 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
A particular error Judge A. Howard Matz continued to commit even after having been repeatedly-corrected on other appeals.
It was not necessary, but Judge Matz claim's He's doing it "for my best interest..." A.K.A. THE CASE OF "NEVER HIT A MAN WITH GLASSES, USE A BAT INSTEAD!" "For you to go to bat and take the case to trial or even to pursue a plea, if that's what you were alluding to before, with these lawyers is going to be totally against your interest and against my duty to assure that you get effective assistance of Counsel." ~Judge A. Howard Matz, Pg. 19, Sept. 23, 2002, Pre-trial of killercop.com.
JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ IS POWER MAD, AND ARROGANTLY FLAUNTS THE LAW, BY HANDING DOWN "SUBSTANTIAL" ILLEGAL PRISON SENTENCES, EVEN AFTER BEING TOLD WHAT HE WAS DOING IS UNLAWFUL.
EXAMPLES: OCT 08 2004 "Blakely issues exist with regard to the loss and restitution calculations which were based in part on facts neither found by a jury nor
admitted by the appellants. We therefore vacate the appellants’ sentences and remand for reconsideration in light of United States v. Ameline,
No. 02-30326, (9th Cir. July 21, 2004) (applying Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004) to the United States Sentencing Guidelines).
See United States v. Castro, No. 03-50444 (9th Cir. Aug27, 2004) (per curiam)."
In file 2004 11 8.pdf, (Nov 8, 2004) [ONE MONTH AFTER THE ABOVE RULING] Judge A. Howard Matz states to Killercop that he read the Castro decision very carefully. But omits knowledge of the above rule of the law, following the guidance he claims to seek. Listen in: "I've read the Castro decision carefully; and of course, that decision reflects what is the fundamental background context to this motion, which is that "we're" waiting...for Supreme Court guidance on the aftermath of Blakely and Ameline. How soon that guidance will be provided and what it will be, I have no desire to speculate about, but facing that confusion..."
SIDEBAR:: "SO YOU CAN ROT IN PRISON UNDER CONFLICTED COUNSEL, FOISTED ON YOU BY MY BUDDY AND GOOD FRIEND CHIEF JUDGE ALEX KOZINSKI, WHILE HE AND I, AND GARY, ROAM FREE AT LIBERTY TO DENY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, AT WILL. ON FACTS NOT FOUND BY THE JURY!
11.17.2004 These enhancements [by Judge A. Howard Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004).
See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges
11.17.2004 "These enhancements [by Judge A. Howard Matz] violated the rule [of law] that sentence enhancements can be based only on facts, proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt, as announced in United States v. Ameline, 376 F.3d 967, 980 (9th Cir. 2004).
See also Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). Absent these questioned enhancements, the sentencing ranges COVERED UP : A.K.A. IF HE HAD ONLY KNOWN! A.K.A. A COVER UP.
06.15.2005 "We cannot determine from the record whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence as to either Defendant [if it had known] that the Guidelines were advisory rather than mandatory, as the Supreme Court held in Booker. In fulfilling this mandate, the district court may hold such hearings and enter such orders as it determines to be necessary, including, without limitation, modifying or vacating its previous sentence.
HE KNEW, THEY KNEW, YET HE WAS ALLOWED TO HAND DOWN SUBSTANTIAL PRISON SENTENCES, ILLEGALLY. ALL THE WHILE CLAIMING CONFUSION AND IGNORANCE. YES, BUT BY WHO? AND WHY IS HE ALLOWED TO REMAIN? "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
"I'm not willing to require these lawyers to permit you, against your best interest, to require these lawyers to to remain as your lawyers."~Judge Matz, Pg. 21, Sept. 23, 2002, Pretrial of killercop.com. Nor Would He Allow Killercop re-present himself! How you like those apples, Johnny! A FACT AND A QUESTION.
WITHOUT ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL JUDGE A. HOWARD MATZ COULD HAND OUT MANY "SUBSTANTAIL ILLEGAL SENTENCES," AND DID JUST THAT!! SO WHY IS HE STILL SITTING ON THE BENCH?
"YOU got too much baggage in this case. And it's not necessary for me to make any findings about who's right and who's wrong. I'm not saying you're wrong. I don't know for sure." ~Judge A. Howard Matz to Killercop. Circa Fall of 2002.
Matz is very selective on his "findings." Everything else is "just your opinion or contention." And he plays dumb when it serves his, or his buddies, needs. OUR FINDINGS: AND BY OUR I MEAN ME AND THE GOBLIN.
The case he personally signed off as "complex." No "assistance" of counsel found here at the pre-trial of the killercop.com. No assistance means yes, forced assistance! No "Confrontation Clause" found here. No "Due Process" found here. Or here. No Doctor found here. Or here. No Certificate found here. No "Nature and Cause" found here. No law found here. Or here. No assistance of the counsel found here, either. No admission of any guilt, still, found here. Made up facts and no assistance found here. No spirit, or letter, of the law found here.
Justice and Irony found here. "Frivolust" misstatements found here. Goblins can be found here. A simple fact can be found here.
The Second Amendment deals directly with the right of an individual to keep and bear arms to protect themselves from an overreaching federal government." Especially of the HYBRID type...
If you torture people or eavesdrop on Americans without the warrants required by the criminal law, you receive Look-Forward Imperial Immunity. * If you shoot and kill unarmed rescuers of the wounded while occupying their country and severely wound their unarmed children sitting in a van -- or if you authorize that conduct -- your actions are commended. * If you help wreck the world economy with fraud and cause hundreds of millions of people untold suffering, you collect tens of millions of dollars in bonuses. * If you disclose to the world evidence of war crimes, government lawbreaking, or serious corruption, or otherwise embarrass the U.S., you will be [swiftly] prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and face decades in prison.
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
