NEW: SOUND BYTES OF THE ORAL FALSE CONFESSION AND OBSTRUCTION OF THE JUSTICE.

 

ONE JUDGE TELLS HIM "THE BREAKING POINT."

 

Opening Statement Of Park:

 

Opening Statement Of Prosecutor:

 

Prosecutor Admits All Transfers Occurred By FTP

 

Prosecutor Admits They Have No Solid Proof KIllercop Transferred A Single Page By FTP.

 

Prosecutor Admits She In Fact Transferred The Files.(Taken Out Of Context, Of Course, Like My Trial.)

 

Park Admits Government Has No Proof Of A Transfer.

 

I certainly never told him I transferred anything.

 

As In Nothing.

 

Judge Kozinski Seems To Believe Mysterious Things Happen With The Internet. Like "Accidental Facts" Routed Just To His Tiny Wizard Mind To Give Him Jurisdiction Where He Has No Fact Other Then A False Confession, After He Spoon Feeds The Words To Make His False Record To Get Around The Fact That The Government's Burden Is They Must Prove Transmission And Not Just Assume It.

 

Otherwise Who Knows Where Their Power To Stop Ends Since Other People Had Access. Right, Sung Park?

 

Shall We Just Round Everyone Up, Or Just The Usual Suspects.

 

This Judge Hates That The Prosecutor Gave Me 8000 NUMB3RS. Or Maybe Debra And Elena Didn't Tell Him?

 

We Do Want To Represent The Record Accurately.

 

By the way, anyone seen an expert? If so, please have him examine our LOGS

$PECIAL REWARD$ FOR THESE COP$

OUTSIDE IT'S AMERICA

"what would be the capacity of law enforcement and of the courts to SUPRESS this kind of SPEECH?" -Judge A. Howard Matz, PRE-TRIAL HEARING OF KILLERCOP.COM

A QUESTION FOR AMERICA:

Is "pretty good" pretty much like "pretty clear?" Because I'm "pretty sure" it is not. I know, it's complex. But then again, I'm officially nutzzzzzz, until certified (.pdf) un-nutzzzzzz, in a competent court of the law. So I am waiting on the law. It sure is not speedy...but it is baffled.

I'm all a Twitter waiting to see your reaction, to my reaction, to your Treatment and the promised Restoration. You'll just die when you see what I have in store for everyone involved in the story in 2010.

Look, you know you have to look, there!! ABOVE!!

It's "another person" and "the person of another," person.

STILL BAFFFLED?

Then read the plan, promptly!! A man's life, freedom and liberty are at stake!!! And it's probably a prudent thing to do, but don't speak about it!

In fact, don't even think about it, especially the cowards and babies! But always remember, children, evil only triumphs when good men or women do nothing.

THE END.

He "Sung" Like A Bird

The "Appeal" Of Sung Park, ESQUIRE

 

Meet the governments "re-presenter," AKA the Attorney, AKA the Public Defender, who is but one of many forced on Sutcliffe.

A Couple Of Questions, America, But The Answer Can't Be "Appeal 'Strategy.'"

 

Since Sung Park, Esquire, one of several rampant attorneys at large, and almost the last of many conflicted ones forced on the previous owner by the Ninth Circuit, and currently employed by Homeland Security the day after the appeal, (think about that one for a moment) knew for a fact that the previous owner never would, or did, admit transmitting anything against the law; and nor did the government ever prove he did transmit anything against the law, why would he falsely confess that the accused was guilty of transmitting anything illegal when he knew the government had no proof?

 

Or why would the appeals court judge Alex Kozinski, force-feed him more lies, and he admit to those spoon-fed lies, knowing they were lies he could never prove.

1. Because neither knew anything abut the Internet?
2. Because the government knew they had no proof?
3. He was offered a sweetheart deal in Homeland Security, when he went along with the conflict and threw the case on purpose.
4. He knew this guy might cover up for him, the way this judge is covering up.
5. Because he was their attorney, not mine. Just like Greg, and all the rest who have a conflict.

Examine some of the players, then play connect the dots...

You might find violations of the rights under the Bill, euphemistically labeled technical errors. Those are now sometimes called "entitlements." That way, a technical error of an entitlement is not the same as a flagrant violation of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution they swore to uphold, protect and defend.

 

Especially when they know the burden of the requirements of the law. To wit, a "transfer across state lines."

Then to go and break it with a lie.

And ignore the laws of MAC, the NIC and IP.

 

Makes no sense.

 

IAC?

Contempt Of Cop

Washingtonpost.com - 'Contempt of Cop' Continued from Page 5 New D.C. police recruits were keenly aware of what they saw as deficiencies...

Blacks are arrested on 'contempt of cop' charge at higher rate - Blacks are booked by Seattle police for obstructing a public officer eight times as often as whites when population is taken into account, a Seattle P-I investigation of six years...

Henry Louis Gates' Contempt Of Cop Emptywheel - At tonight's nationally televised press conference, a reporter asked President Obama a question about the July 16 arrest of famed Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates. Obama set off...

Contempt of Cop' by William Norman Grigg - The police are to the government as the edge is to the knife, insists sociologist David Bayley, who apparently couldn't explain why the typical...

Expert Officer displayed 'contempt of cop' reaction Internal Affairs

Contempt Of Cop II

CAMERA IS THE NEW SPEAK FOR GUN IN THE WILD, WILD WEST! - It's more about 'contempt of cop' than the violation of the wiretapping law.

Welcome to America Now step inside the jail cell - The audio exchange in this video was apparently recorded at the U.S. Canada border after a Canadian displayed contempt-of-cop towards the American law enforcement officer asking questions.

Contemptible police tactics - Cops raid the home of a licensed medical marijuana provider in Washington, handcuff the fourteen year old son and put a gun to his head, and search the nineteen year old daughter and take the contents of her mickey-mouse wallet.

How To Survive Traffic Stops in America, Submit, Instantly! - What the cops want is immediate obedience and submission. Many cops are ex-military and view the civilian motorists of America about like they viewed the hapless peasants of Iraq and Afghanistan, that is, with contempt, not as fellow citizens deserving of civility and respect. It is a possibly lethal mistake to do anything other than submit, instantly and obey! Or be ready to shoot first. But aim high.

My radio interview with Katherine Albrecht - Carlos Miller Photography is Not a Crime is interviewed by Katherine Albrecht, activist, radio host and privacy advocate, Tuesday afternoon where they discussed his blog, his arrests, the situation in the United Kingdom and the spread of contempt of cop cases that are popping up on the internet on a regular basis.

 

The Trial of Judge A. Howard Matz.

By Psych Ward Entertainment.

Contact | Killercop.com. All Rights Reserved.

Impressum