT PROCEDURALY THE WAY WE'RE EXPECTED AND AUTHORIZED TO DO, BUT DON'T YOU THINK THIS PROCEDURE IS FLAWED?
WITNESS: WELL, HAVING DONE THESE TYPES OF EVALUATIONS IN A NUMBER OF SETTINGS, I THINK, IN GENERAL, I DON'T BELIEVE THEY'RE FLAWED. I THINK IN CERTAIN CASES, CERTAIN VERY DIFFICULT CASES, THEY PROBABLY ARE, AND I THINK THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT CASE. MARCH 14, 2003, Pg 36-37
8) Accused: I don't know how I'm not incompetent since nothing has changed since the court first found me to be incompetent. I am not saying I believe I'm incompetent, but I'm not sure of the criteria based on this court's findings previously decided. I have yet to even be provided with a copy of Dr. Patenaude's report. If nothing has changed, then how I can be anything different than what I was originally? August 27, 2003, Pg 10
9) THE COURT: But I don't think there are going to be any items not authorized. I'm not presuming to interfere with ongoing legitimate security considerations. If there were a knife or something like that in this material, you would have the right to remove it, so I'm not saying it would be beyond inspection. October 1, 2003, pg 36
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
I learned there is a common mental condition called the Matzrix Syndrome, in which a person becomes blind to facts and reality, however they are unaware of it and will deny it, as their brain generates (false) visual images so they continue to believe that what they see is real and truthful, while committing the most heinous of crimes, believing their action and conduct to be lawful, when in fact and reality their conduct is facially unlawful.
People who suffer from this mental condition are unable to confront each others illegal, and sometimes unlawful, actions, when in groups of two or more.
Put 3 people with the Matzrix Syndrome together in a room, and they actually believe ANYTHING is possible. Nothing could be further from the truth.
I don’t know the future. I didn't come here to tell you how this is going to end. I came here to tell you how it’s going to begin.
In the Matzrix Syndrome mind they cannot believe the fact and reality that they are not in control of others lives, without authority. In their minds, other souls are but "mere mortals." To them they are Gods, able to deny rights, and to impose their will upon others, without limits.
None of us want to believe that we’re not in control of our lives, but our beliefs are often not the same as the truth. People with the Matzrix Syndrome need to control others, without regard to the facts, the law or reality of time and space.
A gun is the recommened solution to end the Syndrom, when all else fails. It is more humane way to put them out of their misery and agony. It is cruel to watch someone suffering and do nothing.
“That is why it’s going to work.”
While Killercop is getting ready for a massive attack on the LAPD and the Agents, his brain tells him that nobody has ever done anything like this.
However, that’s exactly the reason why Killercop believes it’ll succeed. Freedom and liberty is the right to choose. Choice is one of the main truths in Killercop and in the law, and it all eventually worked simply because he chose to believe it will.
People's senses when suffering from the Matzrix Syndrome, and their brain’s interpretation of the signals they send, can feel real, even if they aren’t. There’s no way of knowing – until they know. Often too late.