 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
You Be Their Judge! IT IS SO ORDERED: NONE OF THESE MEN AND WOMEN ARE DEEMED TO HAVE AN "ENTITLEMENT" TO THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL, SINCE I ALONE HAVE DEEMED THAT THEY WAIVED THAT "ENTITLEMENT," THROUGH AN "IMPLICIT FINDING!"
NOR MAY THEY REPRESENT THEMSELVES! COUNSEL SHALL BE FORCED ON TO THEM.
THAT "ENTITLEMENT," AS OUTLINED BELOW, IS SO WAIVED FOR THE ALL.
THEY CAN'T DENY THE REVENGE THING, EITHER!
HAVING FOUND THEM ALL INCOMPETENT, IN MY SECRECT STATUS CONFERENCE, THEY SHALL ALL NOW RECEIVE AN SUBSTANTIAL ILLEGAL SENTENCE. LIKE A SLOW DEATH.
IT MIGHT BE A PRUDENT THING TO DO.
ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU DECIED TO PLAY GOD WITH MY FAMILY AND MY RIGHTS, IN MY COUNTRY. SO HERE IS A SECRET FOR YOU.
Lies end here.
PLEASE STAND BY, WE ARE EXPERIENCING A "TECHNICAL ERROR"
Read the effects of the "ERROR" Read more effects of this "ERROR"
You call it an "ERROR." We call it a Violations of Fundamental Rights.
Remember those things, Fundamental Rights? We used to have them in America, now we only have "some of them, but not all of them. " And now they are called "entitlements," by your captors.
ARE YOU CLEAR? Reasonable doubt is defined as follows: It is not a mere possible doubt because everything relating to human affairs is open to some possible or imaginary doubt. It is that state of the case which, after the entire comparison and consideration of all the evidence, leaves the minds of the jurors in that condition that they cannot say that they feel an abiding conviction of the truth of the charge.
But as a practical matter, does that really make a difference if nobody in America cares enough to right this wrong? Or this lie? I can assure you it will prevent this. And maybe this.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
Indictments Of The People, For The People, By The People.
Impose Your Verdict And Sentence On My "Captive Audience!"
The Accused:
The Charges: COUNT: 1 Violation Of the Oath To Protect The Fundamental Rights Of The People.
COUNT: 2. Pleading Ignorance Of The Law
COUNT: 3 Aiding and Abetting A Selective Prosecution.
COUNT: D
COUNT: D.1 Denial Of The Due Process Clause, While Obstructing Justice, And Violating His Oath To The People, All At The Same Time, In The Secret Hearing.
COUNT: D.2 Conspiring to defraud the People through a lie.
COUNT: E Hiding The Key Of The Knowledge Of The Nature.
COUNT: 4 Forcing counsel on Killercop, then covering it up by denying more Due Process. A.K.A. Foisting counsel.
COUNT F: Violation of this law by failing to tell the people of California, and Global Crossing, Inc. the truth about this information "GIVEN" to me by Judge A. HOWARD MATZ!
COUNT: 5
COUNT: 5b MISQUOTING THE LAW OVER AND OVER
COUNT: 5f Failure to even read the law. Then after reading it, ignoring it. And even changing the words of the law.
COUNT: 6
COUNT: 7 Conduct unbecoming an officer of the court. The Accused:
Attorney, Gregory Nicolaysen The Charges: COUNT: 1 Practicing Law Without A License.
COUNT 2:
COUNT C: Arrogance (If it were a crime)
COUNT D: Conspiracy to violate the rights of Killercop.
COUNT 3: Obstructing Justice The Accused:
Attorney, and U.S. prosecutor, Debra Yang The Charges:
COUNT: 1 Selective Prosecution and Corruption
COUNT: 2 Telling Lies To The American People
COUNT: C Hating Freedom Of Speech and Covering up Hate Crimes
COUNT: D Violation of this law b failing to tell the people of California, and Global Crossing, Inc. the truth about this information "GIVEN" to me by DEBRA YANG! With the assistance of Elena Duarte. The Accused:
Judge Alex Kozinski The Charges: COUNT: 1 Failure To Provide Equal Protection.
COUNT: 2 Failure To Protect The Fundamental-Rights Of The People On An Appeal While Violating Ninth Circuit General Order 5. et seq. inter alia, On The Rehearing. Ibid.
COUNT: 3 Transmitting Porn In Interstate Commerce (PDF) COUNT: 4 COUNT: 5 COUNT: 6 Copyright Violations Of Music Files Over The Internet
COUNT: 7 Transmitting Child Porn And Having An Affair With The Prosecutor "By Inference" And By Crossing Interstate Lines, By A Satellite, Right? Okay, I made that last one up.
COUNT: 8 Forcing representatives on the Killercop, who have a spoken and an unspoken conflict.
COUNT: 8.1 Ignoring the Facts. The Accused:
The Los Angeles Police Department: The Charges: COUNT: 1 Strong Arm Extortion Of Our Property COUNT: 1.1 Strong Arm Extortion Of Our Property COUNT: 2 COUNT: 2.1 COUNT: 3 COUNT: 4 Telling Lies To The American Citizens COUNT: 4C Covering up their crimes A.K.A. Playing Powerfully Stupid. The Accused:
N.B.C. NEWS The Charges: COUNT: 1 Bias Reporting COUNT 2 Defamation COUNT: 3 Slander COUNT: 4 Lies To The American People The Accused:
F.B.I. Agent Kenneth G McGuire The Charges: COUNT: 1 Lying to the American People and Judge Matz COUNT 2 Being a CPA but being unable to count correctly.
The Charges: COUNT: 1 Conflicted Counsel. COUNT: 2 Coward, Chicken And Liar. CURRENT STATUS: WANTED FOR QUESTIONING. LAST KNOWN LOCATION WAS DHS WORKING FOR ROBERT BONNER, THE GOOD FRIEND OF TRIAL JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ. ADDITIONAL PRETRIAL FACTS TO SUPPORT THE CHARGES: Addendums And Dumb Dumbs, like U.S. Marshal Darcy Smith and Deputy Ruiz. A BIG MAC ATTACK ON JURISDICTION Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
