 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
||
 |
|
|||||||
|
The owner(s) of this website have never been charged or arrested in connection for any speech, press, material or "behavior" contained within this website since its inception and conception in 1997 to present.
However, the publisher was arrested in a "selective prosecution" by the police and U.S. Attorney Debra Wong Yang.
The selective prosecution was allowed to proceed by the judge and so-called "defense attorneys," who both later "promptly" admitted supported censoring this very website's speech.
THE COURT: Good morning to you, Mr. Reed. I understand the government needs to be heard about something. MS. DUARTE : I do, Your Honor. I just have a couple of procedural issues. First of all, I expect that Special Agent Cugno will take the stand today, later, and my intent was to ask Special Agent Harrill, with leave of the Court, to come up and do the computer manipulation for Special Agent Cugno.
THE COURT: That's fine. You can do that.
THE COURT: That is fine.
MS. DUARTE: Okay. And last, Your Honor, I wanted to let the Court know, as well as the defendant, that at least as of this morning, upon review of the case, I have made a decision, which I expect will continue through the close of the government's evidence, which is, NOT to elicit testimony regarding Killercop.com during the case-in-chief.
Now, this may come up on defense's case. Obviously, if he brings it up, I would ask to reserve the right to get I into it then, as well as rebuttal. But as of right now, I don't anticipate calling the witness from the L.A.P.D regarding that particular evidence.
THE COURT: Who is that witness?
MS. DUARTE: That would be Detective Terry Willis. Of the L.A.P.D. Police Department.
THE COURT: Okay.
EXPERT: "Good job of convering up the violations! IT was always about the jurisdiction. And fundamental-rights. Neither of which it appears these judges seem to recognize anymore.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975) REASONABLE DOUBT "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. (c) 1995-2026 |
Introducing The Players Lt. Steve Twohy, initial LAPD IA officer in charge of investigation of Officer Ippolito and Utly. Detective "Chuck" Zeglin Of The Los Angeles Police Department, Detective Bureau. (Covered Up The Unlawful Raid Of This Website In 1998, Assisted By The Sacramento, California Sheriffs and F.B.I. Agents, And THEN Extorted The Personal Property Therein. Covered Up The Emails Sent Here. Lied To The American People On NBC News Here. ) The Manchester, N.H. Police Department. (Tortured Sutcliffe After His Arrest While The F.B.I. Agents Laughed And Watched in 2002.) Covered up by Federal Judge A. Howard Matz and the F.B.I. *Kenneth G. McGuire, Special Agent , F.B.I., Believed To Have Lied To Judge Matz To Assist Covering Up The Censorship and Unlawful Raid And Extortion Of This Website By Police And Other F.B.I. Agents In 1998. *Alvin Howard Matz, U.S. District Court Trial Judge. (Denied Due Process and Speedy Trial and Assistance Of Counsel At The Trial. Then Admittedly Sentenced Sutcliffe To An "Illegal Sentence." Supported Bill Censoring Speech Related To This Website.) Sent 3 U.S. Marshals to Home of Sutcliffe to Intimidate and Censor Speech Critical of Him. *Debra Wong Yang, Former U.S. Attorney of California, (Selectively Prosecuted Sutcliffe While Allowing Police and F.B.I. Agents and Others To Commit Similar Crimes Against Sutcliffe As Payback For Being Attacked In This Site In 1997-2026. Supported Bill Censoring This Website.) * Elena Duarte. Assistant U.S. Attorney (Lied To The American People And Both District And Appeals Court In Prosecution Sutcliffe While Working For U.S. Attorney Debra Wong Yang.) Engaged In A Secret Hearing And Violated Rule 43, And Broke The Law Under 18 U.S.C. 4241-4244(d) Later She Admitted Her Guilt But Has Yet To Be Punished. *The Entire Federal Public Defenders Office of Central California. (Quitters One And All, Supported Bill Censoring This Website.) *Gregory Nicolaysen, Attorney (Appointed By The Federal Public Defenders Office of Central California, above, Who Then Forced Himself On The Previous Owner At Pre Trial.) One of many who also "lost files." William Harris, Attorney (Appointed By The Federal Public Defenders Office of Central California, above, Who Lost Files And Was A Complete Computer Illiterate. Not that the judge cared. *Sung Park, Appeals Attorney. ("Quit" On The Day Of The Appeal Right After He Falsely "Confessed" Sutcliffe Was Guilty Of Committing What Was Up To That Very Moment Denied For Over Five Years. Judge Kozinski Helped Him Falsely Confess To Make The Record Appear. AFTER HE QUIT: A letter from the last "forced" counsel. A reply for the "forced" counsel. An objection to the "forced" counsel. Ninth Circuit Judge Alex Kozinski lorded over the trial objections and the appeal in Sutcliffe's case in the Ninth Circuit. He allowed his "hand picked" so-called "defense" attorney to "falsely confess" to him that Sutcliffe was guilty of transferring files in question. A fact still denied by Sutcliffe. In essence he personally rigged the trial's appeal to grab jurisdiction. Sent 3 U.S. Marshals to Home of Sutcliffe to Intimidate and Censor Speech Critical of Him. Judge Stephen S. Trott, Kozinski's jurisdictional sidekick, which every Chief Judge knows, is "a valuable tool in today's commerce." Even if one believes Americans should not worry too much, about the government having to meet the burden of proving a transfer, even when they know it. Even his own sidekick knew the standard of the proof. *Assembly member Noreen Evans 7th Assembly District, California. (Wrote legislation abridging freedom of speech in California, citing this website and stating the site offered a "no questions asked reward ...for the death of two police officers.") Come on, Noreen, everyone knows we always ask questions.
"Those should be filed, but filed under seal. And I'm handing them to the clerk so that later today she can arrange for that. Now, there seems to be something like five or six subpoenas directed to law enforcement agencies. One is directed to someone named Victor J. Pietrantoni of the L.A.P.D. It appears to seek documents relating to killercop.com, all documents related to you that this individual worked on, and the names of persons that he had spoken with about those two categories.
KILLERCOP: Victor J. Pietrantoni goes to credibility of the two witnesses who are coming in to testify for the government, the two detectives from the L.A.P.D. I believe it's Mr. Katz and Mr. Willis. Both Mr. Katzls and Mr. Willis's names are within that same search warrant and document report, which is filed in support of that search warrant. Therefore, it goes to credibility of those officers.
JUDGE MATZ: Okay. Well, I'll reserve a ruling on him. I'm going to say that if the subpoena is authorized to Pietrantoni, categories 2 and 3, which are totally lacking in specificity, totally lacking in relevance, and obvious efforts to engage in a fishing expedition, will be deleted; but you may have a right to have this subpoena served as to category 1, which reads, "All tangible documents, software files, notes, reports, related to www.killercop.com you worked with, in, on or assisted." "killercop.com will have very limited application in this case. But I have issued a motion in limine. And I do anticipate there will be some evidence." Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004) FILE A COMPLAINT
TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ CLICK HERE (c) 1995-2026 | |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
