 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Computer Hardware Address Type Codes HLEN This is the length of the hardware address, expressed in bytes. For an Ethernet interface with the standard MAC address of 48 bytes, this field would contain 6. CHADDR This is the client’s hardware address. It is interpreted in conjunction with the HTYPE (hardware address type) field and the HLEN (hardware address length). It is provided by the client in a BOOTREQUEST message, and is used by the server to identify the entries in the BOOTP database associated with this client. It was also designed to provide a server with a MAC address for the client, which it could store in its ARP cache to avoid having to use an all-ones broadcast in a BOOTREPLY. BOOTP Process Details The CHADDR is set to the MAC address of the client.
SOURCE: IP Addressing and Subnetting, Including IPv6 Author: J. D. Wegner, Robert Rockell ISBN: 1928994016 Published: 2000 Publisher: Syngress Media
JOIN IN THE COURT: CALL THE FIRST WITNESS AND THE EXPERTS, LIKE JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ.
QUESTION TO FBI: HOW DO YOU TRACE A COMPUTER TRANSMISSION OR RECEPTION OF A FILE?
A: "WELL, TO TRACE A COMPUTER TRANSMISSION YOU MUST SHOW AN IP ADDRESS, COUPLED WITH THE MAC ADDRESS, AND A LOG FILE OF THE TRANSFER. OTHERWISE YOU ARE JUST GUESSING:"
Q: DO YOU HAVE ANY EXHIBITS TO SHOW THE COURT? A: "YES" Exhibits: 1 ORIGINAL APPEAL ON MAC ISSUE FROM THE BRIEF 2 REHEARING MOTION PAGES ON MACS DENIED ILLEGALLY BY ALEX KOZINSKI, A CLOSE FRIEND OF THE JUDGE. 3 ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPTS FROM DISTRICT COURT TRIAL 4 MAC BOMBER (PRE APPEAL AND TRIAL - GOVERNMENT'S KNOWLEDGE) 5 SUNG PARK, APPEAL ATTORNEY FALSE CONFESSION AND FACTS TO SHOW HE LIED TO THE COURT. EMAIL HERE.
Claims of sufficiency of the evidence are reviewed de novo. United States v. Shipsey, 363 F.3d 962, 971 n.8 (9th Cir. 2004). Findings of fact, however, are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Doe, 136 F.3d 631, 636 (9th Cir. 1998). Evidence is sufficient to support a conviction unless, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, no rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979). “The same test applies to both jury and bench trials.” Doe, 136 F.3d at 636; Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton, 348 F.3d 789, 793 (9th Cir. 2003).
But that never stopped us from quoting the Sutcliffe case several times to Con-gress, without a shred of evidence that anything crossed a state line, or was even "transmitted" by anyone.
NEW!!!! ASK JUDGE MATZ A QUESTION!!
QUESTION: HOW DO YOU TURN A NO INTO A YES?
QUESTION: HOW DO YOU CHANGE THE WORD, AND THE MEANING OF THE WORD, IN THE LAW, LIKE TRANSMITS, TO POSTS.
A big M.A.C. attack! A.K.A. But the consequences will never be the same. Ask an expert! Or ask the Oracle.
TAKE KILLERCOP'S CLASS
THE M.A.C. ADDRESS IS "THE D.N.A. OF INTERNET-SCIENCE" FOR "BACK TRACING" BAD GUYS!
SEE ALSO MAC Filtering—Every network device (this includes wireless cards, both internal and external) are assigned their own Media Access Control (MAC) address, also known as the physical address. The address is either printed on a sticker attached to the device or can be accessed via computer itself. By restricting allowed connections to specific MAC addresses you further secure the network. When visitors bring their own equipment, you’ll need them to give you the MAC address so you can add it as an allowed device. You can remove the device from the list after they leave. SEE ALSO JURISDICTION
How Cops Traced The Craigs List Killer By DNS
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
Special Agent, F.B.I., Jeff Cugno: Under Examination By A.U.S.A. Prosecutor Elena J.Duarte. A: I submitted a grand jury subpoena to Yahoo to
obtain the subscriber information which would include
the originating IP address and who initiated that
account. Q. And that led you to know what, or what was contained in the information that you received from Yahoo? A. The information I received described the IP address. A. It's an Internet protocol address, which is specific for a location. Q . Series of numbers separated by dots; correct: A. Correct. Q. Is it fair to say that there are no two IP A. Correct.
LIE NUMBER ONE. WE ALL KNOW @ KILLERCOP.COM THAT ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE THEREFORE TWO IP ADDRESSES CAN BE IDENTICAL AT ANY GIVEN POINT IN TIME. THIS INCLUDES PAST-TENSE, PRESENT-TENSE, AND FUTURE-TENSE.
Q . All right, what did you do once you learned
what the IP address was? A. I then found out who owned that IP address
and I learned that AT&T Broadband owned that address. Q. And this is meat and potatoes computer investigation, right? A. Correct. Q. Once you had an IP address, you want to know
who the ISP is, who owns that IP address, right? A. Correct. Q. And then you go to that ISP and you ask to A. Correct. Q. Did you go to AT&T? A. I did go to AT&T. Q. What did you learn? A. I learned that that IP address - - Q. I direct your attention to page 12, paragraph A. Yes, thank you. That at the time that that Pages 33-34, March 28, 2002
The relevance, Your Honor, goes to THE COURT: Okay. So that's the relevance that the
government knew that. MR. KILLERCOP: That's one. THE COURT: What's the other basis? KILLERCOP: The other basis, Your Honor, is that, as we have heard in testimony, Mrs. Greenwood was notified by Andrew Ramsey that Andrew Ramsey had traced that e-mail address evilgxhr@yahoo.com back to an IP address of 24 dot, whatever, dot 138. I don't recall the exact number. But it began with 24 and ended with 138. They tracked it to Manchester, New Hampshire. Here's where he is. Here's his IP.
As the agent has testified to in New Hampshire, that's the bread and butter -- or excuse me. He used the word, "meat and potatoes," tracking somebody who you believe is up to no good. You get their e-mail address. You get their IP address. Bang, you got him. They had everything they needed. They had the whole full-course meal, the meat and potatoes --
MR. KILLERCOP: The relevance, Your Honor, is that they were notified that, "Here he is. Come get him. He's in Manchester, New Hampshire. But, whoops, somebody, maybe from the board of directors, might have said they are going to kick his ass. You can't have the target becoming a victim now, can we? And they did nothing but sit on it and wait...
See Transcript December 3, 2003 Or go to the pretrial files.
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
