"Suspicion
that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86
(1st Cir. 2004)

"What would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, Pre-Trial, discussing killercop.com

"The 'Behavior' that neither resulted in a conviction nor even an arrest but that was facially unlawful, and in any event a very chilling indication of the consideration as to how likely it is that he would commit further crimes is that he undoubtedly and indisputably set up this killercop.com web site." -Judge A. Howard Matz, SENTENCING HEARING OF KILLERCOP, DISCUSSING KILLERCOP.COM

WHEN YOU ANNOY YOUR SECRET POLITICAL ENEMIES IN AMERICA, THEY TORTURE YOU. UNTIL YOU SHOOT THEM.

Since 1982, the American Library Association has sponsored Banned Books Week as a tribute to free speech and open libraries.
Full List
Library Controversy
- Censorship in Modern Times
- Candide
- The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
- Brave New World
- 1984
- The Catcher in the Rye
- Lolita
- I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings
- The Anarchist Cookbook
- The Satanic Verses
- Harry Potter Series
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA.
When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions.
Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson

REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
 
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"

WHOIS
WSJ
2023 HIT LIST
TERMS OF USE
DISCLAIMER
PRIVACY POLICY
(c)1997-2023
THIS SPACE FOR SALE |

WIKI WIKI WIKI! OY! OY! OY!
Killercop added two lines of text to Judge Matz' bio page on WIKI on March 5th of 2010. One regarding a substitution of 'entitlements' in place of your rights by the U.S. Federal courts, in the Central District of California. The other was a link to an admission by Judge Matz to not following the law, nor correcting the violation of the law.
Judge Matz as you may recall is the trial judge of Killercop. Well, here at killercop.com I call it a "trial in name only."
On April 1st, 2010 someone from 76.91.171.244 comes along and DELETES the links.

I ADDED THEM BACK ON 04.02.2010 AND THE SAME IP ADDRESS CAME BACK, RECENTLY, AND REMOVED THE SPEECH, AGAIN. SO I ADDED PART OF IT BACK.
Then on the 5th, someone at this address 76.250.11.200 deletes me, again. Then on April 7th, 2010 someone from 76.91.171.244 comes along and DELETES the links.
SO I ADDED PART OF IT BACK. JUST THE EXTERNAL LINK THIS TIME.
He came back on the 14th. I came back on the 15th. And so on, and so on...then this guy comes along out of the blue and deletes my link on the 19th, without responding to the issue I presented to him in the comment section; WHY ARE YOU DELETING THE LINK? He claims my link is "vandalism," because I flattered him by copying his username page and has me "blocked" for the moment, so you can't see the external link.
Classic disinformation without responding to the issue and the question posed to him in the first place. WHY ARE YOU DELETING THE LINK?
It is not SPAM. It is simply another voice in the mix speaking truthfully, backed up by facts.
Something Judge Matz ignores.
Will WIKI have the courage and conviction to stand up to these bullies?
Will freedom of speech be suppressed, again?
Stay tuned to find out here.

A QUESTION FOR MY JURY:
WHY IS IT OKAY FOR THE U.S. DISTRICT COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES, CORPORATION, TO HAVE A VOICE IN THE "EXTERNAL" SPEECH SECTION OF WIKIPEDIA, BUT NOT YOU OR I, IF "THEY" DECIDE WE MUST BE SILENCED?
RULES AND LAW BE DANMED?
ISSUES WITH OUR SPEECH? AND BY OUR I MEAN ME. SAME THING FOR WE. AND THE GOBLIN.
FACT: JUDGE MATZ HAS HANDED DOWN "SUBSTANTIAL" ILLEGAL SENTENCES.

TWITTER (CENSORED 03.26.2023)

They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing.
"Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel
With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation.
TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
NY TIMES HIT PIECE
FOX NEWS HIT PIECE
NBC NEWS HIT PIECE
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE.
LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
SALES INQUIRIES CLICK HERE.
FAQ 1 - FAQ 2 - CONTEXT.
THIS SPACE FOR SALE
All Rights Reserved. |
 |