 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
"At best, his extraordinary disregard for the constitutional role demonstrates incompetence; at worst, it creates the impression that he knowingly attempted to hide his most controversial work." "His unwillingness to take seriously his obligation to protect these basic fundamentl rights has potentially placed his court in jeopardy." CALL JUDGE MATZ: Telephone: 213-894-5283 EMAIL JUDGE MATZ EXTRA, EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT!!
NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET: THE MAN WHO WASN'T ALL THERE: AKA DOCTOR TOM AND THE MISSING CERTIFICATE A.K.A. MORE OF DENIAL OF THE RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE NATURE OF THE CRIME.
CONTACT KILLERCOP IF YOU CAN "Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber." -U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA. When speech is compelled, additional damage is done. Individuals are coerced into betraying their convictions. Forcing free and independent individuals to endorse ideas they find objectionable is always demeaning. -Thomas Jefferson
REPORT A GANG MEMBER.
Look, you know you have to look, there! ABOVE!! It's "a person, on the left," and "the person of another," on the right. Do you understand? No? Still Baffled? Click image below for the answer to the question, "What is a person and what is the difference between a person and the person of another?"
(c)1997-2023 TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. |
Nature of the Cause? I am Not enjoying my rights!! And now someone is going to die. A.K.A. HOW TO SCREW A U, OUT OF A CAUSE, TO MAKE A CASE. "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence." U.S. Const. amend. VI. Killercop would just settle for an unbiased judge... But we know that didn't happen at either the Pre-Pre-Trial, Pre-Trial, the Trial or the Appeal. Judge Alvin Howard Matz, said his persecution of killercop, by trial, was "complex" based on the "novel Internet-based 'nature' of the prosecution." To bad he refused to share that knowledge, and instead refused to protect that fundamental right when sought. (See Below, 01.17.2003) He refused to acknowledge a lot Especially when it protected the hate crimes of the cops against this site. Or his good buddy, Gary. And last but not least, his own tiny ass.
SAY WHAT? 01.17.2003 Pages 11-12 CLERK: “How do you plead to Count 1 of the First Superseding Indictment, guilty or not guilty?” ACCUSED: “I cannot make a plea at this time until I know the nature of this crime, as that, and the nature has seemed, has seemed to have changed in the past. So if this court could answer a question or two I might be able to make a plea at this point. Will this court answer a question or two so I can ascertain the nature of the crime so I can prepare a proper defense?” Judge Matz: “No! Judge Matz: The court will construe the response to be a plea of not guilty. The plea is applicable to each of nine counts of the First Superseding Indictment. So Killercop will be deemed to have plead not guilty to the charges in the First Superseding Indictment. That concludes the arraignment on the charges.” ACCUSED: “Let the record reflect the court is proceeding in a - - “ Judge Matz: “You and Mr. - - “ ACCUSED: “ Secret jurisdiction. I demand my right to be informed of the...“ Judge Matz: “Sit down at the table.” ACCUSED: “Nature of this crime.” Judge Matz: “Sit down. This is not going to be a debate.” ACCUSED: “You changed the nature once. You going to change it again?” “How can I prepare a defense here, if you won’t even tell me the nature of the crime?” Judge Matz: “The first order of business - - “ ACCUSED: “They told me the nature was something once. Now they have changed the nature after almost a year.” ACCUSED: "Are they going to change it again? How many - -“ Judge: “Now I am ordering you to be quiet.” The first order of business is to complete the competency examination. I have received the motion and will grant the motion, although I’m going to change slightly the language in the proposed order that the government has lodged with the court and filed. And Mr. Nicolaysen, …although there won’t be a need for you to do anything more then assist with the representation much(sic) Killercop for purposes of that competency------- examination.”
Only later would Matz and the prosecutor revel the right they both denied to the accused. The right to know the Nature and Cause. It turned out they were hiding the ol' "novel, internet nature." After Hizzzzzhonor refused to inform me, as [was] my right, I was made to rot away in hell for SEVEN MONTHS, of this denial of my rights, before I would read about the secret novel, internet "nature."
They now called the nature a ""novel" internet nature." I knew my goose was cooked. An Adjective. With another adjective. A discription, to discribe a discription. Not a fact or noun in sight. Or an expert. Thereafter I coined these types of the laws of color, "secret nature" crimes, and "adjective-fiction" nature crimes. UPDATE: I notice this "unconstitutional law" I was unlawfully tried under, and convicted of, was shat on by the Supremes. "Novel" Internet nature theory" persecutions are big now in 2009.
MONTH FOUR OF SEVEN MONTHS SAY WHAT? 04.07.2003 Judge A. Howard Matz: "The defendant's personal presence is not necessary, given that he's currently represented by Mr. Nicolaysen."
Nicolaysen: "Thank you so much. Your honor, government counsel tracks my thinking as well. I want to assure the court. We agonized over this. We spent well over an hour on the phone Friday. Spoke again on Saturday anticipating that your honor may very well want some feedback on this very point, so we're not trying to put words into the court's mouth by asking you to make a finding that you didn't make; however --"
Doctor Phil Says: Anything Coming Out Of The Mouth After "However," Negates Everything Before That Word. Just Keeping It Real.
Image that...a Star Chambers hearing, live...in America. You don't even have to be there to be judged and examined and "found;" pardon the expression, "incompetent." Wish they could have found a law book instead.
They just make it look like I were there, for the record, by forcing representatives; who refuse to assist, [3mg PDF] and are conflicted, and quacks who pretend to assist.
Crackers, if ya ask me. But remember, ""that's not an issue that I have to address and it's not a question I'm required to answer, so I decline to do so."
Let's ask an expert Or here.
(CENSORED 03.26.2023)
They all ignored their oaths, the facts, the rules, the laws, the 5th and 6th amendment and proceeded forward with a selective persecution in a secret hearing. "Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented." -Elie Wiesel With the above in mind, could you please help and make a small donation. TO DONATE JUST SCAN THE VENMO OR ZELLE QR CODE BELOW.
MEDIA INQUIRES CLICK HERE. LEGAL INQUIRIES CLICK HERE. TO PURCHASE THIS PREMIUM DOMAIN NAME CLICK HERE. | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
