 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
IT was always about the jurisdiction.
Remember! Insinuations do not provide the kind of objectively verifiable proof that perverts require.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 THIS SPACE FOR SALE |
Sent by Regular Mail and E-mail: Law Office of Sung B. Park, Esq. 12.28.2005 RE: Missing Jurisdiction Motion From Official File Of CR 02-350(A)-AHM This letter shall serve to memorialize our last conversation today in your office. You informed me that in your attempt to obtain the 66 separate pre-trial motions, government’s replies, and various minute orders, etc., which we sat down and identified, at your office on December 5th, 2005, you have noticed that the defense’s Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction, which was “PLACED IN FILE – NOT USED, is now missing, along with another document “PLACED IN FILE – NOT USED.” You have informed me that you were unable locate these two documents and could give no explanation as to who took them from the file, when, or why. Furthermore, for the record I am requesting you file something to the Court to notify them of the missing Motions. Clearly the judge ruled on the Motion. See Transcript of 11.07.2003 Page 72, Lines 1-14 Defendant: First off, let’s talk about the jurisdictional challenge. When will that be heard on? I assume prior to trial beginning.” Judge: “The jurisdictional "motion" has been denied. ” Defendant: “You denied it?” Judge: “I denied it .” Defendant: “Based on what law, authority?” Judge: “The motion lacks merit, Killercop. I already told you. If the government establishes that the facilities of interstate commerce were used, the jurisdictional element has been established and your rights have been protected. Now I’m not going to go over that ground again.” [Mr Park,] I am sure you will agree I can not receive a meaningful and through review of a ruled upon Motion if the Motion is now been taken [obstructed] from the official file. This must be what Judge Matz was referring to when he said on 09.23.2003, Page 75, Lines 3-8: “You can arrange for all subpoenas. I want the jury instructions that were previously agreed to, to make sure you make those available to Mr. Reed and I need a diskette, because I lost the one or we can’t find the one. There seems to be a goblin surrounding this case… This was not the only thing to go missing in the night in this case. There was also other "missing" CD-ROMS," not that the judge cared one bit. And the Certificate from the secret hearing. And the experts and all their files and reports. Maybe the goblin took them?
TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. THIS SPACE FOR SALE
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
