“Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy.”

A GUMP STATEMENT
"There's a pathology that society has to deal with. There are people who want to display their prowess in Internet technology -- but they screw up big time." ~Judge Alvin Howard Matz
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS
WSJ
NY TIMES HIT PIECE
FOX NEWS HIT PIECE
NBC NEWS HIT PIECE
2023 HIT LIST
(c)1997-2023
All Rights Reserved.
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
MATZ THE COMPUTER GOD
AMEN
Transcript of 12.04.2002 Case CR-02-350(A)-AHM
Page 18, Lines 13-25
Judge Matz: “I don’t think, as I understand the case, and as I understand these charges that have been filed against Killercop that the mechanics, the technology, the capacity in a sophisticated way to use computers is really much of an issue in this case.
I don’t think that’s what the trial is likely to focus on at all.
So I think you could have somebody who has never see a computer but is a fine lawyer and a dedicated and hard working one do a Perfectly competent, maybe absolutely bank-up job for this defendant. That’s my view.”

WELL THAT'S JUST DANDY!! SO LONG AS DUE PROCESS ENTITLES KILLERCOP TO YOUR "VIEW," AS A LEGAL DEFENSE, IN A COMPLEX COMPUTER CASE,
LETS ASK SOME OF HIS FRIENDS IF THEY FEEL, IN THEIR VIEW, IF THEY WOULD ACCEPT THAT, AS DUE PROCESS, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT GETS UNLIMITED EXPERTS.
WOULD YOU?
Prof. John C. Coffee, Ronald J. Nessim, Howard Matz , Robert S. Fink and Michael J. Madigan

BY THE WAY, HOWARD, NEVER DID FIND THAT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH, IN HERE.
ARE YA'LL STACKING THE DECK, OR YA JUST DON'T PLAIN CARE WHO KNOWS ANYMORE?
BUT EVEN A FIRST YEAR LAW STUDENT OF HARVARD KNOWS YOU WOULD BE STUPID TO COVERUP A CRIME. AND THAT IS A FACT.
SO IS THIS!
A FLAPDOODLE
FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT

TWITTER
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.


MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.
LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE.
|  |