 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
“Crazy people don't know they're crazy. I know I'm crazy, therefore I'm not crazy, isn't that crazy?” ― Captain Jack Sparrow
Judge a man by his questions rather than his answers. -VOLTARE A hypothetical question is one asked out of interest, as the answer will have no effect on the situation.
JUDGE MATZ: "Okay. I'm going to prevent the witness from answering the question, because this is my standard practice. Ladies and gentlemen [of the jury], "we" all know that "anything is possible." The question calls for speculation, that lacks a foundation, is an impermissible question.~Judge Howard Matz, trial of Killercop NO QUESTION. DONE DEAL. GAME OVER. MIND MADE UP. NO APPEAL. I AM JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONER.
"But either way, you're going to trial, unless you decided that there's an alternative thing you want to do, and I'm hoping you won't, which is plead guilty." ~Judge Howard Matz, Pretrial of Killercop. 01.14.2003 A.K.A. DOUBLE SPEAK, A.K.A. THE CASE OF A CAPTIVE AUDIENCE IS A WONDERFUL THING!! MATZ KNEW I WAS NOT GUILTY! A defendant is denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when he is "forced into a trial with the assistance of a particular lawyer with whom he [is] dissatisfied, with whom he[will] not cooperate, and with whom he [will] not, in any manner whatsoever, communicate." Brown v. Craven, 424 F.2d 1166, 1169 (9th Cir. 1970). MATZ KNEW I.T. IS COMPLEX SERIOUSLY COMPLEX
SO... "[And] in the year 2025 we're still trying to figure out if you've got a lawyer that's going to be okay for you the way you see it. That's not going to happen because at some point I have the power and "the obligation" to find that you have waived your right to have a lawyer re-present you. And then you're going to trial on your own. BUT EITHER WAY, you're going to trial!" ~Judge A Howard Matz, 01.14.2003 Pretrial of Killercop.
HE MEANS "ITS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN" BECAUSE, ATTORNEYS ARE TOO AFRAID, OR CORRUPTED, OF HIS GOOD BUDDY IN THE NINTH CIRCUIT, AND HIS OTHER POLITICAL FRIENDS WILL PROTECT HIM FROM ANY JUSTICE. AS ALWAYS, HE IS WRONG.
THE POWER OF A SUGGESTION CAN CHANGE THE COURSE OF OUR HISTORY. "The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they try to alter the facts to fit their views."
You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice. If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice. "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
"Hypothetical questions are asked out of interest and should not have an affect on any situation. Most people, when hiding that they are asking a question for themselves, will say 'hypothetically speaking.'" The following takes place in Los Angeles, 03.14.2003. Well before the secret hearing. Two months after "His" discusssion of a "Guilty plea" on 01.14.2003. Not 'mine.'
JUDGE MATZ: "Okay. All right. The reason I’m asking you these questions is, is that if I -- if I were to tell you -- and, again, this is -- I guess has to be a hypothetical question --but the breakdown of communications between Killercop and his prior three attorneys, as well as Mr. Nicolaysen -- and by, breakdown, I describe what you saw this morning...."
Doctor. "HMM-HMM."
JUDGE MATZ: "Directly followed discussions of pleading guilty, and what Killercop would have to do and have to admit to in order to resolve the case, is it possible that, perhaps, Killercop simply gets very, very angry to the point where he refuses to control himself, and instead, expresses his anger when he's confronted with the fact that it's maybe time to either settle the case or get ready for trial?"
MR. NICOLAYSEN: "YOUR ODOR, PERMIT ME. I DON'T MEAN TO OBJECT IN THIS TYPE OF PROCEEDING, I AM BUT YOUR HUMBLE SLAVE AND CAPTIVE, BUT I DON'T WANT THE RECORD TO SUGGEST THAT THE ASSUMPTION IS, IN FACT, CORRECT." THAT'S A LOT OF UNLAWFUL FACT FINDING...
"Yes. I don't think the record does suggest that. I don't construe it to be anything other than a hypothetical question.
I don't have any assumption, and I’m certainly not making any findings." "But i think the way to really get the question ‘framed’ in a way that i think would assist me, is to ask it this way,... Doctor, hypothetically speaking, to the extent that it's an inherent function of a criminal defense attorney in representing effectively the best interest of his client, to explore with the prosecutor, a reasonable plea agreement that might limit some "downside risks" to the defendant; and, two, secondly, to the extent that that attorney then has an "obligation" to discuss with the defendant, the discussions the attorney may have had with the prosecutor; do you think that the combination of those two things would make it difficult for Killercop to work with his attorney, whoever that attorney is?
DOCTOR: I think based on what I saw today, yes. JUDGE MATZ: Hypothetically speaking if you saw this would it change your mind?
THE WITNESS:Based on that? Hypothetically speaking, sure!!
A HYPOTHETICAL QUESTION FOR RANDY, KEITH OR KATHY. WOULD IT BE BETTER TO SHOOT JUDGE MATZ, FROM TEN YARDS AWAY, IN THE HEAD OR IN THE FOOT HE LOVES TO PUT INTO HIS MOUTH? I WASN''T SURE, SO I BROUGHT DYNAMITE, JUST IN CASE! MORE OF THE CORRUPT "HAVE TO" EXCUSES INSTEAD OF FACTS. THIS TIME IT IS THE WIZARD OF KOZ AND "INFER." THAT MEANS TO GUESS. OR JUST TAKE A STAB OR A SHOT IN THE DARK! WHO NEEDS FACTS??
IT IS MUCH MORE FUN TO TORTURE PEOPLE IN SECRET AND INFER IT NEVER HAPPENED. IN THIS PROCESS, ANYTHING CAN AND DOES HAPPEN. AND THEN SOME. Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
