 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
Woof! Snarl! Growl! Byte! Bad Boy, Bad Boy!! Heel! Or is it heil? Call Jeff and ask him!! (310) 420-5197 jeffrey.cugno@ic.fbi.gov
A MESSAGE TO ALL OF THE POLICE WHO WITNESSED THIS CRIME TAKE PLACE IN THE STATE OF THE NEW-HAMPSHIRE, THE "LIVE FREE OR DIE" STATE, AND DID NOTHING. BUT LAUGH. I can, but do not need to defend myself And the absurd accusations that the press has clinged onto. If we need a nude photo of me to prove that I am far different than the soon-to-be-murdered-in-their-home members of a certain secret society has decided to fabricate, that is easy. But if one more "journalist" makes a cavalier statement about me ..., I will personally or with my fans help, greet them at their home and discover just how much they believe in their freedom of speech. I dare you all to write one more thing that you won't say to my face. Because I will make you say it. In that manner. That is a threat. Mm ON THE RECORD IWTH HIZZZZZZZZZZZODER "In addition, the behavior that Killercop engaged in, in connection with this particular series of charges and his conduct after he was placed in custody suggests that he has a strong view that these charges are bogus and that his rights and dignity as an individual have been compromised and invaded..." KILLERCOP: "Mrs. Greenwood, after you made the statement, "On the Killercop indictment, 'could he get more time' if more counts were added? If yes, I could search through and 'come up' with more threats," did you not continue and say, "For example, he had a page from Mark Labaton 'In honor of the recently deceased." Did you not make that statement immediately following that?" GREENWOOD: " No. My recollection, from what I saw a few minutes ago, is yes. I'm not a hundred percent sure because I don't have the document in front of me, but that is my recollection from what I saw a few minutes ago." KILLERCOP: "To accomplish your goal, which you couldn't do by shutting down the website because it's not against the law to publish information, you decided you were going to go through this website and you were going to get your goal and you are going to create threats that are not there, and you are going to take statements that are just out of context or vague statements --"
THE COURT: "Okay, Killercop, I have told you --" KILLERCOP: "I'm just trying to ask her a question, Your Honor."
THE COURT: "Okay. You asked that question before. I granted the government's objection and you heard why and you are doing it again. Don't repeat anything which you've already been precluded from doing or about which I've already issued a ruling. I want to explain something to you, ladies and gentlemen. Killercop is entitled, and will have the opportunity, to argue what he thinks the evidence shows and fails to show and permissible inferences from the evidence. . . Whether or not it is a legally correct proposition that it's not a crime to post threats is something I will explain to you, and I will tell you what the law is as to that. So whether it's Killercop or the prosecutor, if somebody asks a question of a witness and puts into the question an assertion of what the law is, you are not bound by that. I told you that at the beginning. A question isn't evidence. And counsel and the defendant in this case are not entitled to try to tell you what the law is in the form of their questions. Now, proceed, Killercop..." KILLERCOP: Factually, I never got to finish my question before your rude interruption, nevertheless. "Now, Mrs. Greenwood, where you were interested in coming up with more threats where you wanted to search through this website so that Killercop could get more time added, other than the -- when I read to you the, "For example, he had a page from Mark Labaton 'In honor of the recently deceased,' now did you ever make the statement also in there that "the Labaton threat" was particularly disturbing?" GREENWOOD: "Yes, I believe I did write that in there." KILLERCOP: So the words, "In honor of the recently deceased," which linked to an article on the demise and Global Crossing sinking into Chapter 11, was particularly disturbing; is that your testimony?" GREENWOOD: "Yes." KILLERCOP: "WELL, OKEY DOKIE THEN. THAT SOUNDS "REASONABLE" TO ME, IF BY REASONABLE YOU MEAN NUTZ. HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT TORTURE? "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
CUJO THE RABID DOG EATS MEAT AND POTATO'S! A.K.A. K.K.K.? Nope! The D.O.J! Department of Jihad
Agent Cugno did nothing while I was choked by the cops while being booked, for speech crimes, in Manchester, New Hampshire. The "Live Free Or Die" State. Instead of stopping the choking, he laughed. Because he selectively arrested me. He didn't really understand the law, or care about it at all. And now someone is going to die. And I have to pay another reward. But first I have to sell something in commerce, so I can raise the prices! Are you still laughing, Jeff? If so, then you are the one who is nutzzzz, or as they call it in the federal system, incompetent.
But they can only say that about ya if ya git one of them-thar Sirtifffffy Cates! Me? I am still "un certifiably" competent. So I guess that makes me, ummm, "incompetent," or "un incompetent," without one of them-thar Sirrtifffffy Cates? But I am no expert. Don't try to understand it all, it is too complex for the F.B.I. But if ya buy me a Big Mac, we can discuss it over a beer. And for the record, Special Ken is not invited. Or Chuck. I must warn you though, due to the "treatment on my throat" by the cops in Manchester, I now have to whisper. Am I being clear? You were the agent who typed up the facts for the indictment ...right? I know, another "mistake," right? So again, all I am left with is unanswered questions by Hizzzzzoner, and your agent friends, as to why you allowed this. And this? And what do you propose we do about that 800 pound White Elephant sitting in the middle of the room? Aside from the choking. I know you told me once, in the prison; when Judge Matz forced(?) you to hand deliver some of my "discovery," that wasn't lost/stolen, that you weren't sure why you didn't stop them from choking me...have you figured it out? Are you one of the hooded, racist bigots? Or are you a part of the hate machine? And why did you let Dan above go? Was he Schmoe? Was he a part of the coporate prison machine? Did Schmoe buy out like Gary? Don't bother to answer, I figured it out in my head during all those illegal and unlawful years in prison. It was fundamental. Sort of like the "If you're not with us, then you're against us," the mob rules and a gang mentality. I totally understand now. It has become "pretty clear." But that is probably really overstating my point. But I guess you're a "reasonable" listener, right? So it doesn't really matter what I say, one of the Department Of Jihad attorneys can go and twist my words anyway they want under the listener standard. And if that won't work they still got the reasonable speaker standard, too. Anything but what the actual law says, right? They sure won't use that. One last thing, were you ordered by the exalted Cyclops, Dragon or Wizard to do this cover up? Or was it the Goblin? And did you cheat on your test, too?
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
